量化宽松是好政策吗?

S. Anthony
{"title":"量化宽松是好政策吗?","authors":"S. Anthony","doi":"10.22459/ag.28.01.2021.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper asks whether the suite of unorthodox monetary policies (including quantitative easing, or QE) really make sense in the presence of a global liquidity trap. It finds that QE-type policies are an expedient remedy for short-term crisis management, but their ongoing and expanded use have distorted global markets and will have significant dynamic efficiency costs over the next decade. The alternative is for discretionary fiscal policy to play a bigger role in stabilisation, with monetary policy left to accommodate. Both policies should be operated by a single agency accountable to the electorate.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is quantitative easing good policy?\",\"authors\":\"S. Anthony\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/ag.28.01.2021.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper asks whether the suite of unorthodox monetary policies (including quantitative easing, or QE) really make sense in the presence of a global liquidity trap. It finds that QE-type policies are an expedient remedy for short-term crisis management, but their ongoing and expanded use have distorted global markets and will have significant dynamic efficiency costs over the next decade. The alternative is for discretionary fiscal policy to play a bigger role in stabilisation, with monetary policy left to accommodate. Both policies should be operated by a single agency accountable to the electorate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/ag.28.01.2021.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/ag.28.01.2021.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出的问题是,在全球流动性陷阱存在的情况下,一系列非正统的货币政策(包括量化宽松或QE)是否真的有意义。报告发现,量化宽松政策是短期危机管理的权宜之计,但其持续和扩大的使用扭曲了全球市场,并将在未来十年产生重大的动态效率成本。另一种选择是,由自由裁量的财政政策在稳定中发挥更大作用,而货币政策则有待调整。这两项政策都应该由一个对选民负责的机构来执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is quantitative easing good policy?
This paper asks whether the suite of unorthodox monetary policies (including quantitative easing, or QE) really make sense in the presence of a global liquidity trap. It finds that QE-type policies are an expedient remedy for short-term crisis management, but their ongoing and expanded use have distorted global markets and will have significant dynamic efficiency costs over the next decade. The alternative is for discretionary fiscal policy to play a bigger role in stabilisation, with monetary policy left to accommodate. Both policies should be operated by a single agency accountable to the electorate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structural reform of the Reserve Bank of Australia Which public debt should be paid off? ssessing the risks from Australia’s economic exposure to China Is quantitative easing good policy? Public infrastructure investment in the time of Covid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1