{"title":"英语霸权之前的全球化地理学:(埋藏的)理论、(非)旅行概念和阿根廷圣米格尔Tucumán的“世界主义地理学家”","authors":"Gerhard Rainer, Simon Dudek","doi":"10.5194/gh-77-297-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The relationship between “national” geographical schools and an increasingly\nglobalized geographical theory-building under the logics of Anglophone\nhegemony has generated critical debate within geography. This paper aims to\ncontribute to current discussions on the development of differential,\nlanguage-based “schools of thought” in geography and how these are mobilized\nand de- and recontextualized when they travel beyond their origins. However,\nit does not focus on the period of Anglophone hegemony but intends to shed a\nnew, historically informed light on the politics of geographical knowledge\nproduction. Against this backdrop, we study why, how and with what\nconsequences German geographical knowledge traveled to Argentina in the\n1940s – the end of the “German hegemony” – following the employment by the\nNational University of Tucumán (UNT) of the four German geography\nprofessors Wilhelm Rohmeder, Gustav Fochler-Hauke, Fritz Machatschek and\nWilli Czajka, all of whom had been institutionally and ideologically\nentwined with National Socialism. Firstly, we show that the epistemic\ndifferences between “national” schools of geographical thought – skillfully\njuggled by the geographers we analyze here – can provide an opportunity for\nthe successful de- and recontextualization of theory. Secondly, we argue\nthat boundary spanning and the traveling of theory beyond their geographical\norigins – largely (implicitly) viewed as progressive – should always be\nput in context(s) and assessed more cautiously from a normative point of\nview.\n","PeriodicalId":35649,"journal":{"name":"Geographica Helvetica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Globalizing geography before Anglophone hegemony: (buried) theories, (non-)traveling concepts, and “cosmopolitan geographers” in San Miguel de Tucumán (Argentina)\",\"authors\":\"Gerhard Rainer, Simon Dudek\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gh-77-297-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The relationship between “national” geographical schools and an increasingly\\nglobalized geographical theory-building under the logics of Anglophone\\nhegemony has generated critical debate within geography. This paper aims to\\ncontribute to current discussions on the development of differential,\\nlanguage-based “schools of thought” in geography and how these are mobilized\\nand de- and recontextualized when they travel beyond their origins. However,\\nit does not focus on the period of Anglophone hegemony but intends to shed a\\nnew, historically informed light on the politics of geographical knowledge\\nproduction. Against this backdrop, we study why, how and with what\\nconsequences German geographical knowledge traveled to Argentina in the\\n1940s – the end of the “German hegemony” – following the employment by the\\nNational University of Tucumán (UNT) of the four German geography\\nprofessors Wilhelm Rohmeder, Gustav Fochler-Hauke, Fritz Machatschek and\\nWilli Czajka, all of whom had been institutionally and ideologically\\nentwined with National Socialism. Firstly, we show that the epistemic\\ndifferences between “national” schools of geographical thought – skillfully\\njuggled by the geographers we analyze here – can provide an opportunity for\\nthe successful de- and recontextualization of theory. Secondly, we argue\\nthat boundary spanning and the traveling of theory beyond their geographical\\norigins – largely (implicitly) viewed as progressive – should always be\\nput in context(s) and assessed more cautiously from a normative point of\\nview.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":35649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographica Helvetica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographica Helvetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-297-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographica Helvetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-297-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Globalizing geography before Anglophone hegemony: (buried) theories, (non-)traveling concepts, and “cosmopolitan geographers” in San Miguel de Tucumán (Argentina)
Abstract. The relationship between “national” geographical schools and an increasingly
globalized geographical theory-building under the logics of Anglophone
hegemony has generated critical debate within geography. This paper aims to
contribute to current discussions on the development of differential,
language-based “schools of thought” in geography and how these are mobilized
and de- and recontextualized when they travel beyond their origins. However,
it does not focus on the period of Anglophone hegemony but intends to shed a
new, historically informed light on the politics of geographical knowledge
production. Against this backdrop, we study why, how and with what
consequences German geographical knowledge traveled to Argentina in the
1940s – the end of the “German hegemony” – following the employment by the
National University of Tucumán (UNT) of the four German geography
professors Wilhelm Rohmeder, Gustav Fochler-Hauke, Fritz Machatschek and
Willi Czajka, all of whom had been institutionally and ideologically
entwined with National Socialism. Firstly, we show that the epistemic
differences between “national” schools of geographical thought – skillfully
juggled by the geographers we analyze here – can provide an opportunity for
the successful de- and recontextualization of theory. Secondly, we argue
that boundary spanning and the traveling of theory beyond their geographical
origins – largely (implicitly) viewed as progressive – should always be
put in context(s) and assessed more cautiously from a normative point of
view.
期刊介绍:
Geographica Helvetica, the Swiss journal of geography, publishes contributions in all fields of geography as well as in related neighbouring disciplines. It is a multi-lingual journal, accepting articles in the three main Swiss languages, German, French, and Italian, as well as in English. It invites theoretical as well as empirical contributions. The journal welcomes contributions that specifically deal with empirical questions relating to Switzerland. The agenda of Geographica Helvetica is related to the specificity of Swiss geography as a meeting ground for different geographical traditions and languages (German, French, Italian and, more recently, a type of transnational, mainly English-speaking geography). The journal aims to become an ideal platform for the development of an informed, creative, and truly cosmopolitan geography. The journal will therefore provide space for cross-border theoretical debates around major thinkers – past and present – and the circulation of geographical ideas and concepts across Europe and beyond. The journal seeks to be a platform of debate also through innovative publication formats in its section "Interfaces", which publishes shorter interventions: reflection pieces on major thinkers as well as position papers (see manuscript types). Geographica Helvetica is promoted and supported by the following institutions: Swiss Academy of Sciences (SCNAT), Geographic and Ethnological Society of Zurich/Geographisch-Ethnographische Gesellschaft Zürich (GEGZ), and Swiss Association of Geography/Association Suisse de Géographie (ASG).