使用各种模型结构从南非耕作土壤的常规土壤分析中计算土壤可滴定酸度

V. White, P. Raath, A. Hardie, V. van der Berg, GF Sutton
{"title":"使用各种模型结构从南非耕作土壤的常规土壤分析中计算土壤可滴定酸度","authors":"V. White, P. Raath, A. Hardie, V. van der Berg, GF Sutton","doi":"10.1080/02571862.2023.2212191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil titratable acidity (TA) is determined through extraction with an acetate-buffered salt solution (potassium sulphate, K2SO4) and is routinely used to predict the soil lime requirement using the Eksteen method. Soil TA is not always reported by commercial soil testing laboratories, but rather exchangeable acidity (1M KCl) is determined. Therefore, a need exists to use other routinely determined soil properties in a model to derive TA. In this study, routine soil-analysis results from a commercial laboratory (n = 5 915 measurements) were used to generate various model structures to calculate a theoretical value of TA and to evaluate the accuracy thereof. Measured TA was found to be significantly correlated to the calculated TA using the Eksteen R-value, soil pH, organic carbon percentage, exchangeable Ca2+ and Mg2+, and a function of the interaction between pH and organic carbon. Soil TA could be calculated most accurately using these factors in multivariate adaptive regression splines model (r 2 = 0.69, mean absolute error = 0.16) at TA values of < 2 cmolc kg−1. However, the exponential model calculations remained stable over a larger range of actual TA values up to 4 cmolc kg−1. Given the ease of use and interpretability, it is recommended that an exponential function model is used to calculate TA.","PeriodicalId":21920,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculating soil titratable acidity from routine soil analyses of cultivated South African soils using various model structures\",\"authors\":\"V. White, P. Raath, A. Hardie, V. van der Berg, GF Sutton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02571862.2023.2212191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil titratable acidity (TA) is determined through extraction with an acetate-buffered salt solution (potassium sulphate, K2SO4) and is routinely used to predict the soil lime requirement using the Eksteen method. Soil TA is not always reported by commercial soil testing laboratories, but rather exchangeable acidity (1M KCl) is determined. Therefore, a need exists to use other routinely determined soil properties in a model to derive TA. In this study, routine soil-analysis results from a commercial laboratory (n = 5 915 measurements) were used to generate various model structures to calculate a theoretical value of TA and to evaluate the accuracy thereof. Measured TA was found to be significantly correlated to the calculated TA using the Eksteen R-value, soil pH, organic carbon percentage, exchangeable Ca2+ and Mg2+, and a function of the interaction between pH and organic carbon. Soil TA could be calculated most accurately using these factors in multivariate adaptive regression splines model (r 2 = 0.69, mean absolute error = 0.16) at TA values of < 2 cmolc kg−1. However, the exponential model calculations remained stable over a larger range of actual TA values up to 4 cmolc kg−1. Given the ease of use and interpretability, it is recommended that an exponential function model is used to calculate TA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2023.2212191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2023.2212191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Calculating soil titratable acidity from routine soil analyses of cultivated South African soils using various model structures
Soil titratable acidity (TA) is determined through extraction with an acetate-buffered salt solution (potassium sulphate, K2SO4) and is routinely used to predict the soil lime requirement using the Eksteen method. Soil TA is not always reported by commercial soil testing laboratories, but rather exchangeable acidity (1M KCl) is determined. Therefore, a need exists to use other routinely determined soil properties in a model to derive TA. In this study, routine soil-analysis results from a commercial laboratory (n = 5 915 measurements) were used to generate various model structures to calculate a theoretical value of TA and to evaluate the accuracy thereof. Measured TA was found to be significantly correlated to the calculated TA using the Eksteen R-value, soil pH, organic carbon percentage, exchangeable Ca2+ and Mg2+, and a function of the interaction between pH and organic carbon. Soil TA could be calculated most accurately using these factors in multivariate adaptive regression splines model (r 2 = 0.69, mean absolute error = 0.16) at TA values of < 2 cmolc kg−1. However, the exponential model calculations remained stable over a larger range of actual TA values up to 4 cmolc kg−1. Given the ease of use and interpretability, it is recommended that an exponential function model is used to calculate TA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Plant and Soil
South African Journal of Plant and Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal has a proud history of publishing quality papers in the fields of applied plant and soil sciences and has, since its inception, recorded a vast body of scientific information with particular reference to South Africa.
期刊最新文献
The impact of planting dates and hybrid selection on sunflower seed yield and oil content Comparison of the effectiveness of mined and by-product South African gypsums and other calcium sources for soil sodicity remediation Nutrient uptake and yield response of wheat ( Triticum spp.) to different fertiliser applications in Ethiopia Transpiration efficiency of lucerne under unlimited soil water conditions during the first growing season Digital soil mapping enables informed decision-making to conserve soils within protected areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1