作为前馈资源的定制法律写作指南:提高非法律专业学生在法律模块中的参与度和表现

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Law Teacher Pub Date : 2022-02-07 DOI:10.1080/03069400.2021.2022390
Luke Danagher
{"title":"作为前馈资源的定制法律写作指南:提高非法律专业学生在法律模块中的参与度和表现","authors":"Luke Danagher","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2021.2022390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Law schools are frequently tasked with teaching law modules to non-law students. Anecdotally at least, these students are often considered to have poor legal writing skills and this in turn affects their levels of engagement and attainment. This article reports on an action research study conducted with 453 business students at the University of Limerick. The study involved an anonymous student questionnaire (n = 69), which was designed to measure, inter alia, increases in student confidence, clarification of assessment expectations, and the overall successfulness of the Writing Guide as a feedforward resource. Open-ended questions were also included to capture unpredicted benefits reported by the students. It is argued that the successfulness of the writing guide is attributable to its status as a successful piece of feedforward. A proposed checklist of key aspects of a legal writing guide is offered.","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":"56 1","pages":"452 - 470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A bespoke legal writing guide as a feedforward resource: improving non-law students’ engagement and performance in law modules\",\"authors\":\"Luke Danagher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03069400.2021.2022390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Law schools are frequently tasked with teaching law modules to non-law students. Anecdotally at least, these students are often considered to have poor legal writing skills and this in turn affects their levels of engagement and attainment. This article reports on an action research study conducted with 453 business students at the University of Limerick. The study involved an anonymous student questionnaire (n = 69), which was designed to measure, inter alia, increases in student confidence, clarification of assessment expectations, and the overall successfulness of the Writing Guide as a feedforward resource. Open-ended questions were also included to capture unpredicted benefits reported by the students. It is argued that the successfulness of the writing guide is attributable to its status as a successful piece of feedforward. A proposed checklist of key aspects of a legal writing guide is offered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Teacher\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"452 - 470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2022390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2022390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法学院经常承担向非法律专业学生教授法律模块的任务。至少有趣的是,这些学生通常被认为法律写作技巧很差,这反过来影响了他们的参与度和成就水平。本文报道了一项对利默里克大学453名商科学生进行的行动研究。该研究涉及一份匿名学生问卷(n = 69),其目的是衡量学生信心的增加,评估期望的澄清,以及写作指南作为前馈资源的整体成功。为了捕捉学生们报告的意想不到的好处,开放式问题也被包括在内。文章认为,写作指南的成功在于它作为一篇成功的前馈。建议的清单的关键方面的法律写作指南提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A bespoke legal writing guide as a feedforward resource: improving non-law students’ engagement and performance in law modules
ABSTRACT Law schools are frequently tasked with teaching law modules to non-law students. Anecdotally at least, these students are often considered to have poor legal writing skills and this in turn affects their levels of engagement and attainment. This article reports on an action research study conducted with 453 business students at the University of Limerick. The study involved an anonymous student questionnaire (n = 69), which was designed to measure, inter alia, increases in student confidence, clarification of assessment expectations, and the overall successfulness of the Writing Guide as a feedforward resource. Open-ended questions were also included to capture unpredicted benefits reported by the students. It is argued that the successfulness of the writing guide is attributable to its status as a successful piece of feedforward. A proposed checklist of key aspects of a legal writing guide is offered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Law Teacher
Law Teacher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Lawyers and the rule of law Lawyers and the rule of law , by Andrew Boon, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2022, 573 pp., £90 (hardback), ISBN 978-1-50992-521-6 A binate regulatory framework for the accreditation of law faculties in Nigerian universities: a necessity or overkill? Getting to maybe: how to excel on law school exams Getting to maybe: how to excel on law school exams , by Richard Michael Fischl and Jeremy R. Paul, Durham, NC, Carolina Academic Press, 2023, 474 pp., $45.00 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-59460-734-9 Law teachers’ adoption and acceptance of OBE: a case study of Hong Kong Storytelling: a five-tier framework and the flipped classroom approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1