英语霸权之前的全球化地理学:(埋藏的)理论、(非)旅行概念和阿根廷圣米格尔Tucumán的“世界主义地理学家”

Q2 Social Sciences Geographica Helvetica Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI:10.5194/gh-77-297-2022
Gerhard Rainer, Simon Dudek
{"title":"英语霸权之前的全球化地理学:(埋藏的)理论、(非)旅行概念和阿根廷圣米格尔Tucumán的“世界主义地理学家”","authors":"Gerhard Rainer, Simon Dudek","doi":"10.5194/gh-77-297-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The relationship between “national” geographical schools and an increasingly\nglobalized geographical theory-building under the logics of Anglophone\nhegemony has generated critical debate within geography. This paper aims to\ncontribute to current discussions on the development of differential,\nlanguage-based “schools of thought” in geography and how these are mobilized\nand de- and recontextualized when they travel beyond their origins. However,\nit does not focus on the period of Anglophone hegemony but intends to shed a\nnew, historically informed light on the politics of geographical knowledge\nproduction. Against this backdrop, we study why, how and with what\nconsequences German geographical knowledge traveled to Argentina in the\n1940s – the end of the “German hegemony” – following the employment by the\nNational University of Tucumán (UNT) of the four German geography\nprofessors Wilhelm Rohmeder, Gustav Fochler-Hauke, Fritz Machatschek and\nWilli Czajka, all of whom had been institutionally and ideologically\nentwined with National Socialism. Firstly, we show that the epistemic\ndifferences between “national” schools of geographical thought – skillfully\njuggled by the geographers we analyze here – can provide an opportunity for\nthe successful de- and recontextualization of theory. Secondly, we argue\nthat boundary spanning and the traveling of theory beyond their geographical\norigins – largely (implicitly) viewed as progressive – should always be\nput in context(s) and assessed more cautiously from a normative point of\nview.\n","PeriodicalId":35649,"journal":{"name":"Geographica Helvetica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Globalizing geography before Anglophone hegemony: (buried) theories, (non-)traveling concepts, and “cosmopolitan geographers” in San Miguel de Tucumán (Argentina)\",\"authors\":\"Gerhard Rainer, Simon Dudek\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gh-77-297-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The relationship between “national” geographical schools and an increasingly\\nglobalized geographical theory-building under the logics of Anglophone\\nhegemony has generated critical debate within geography. This paper aims to\\ncontribute to current discussions on the development of differential,\\nlanguage-based “schools of thought” in geography and how these are mobilized\\nand de- and recontextualized when they travel beyond their origins. However,\\nit does not focus on the period of Anglophone hegemony but intends to shed a\\nnew, historically informed light on the politics of geographical knowledge\\nproduction. Against this backdrop, we study why, how and with what\\nconsequences German geographical knowledge traveled to Argentina in the\\n1940s – the end of the “German hegemony” – following the employment by the\\nNational University of Tucumán (UNT) of the four German geography\\nprofessors Wilhelm Rohmeder, Gustav Fochler-Hauke, Fritz Machatschek and\\nWilli Czajka, all of whom had been institutionally and ideologically\\nentwined with National Socialism. Firstly, we show that the epistemic\\ndifferences between “national” schools of geographical thought – skillfully\\njuggled by the geographers we analyze here – can provide an opportunity for\\nthe successful de- and recontextualization of theory. Secondly, we argue\\nthat boundary spanning and the traveling of theory beyond their geographical\\norigins – largely (implicitly) viewed as progressive – should always be\\nput in context(s) and assessed more cautiously from a normative point of\\nview.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":35649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographica Helvetica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographica Helvetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-297-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographica Helvetica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-297-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要在英语霸权的逻辑下,“国家”地理学派与日益全球化的地理理论建设之间的关系在地理学内部引发了激烈的争论。