条顿骑士团总检察长对波兰-条顿冲突的看法

IF 0.1 3区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA Pub Date : 2023-01-30 DOI:10.12775/aph.2022.126.10
Přemysl Bar
{"title":"条顿骑士团总检察长对波兰-条顿冲突的看法","authors":"Přemysl Bar","doi":"10.12775/aph.2022.126.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the activities of the General Procurators of the Teutonic Order regarding the Polish-Teutonic dispute in the first thirty years of the fifteenth century. Based on their dispatches sent to Marienburg, it can be assumed that the Procurators were not passive executors of the Grand Master’s orders. Their frequently occurring disagreements resulted not only from their distinctive personal qualities but also from their different perspectives on assessing what was in the best interest of the Teutonic Order. The Grand Masters lacked professional knowledge not only of law (especially canon law) but also of how the Roman curia functioned.","PeriodicalId":42490,"journal":{"name":"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The General Procurators of the Teutonic Order Towards the Polish-Teutonic Conflict\",\"authors\":\"Přemysl Bar\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/aph.2022.126.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the activities of the General Procurators of the Teutonic Order regarding the Polish-Teutonic dispute in the first thirty years of the fifteenth century. Based on their dispatches sent to Marienburg, it can be assumed that the Procurators were not passive executors of the Grand Master’s orders. Their frequently occurring disagreements resulted not only from their distinctive personal qualities but also from their different perspectives on assessing what was in the best interest of the Teutonic Order. The Grand Masters lacked professional knowledge not only of law (especially canon law) but also of how the Roman curia functioned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/aph.2022.126.10\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA POLONIAE HISTORICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/aph.2022.126.10","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章讨论了条顿骑士团总检察长在15世纪头三十年中关于波兰-条顿争端的活动。根据他们发往马里恩堡的电报,可以假设检察官们不是大宗师命令的被动执行者。他们经常发生的分歧不仅是由于他们独特的个人品质,而且也是由于他们在评估什么对条顿骑士团最有利方面的观点不同。大大师们不仅缺乏法律(尤其是教会法)的专业知识,也不知道罗马教廷是如何运作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The General Procurators of the Teutonic Order Towards the Polish-Teutonic Conflict
The article deals with the activities of the General Procurators of the Teutonic Order regarding the Polish-Teutonic dispute in the first thirty years of the fifteenth century. Based on their dispatches sent to Marienburg, it can be assumed that the Procurators were not passive executors of the Grand Master’s orders. Their frequently occurring disagreements resulted not only from their distinctive personal qualities but also from their different perspectives on assessing what was in the best interest of the Teutonic Order. The Grand Masters lacked professional knowledge not only of law (especially canon law) but also of how the Roman curia functioned.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Półrocznik redagowany przez zespół pracowników naukowych Instytutu Historii PAN (do tomu 99 red. Maria Bogucka, od tomu 100 red. Halina Manikowska). Ceny numerów archiwalnych aktualizowane są na bieżąco.
期刊最新文献
Heritage Without Heirs: The German Legacy in Serbia. The Case of the Museum of Danube Swabians The Polish Catholic Church and the Public Memory of the Shoah: Between Mnemonic Backlash and Settling Accounts with the Past Jewish Autobiographical Writing. Memoirs of Moses Vasertsug (c. 1760–1832) Third War of Independence? The Anti-Colonial Dynamics of Ukraine’s Politics of Memory after 2014 on the Example of the National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War in Kyiv Peripheral (Non)Polishnesses. Museums, Creeping Conflicts, and Transformative Frictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1