学习者使用有声思考协议参与纠正反馈

Q1 Arts and Humanities JALT CALL Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-28 DOI:10.29140/jaltcall.v17n3.461
Pedro Fernández-Michels, Laia Canals Fornons
{"title":"学习者使用有声思考协议参与纠正反馈","authors":"Pedro Fernández-Michels, Laia Canals Fornons","doi":"10.29140/jaltcall.v17n3.461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online language learning environments where asynchronous communication is the main form of relation between learners and teachers require learners to use self-regulatory skills that help them control their learning process and compensate for the lack of interaction with their teachers (Fernández-Toro & Furnborough, 2014; Fernández-Toro & Hurd, 2014). In such a context, feed-back can constitute a driver of self-regulation, facilitating information about the learning process that can contribute to the development of self-regulatory skills (Yu, Jiang & Zhou, 2020). The present article aims at providing insights about how online learners of German as a foreign language engage with written corrective feedback and co-construct meaning (Nicol, 2010). The eleven participants received two different types of corrective feedback: direct explicit feedback on one written assignment and indirect feedback using metalinguistic information and error categorization on the other. Upon receiving the feedback information, the learners were asked to carry out two screen-recorded think-aloud protocols. This article reports on the data obtained through these protocols after conducting thematic analysis (Brown & Clarke, 2006). The results show how learners engaged with each feedback modality and reveal that the feedback-revision generated expression of self-regulatory actions such as reflection on their performance, evaluation and planning.","PeriodicalId":37946,"journal":{"name":"JALT CALL Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learner engagement with corrective feedback using think-aloud protocols\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Fernández-Michels, Laia Canals Fornons\",\"doi\":\"10.29140/jaltcall.v17n3.461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online language learning environments where asynchronous communication is the main form of relation between learners and teachers require learners to use self-regulatory skills that help them control their learning process and compensate for the lack of interaction with their teachers (Fernández-Toro & Furnborough, 2014; Fernández-Toro & Hurd, 2014). In such a context, feed-back can constitute a driver of self-regulation, facilitating information about the learning process that can contribute to the development of self-regulatory skills (Yu, Jiang & Zhou, 2020). The present article aims at providing insights about how online learners of German as a foreign language engage with written corrective feedback and co-construct meaning (Nicol, 2010). The eleven participants received two different types of corrective feedback: direct explicit feedback on one written assignment and indirect feedback using metalinguistic information and error categorization on the other. Upon receiving the feedback information, the learners were asked to carry out two screen-recorded think-aloud protocols. This article reports on the data obtained through these protocols after conducting thematic analysis (Brown & Clarke, 2006). The results show how learners engaged with each feedback modality and reveal that the feedback-revision generated expression of self-regulatory actions such as reflection on their performance, evaluation and planning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JALT CALL Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JALT CALL Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n3.461\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JALT CALL Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n3.461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

异步交流是学习者和教师之间关系的主要形式的在线语言学习环境要求学习者使用自我调节技能,帮助他们控制自己的学习过程,弥补与老师之间缺乏互动(Fernández-Toro & Furnborough, 2014;Fernández-Toro & Hurd, 2014)。在这种情况下,反馈可以成为自我调节的驱动因素,促进学习过程的信息,从而有助于自我调节技能的发展(Yu, Jiang & Zhou, 2020)。本文旨在提供关于德语作为外语的在线学习者如何参与书面纠正反馈和共同构建意义的见解(Nicol, 2010)。11名参与者收到了两种不同类型的纠正反馈:一种是书面作业的直接明确反馈,另一种是使用元语言信息和错误分类的间接反馈。在收到反馈信息后,学习者被要求执行两个屏幕录制的有声思考协议。本文报告了通过这些协议进行专题分析后获得的数据(Brown & Clarke, 2006)。结果显示了学习者如何参与每种反馈模式,并揭示了反馈-修订产生了自我调节行为的表达,如对自己的表现的反思、评估和计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learner engagement with corrective feedback using think-aloud protocols
Online language learning environments where asynchronous communication is the main form of relation between learners and teachers require learners to use self-regulatory skills that help them control their learning process and compensate for the lack of interaction with their teachers (Fernández-Toro & Furnborough, 2014; Fernández-Toro & Hurd, 2014). In such a context, feed-back can constitute a driver of self-regulation, facilitating information about the learning process that can contribute to the development of self-regulatory skills (Yu, Jiang & Zhou, 2020). The present article aims at providing insights about how online learners of German as a foreign language engage with written corrective feedback and co-construct meaning (Nicol, 2010). The eleven participants received two different types of corrective feedback: direct explicit feedback on one written assignment and indirect feedback using metalinguistic information and error categorization on the other. Upon receiving the feedback information, the learners were asked to carry out two screen-recorded think-aloud protocols. This article reports on the data obtained through these protocols after conducting thematic analysis (Brown & Clarke, 2006). The results show how learners engaged with each feedback modality and reveal that the feedback-revision generated expression of self-regulatory actions such as reflection on their performance, evaluation and planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JALT CALL Journal
JALT CALL Journal Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The JALT CALL Journal is an international refereed journal committed to excellence in research in all areas within the field of Computer Assisted Language Learning.
期刊最新文献
Corpus Linguistics in EFL Language Teaching: Insights From Research and Practice A Change for the Times: Rethinking Book Review Writing Word Parts and Language Learning A Contextualized Meaning-Recall Vocabulary Testing Platform Relationship Between L2 Proficiency and Psychological Traits With Self-Assessment Bias Among L2 Speakers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1