文化创业记分卡:一种评估文化机构的工具

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY Pub Date : 2022-02-10 DOI:10.1080/10632921.2022.2030270
Edwin van Meerkerk
{"title":"文化创业记分卡:一种评估文化机构的工具","authors":"Edwin van Meerkerk","doi":"10.1080/10632921.2022.2030270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research into cultural entrepreneurship has not yet yielded a single definition of the term, or consensus on assessment criteria. In policy practice, however, cultural entrepreneurship is used as a criterion for subsidies and grants. This article brings together the criteria surfacing in academic literature in a model that allows both researchers and policy makers to assess cultural entrepreneurship. This model is tested in six case studies from the Netherlands. The conclusions show that, by focusing on five categories derived from the stakeholders of each cultural entrepreneur, a balanced view can be obtained. It is hypothesized that strategic choices may underlie the unbalance found between the five categories with each institution.","PeriodicalId":45760,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cultural Entrepreneurship Scorecard: An Instrument for Assessing Cultural Institutions\",\"authors\":\"Edwin van Meerkerk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10632921.2022.2030270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Research into cultural entrepreneurship has not yet yielded a single definition of the term, or consensus on assessment criteria. In policy practice, however, cultural entrepreneurship is used as a criterion for subsidies and grants. This article brings together the criteria surfacing in academic literature in a model that allows both researchers and policy makers to assess cultural entrepreneurship. This model is tested in six case studies from the Netherlands. The conclusions show that, by focusing on five categories derived from the stakeholders of each cultural entrepreneur, a balanced view can be obtained. It is hypothesized that strategic choices may underlie the unbalance found between the five categories with each institution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2022.2030270\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2022.2030270","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对文化创业的研究至今还没有得出一个单一的定义,也没有就评估标准达成共识。然而,在政策实践中,文化创业被用作补贴和赠款的标准。本文将学术文献中出现的标准汇集在一个模型中,该模型允许研究人员和政策制定者评估文化创业精神。该模型在荷兰的六个案例研究中得到了检验。结论表明,通过关注每个文化企业家的利益相关者衍生的五个类别,可以获得一个平衡的观点。据推测,战略选择可能是五种类型与每个机构之间发现的不平衡的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Cultural Entrepreneurship Scorecard: An Instrument for Assessing Cultural Institutions
Abstract Research into cultural entrepreneurship has not yet yielded a single definition of the term, or consensus on assessment criteria. In policy practice, however, cultural entrepreneurship is used as a criterion for subsidies and grants. This article brings together the criteria surfacing in academic literature in a model that allows both researchers and policy makers to assess cultural entrepreneurship. This model is tested in six case studies from the Netherlands. The conclusions show that, by focusing on five categories derived from the stakeholders of each cultural entrepreneur, a balanced view can be obtained. It is hypothesized that strategic choices may underlie the unbalance found between the five categories with each institution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY
JOURNAL OF ARTS MANAGEMENT LAW AND SOCIETY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: How will technology change the arts world? Who owns what in the information age? How will museums survive in the future? The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society has supplied answers to these kinds of questions for more than twenty-five years, becoming the authoritative resource for arts policymakers and analysts, sociologists, arts and cultural administrators, educators, trustees, artists, lawyers, and citizens concerned with the performing, visual, and media arts, as well as cultural affairs. Articles, commentaries, and reviews of publications address marketing, intellectual property, arts policy, arts law, governance, and cultural production and dissemination, always from a variety of philosophical, disciplinary, and national and international perspectives.
期刊最新文献
The Land of (Almost) No Central Government Arts Spending? Cultural Policy, Protestant Denominations, and the Cultural Policy Singularity of Unites States of America The Beginner’s Guide to Opera Stage Management: Gathering the Tools You Need to Work in Opera Arts and Culture Nonprofits as Civic Actors: Mapping Audience, Community, and Civic Engagement in Nonprofit Organizations Managing Arts Organizations The Advocacy Coalition in the British Film Institute in Its Early Days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1