警察使用致命武器研究十年(2011-2020)

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Homicide Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-17 DOI:10.1177/10887679221123591
Daniela Oramas Mora, W. Terrill, Jacob Foster
{"title":"警察使用致命武器研究十年(2011-2020)","authors":"Daniela Oramas Mora, W. Terrill, Jacob Foster","doi":"10.1177/10887679221123591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study provides findings from a systematic review of the police use of deadly force literature over the most recently completed decade (2011–2020). After an exhaustive search of four scientific databases, 1,190 peer-reviewed articles related to the use of force were identified. Of these, 181 articles specifically examined deadly force, with 86 of them drawing on such force as the dependent variable. We found that the number of articles examining police use of deadly force increased dramatically over the course of the study period and encompassed a wide range of determinants of behavior. Citizen possession of a weapon continues to be the most consistent risk factor of police use of deadly force across decades of policing literature. Additionally, while many studies have attempted to examine the link between race and lethal force, a determination of such a relationship is difficult given both mixed findings and a lack of available national data.","PeriodicalId":51586,"journal":{"name":"Homicide Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"6 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Decade of Police Use of Deadly Force Research (2011–2020)\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Oramas Mora, W. Terrill, Jacob Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10887679221123591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study provides findings from a systematic review of the police use of deadly force literature over the most recently completed decade (2011–2020). After an exhaustive search of four scientific databases, 1,190 peer-reviewed articles related to the use of force were identified. Of these, 181 articles specifically examined deadly force, with 86 of them drawing on such force as the dependent variable. We found that the number of articles examining police use of deadly force increased dramatically over the course of the study period and encompassed a wide range of determinants of behavior. Citizen possession of a weapon continues to be the most consistent risk factor of police use of deadly force across decades of policing literature. Additionally, while many studies have attempted to examine the link between race and lethal force, a determination of such a relationship is difficult given both mixed findings and a lack of available national data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Homicide Studies\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"6 - 33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Homicide Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679221123591\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Homicide Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679221123591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目前的研究提供了对最近十年(2011-2020年)警察使用致命武力文献的系统回顾的结果。在对四个科学数据库进行详尽搜索后,确定了1190篇与使用武力有关的同行评审文章。其中,181篇文章专门研究了致命武力,其中86篇文章将这种武力作为因变量。我们发现,在研究期间,调查警察使用致命武力的文章数量急剧增加,涵盖了广泛的行为决定因素。在几十年的警务文献中,公民拥有武器仍然是警察使用致命武力的最一致的风险因素。此外,虽然许多研究试图检查种族和致命武力之间的联系,但由于研究结果不一,而且缺乏可用的国家数据,很难确定这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Decade of Police Use of Deadly Force Research (2011–2020)
The current study provides findings from a systematic review of the police use of deadly force literature over the most recently completed decade (2011–2020). After an exhaustive search of four scientific databases, 1,190 peer-reviewed articles related to the use of force were identified. Of these, 181 articles specifically examined deadly force, with 86 of them drawing on such force as the dependent variable. We found that the number of articles examining police use of deadly force increased dramatically over the course of the study period and encompassed a wide range of determinants of behavior. Citizen possession of a weapon continues to be the most consistent risk factor of police use of deadly force across decades of policing literature. Additionally, while many studies have attempted to examine the link between race and lethal force, a determination of such a relationship is difficult given both mixed findings and a lack of available national data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Homicide Studies
Homicide Studies CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Homicide Studies is an interdisciplinary, international publication dedicated to the dissemination of empirical research addressing issues pertinent to the study of homicide.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Gender Bias in Homicide Sentencing: An Empirical Study of Russian Court Decisions Using Text Mining The Gay and Trans Panic Defense: Focusing on the Homicides, Not the Court Room Strategy Black Femicides Matter: Conceptualizing the Killings of Black Girls and Women as Structural and Cultural Violence Housing Instability and Homicide: Exploring Variation in Housing Indicators on Homicide and Rates of Urban Crime “La Loca” y “La Victima”: An Analysis of Penalizing Gender Non-Conformity After Death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1