基于信仰的全球卫生组织的横断面研究,以评估基督教研究合作的可行性

Jason Paltzer, Keyanna P. Taylor
{"title":"基于信仰的全球卫生组织的横断面研究,以评估基督教研究合作的可行性","authors":"Jason Paltzer, Keyanna P. Taylor","doi":"10.15566/cjgh.v8i1.491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Religiosity and spirituality are recognized determinants of health, yet many faith-based organizations do not conduct or publicly disseminate research or evaluation data to inform practice.  The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of establishing a collaborative to support small to medium-sized, Christian, global health organizations in producing stronger evidence regarding the practice and application of integral mission health models. \nMethods: A cross-sectional study was done using a digital, mixed-method (open- and closed-ended questions) survey.  The survey was distributed through a convenience sample of Christian global health networks and member organizations representing over 1,000 primarily small to medium sized organizations.  Information was collected regarding organizational research and evaluation publication/presentation experience, collaborative interests, evaluation and research barriers, and priorities.   \nResults: Responses totaled 116 and came from Christian health and development organizations in Africa, Asia, and North America.  The survey revealed three organizational research priorities and areas of desired assistance from a collaborative: 1) disseminating impacts, 2) evaluation skills and resources, including integral mission measurement tools, and 3) research design resources and services.  Interests varied depending on whether the organization was based inside or outside of the United States. \nDiscussion: The study aimed to identify priorities and barriers of Christian health organizations around research and outcomes evaluation.  The findings suggest that a Christian research collaborative is not only feasible but could serve organizations throughout the world that have a desire to conduct more rigorous evaluation and research studies and disseminate and publish their results yet lack the time, knowledge, or resources to do so.  Future studies should explore financial support systems to sustain a collaborative and create a model that could accommodate the different research and evaluation priorities depending on the location of the organization. ","PeriodicalId":52275,"journal":{"name":"Christian Journal for Global Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cross-Sectional Study of Faith-based Global Health Organizations to Assess the Feasibility of a Christian Research Collaborative\",\"authors\":\"Jason Paltzer, Keyanna P. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.15566/cjgh.v8i1.491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Religiosity and spirituality are recognized determinants of health, yet many faith-based organizations do not conduct or publicly disseminate research or evaluation data to inform practice.  The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of establishing a collaborative to support small to medium-sized, Christian, global health organizations in producing stronger evidence regarding the practice and application of integral mission health models. \\nMethods: A cross-sectional study was done using a digital, mixed-method (open- and closed-ended questions) survey.  The survey was distributed through a convenience sample of Christian global health networks and member organizations representing over 1,000 primarily small to medium sized organizations.  Information was collected regarding organizational research and evaluation publication/presentation experience, collaborative interests, evaluation and research barriers, and priorities.   \\nResults: Responses totaled 116 and came from Christian health and development organizations in Africa, Asia, and North America.  The survey revealed three organizational research priorities and areas of desired assistance from a collaborative: 1) disseminating impacts, 2) evaluation skills and resources, including integral mission measurement tools, and 3) research design resources and services.  Interests varied depending on whether the organization was based inside or outside of the United States. \\nDiscussion: The study aimed to identify priorities and barriers of Christian health organizations around research and outcomes evaluation.  The findings suggest that a Christian research collaborative is not only feasible but could serve organizations throughout the world that have a desire to conduct more rigorous evaluation and research studies and disseminate and publish their results yet lack the time, knowledge, or resources to do so.  Future studies should explore financial support systems to sustain a collaborative and create a model that could accommodate the different research and evaluation priorities depending on the location of the organization. \",\"PeriodicalId\":52275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christian Journal for Global Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christian Journal for Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v8i1.491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Journal for Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v8i1.491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:宗教和精神是公认的健康决定因素,但许多信仰组织并不进行或公开传播研究或评估数据,为实践提供信息。这项研究的目的是评估建立一个合作组织的可行性,以支持中小型基督教全球卫生组织就整体使命卫生模式的实践和应用提供更有力的证据。方法:采用数字混合方法(开放式和封闭式问题)进行横断面研究。该调查通过基督教全球健康网络和代表1000多个主要是中小型组织的成员组织的便利样本进行了分发。收集了有关组织研究和评估出版/演讲经验、合作兴趣、评估和研究障碍以及优先事项的信息。结果:共有116份回复,来自非洲、亚洲和北美的基督教健康与发展组织。调查揭示了三个组织研究优先事项和合作所需援助的领域:1)传播影响,2)评估技能和资源,包括综合任务衡量工具,以及3)研究设计资源和服务。利益因该组织是设在美国境内还是境外而异。讨论:该研究旨在确定基督教卫生组织在研究和结果评估方面的优先事项和障碍。研究结果表明,基督教研究合作不仅是可行的,而且可以为世界各地的组织提供服务,这些组织希望进行更严格的评估和研究,并传播和公布其结果,未来的研究应该探索财政支持系统,以维持合作,并创建一个模型,根据组织的位置,适应不同的研究和评估优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Cross-Sectional Study of Faith-based Global Health Organizations to Assess the Feasibility of a Christian Research Collaborative
Background: Religiosity and spirituality are recognized determinants of health, yet many faith-based organizations do not conduct or publicly disseminate research or evaluation data to inform practice.  The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of establishing a collaborative to support small to medium-sized, Christian, global health organizations in producing stronger evidence regarding the practice and application of integral mission health models. Methods: A cross-sectional study was done using a digital, mixed-method (open- and closed-ended questions) survey.  The survey was distributed through a convenience sample of Christian global health networks and member organizations representing over 1,000 primarily small to medium sized organizations.  Information was collected regarding organizational research and evaluation publication/presentation experience, collaborative interests, evaluation and research barriers, and priorities.   Results: Responses totaled 116 and came from Christian health and development organizations in Africa, Asia, and North America.  The survey revealed three organizational research priorities and areas of desired assistance from a collaborative: 1) disseminating impacts, 2) evaluation skills and resources, including integral mission measurement tools, and 3) research design resources and services.  Interests varied depending on whether the organization was based inside or outside of the United States. Discussion: The study aimed to identify priorities and barriers of Christian health organizations around research and outcomes evaluation.  The findings suggest that a Christian research collaborative is not only feasible but could serve organizations throughout the world that have a desire to conduct more rigorous evaluation and research studies and disseminate and publish their results yet lack the time, knowledge, or resources to do so.  Future studies should explore financial support systems to sustain a collaborative and create a model that could accommodate the different research and evaluation priorities depending on the location of the organization. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Christian Journal for Global Health
Christian Journal for Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Difference in Clinical Knowledge Between Staff Employed at Faith-based and Public Facilities in Malawi Faith-based Healthcare in Africa: Stylized Facts from Data Collected by the Catholic Church Effective Localization: Case Study of a Faith-based Health Partnership in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe Faith Based Healthcare in Africa Health Status Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Risk Perceptions in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1