本文旨在促进当前关于地理中基于语言的不同“思想流派”的发展的讨论,以及当它们超越其起源时,这些学派是如何被动员、去中心化和重新语境化的。然而,它并不关注以英语为母语的霸权时期,而是打算对地理知识生产的政治提供新的历史信息。在这样的背景下,我们研究了德国地理知识在20世纪40年代——“德国霸权”的终结——为什么、如何以及带来了什么后果——在Tucumán国立大学(UNT)聘用了四位德国地理学教授威廉·罗迈德、古斯塔夫·福克勒-豪克、弗里茨·马察切克和威利·查伊卡之后,他们都在制度上和意识形态上与国家社会主义纠缠在一起。首先,我们展示了“国家”地理思想流派之间的认识差异——我们在这里分析的地理学家巧妙地处理了这一点——可以为理论的成功去语境化和重新语境化提供机会。其次,我们认为,边界跨越和超越其地理起源的理论旅行-在很大程度上(隐含地)被视为进步-应该始终放在上下文中,并从规范的角度更谨慎地进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Globalizing geography before Anglophone hegemony: (buried) theories, (non-)traveling concepts, and “cosmopolitan geographers” in San Miguel de Tucumán (Argentina)
Abstract. The relationship between “national” geographical schools and an increasingly globalized geographical theory-building under the logics of Anglophone hegemony has generated critical debate within geography. This paper aims to contribute to current discussions on the development of differential, language-based “schools of thought” in geography and how these are mobilized and de- and recontextualized when they travel beyond their origins. However, it does not focus on the period of Anglophone hegemony but intends to shed a new, historically informed light on the politics of geographical knowledge production. Against this backdrop, we study why, how and with what consequences German geographical knowledge traveled to Argentina in the 1940s – the end of the “German hegemony” – following the employment by the National University of Tucumán (UNT) of the four German geography professors Wilhelm Rohmeder, Gustav Fochler-Hauke, Fritz Machatschek and Willi Czajka, all of whom had been institutionally and ideologically entwined with National Socialism. Firstly, we show that the epistemic differences between “national” schools of geographical thought – skillfully juggled by the geographers we analyze here – can provide an opportunity for the successful de- and recontextualization of theory. Secondly, we argue that boundary spanning and the traveling of theory beyond their geographical origins – largely (implicitly) viewed as progressive – should always be put in context(s) and assessed more cautiously from a normative point of view.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geographica Helvetica
Geographica Helvetica Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Geographica Helvetica, the Swiss journal of geography, publishes contributions in all fields of geography as well as in related neighbouring disciplines. It is a multi-lingual journal, accepting articles in the three main Swiss languages, German, French, and Italian, as well as in English. It invites theoretical as well as empirical contributions. The journal welcomes contributions that specifically deal with empirical questions relating to Switzerland. The agenda of Geographica Helvetica is related to the specificity of Swiss geography as a meeting ground for different geographical traditions and languages (German, French, Italian and, more recently, a type of transnational, mainly English-speaking geography). The journal aims to become an ideal platform for the development of an informed, creative, and truly cosmopolitan geography. The journal will therefore provide space for cross-border theoretical debates around major thinkers – past and present – and the circulation of geographical ideas and concepts across Europe and beyond. The journal seeks to be a platform of debate also through innovative publication formats in its section "Interfaces", which publishes shorter interventions: reflection pieces on major thinkers as well as position papers (see manuscript types). Geographica Helvetica is promoted and supported by the following institutions: Swiss Academy of Sciences (SCNAT), Geographic and Ethnological Society of Zurich/Geographisch-Ethnographische Gesellschaft Zürich (GEGZ), and Swiss Association of Geography/Association Suisse de Géographie (ASG).
期刊最新文献
Die another day: explanations based on qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) for the survival and non-survival of isolated ski lifts in Switzerland Von Stadt, Land, Fluss zur Nachhaltigkeitskunde: (Irr-)Wege der Ausgestaltung des Fachwissens in den Berliner Geographielehrplänen der letzten drei Jahrzehnte Intime Infrastrukturen: Feministisch-geographische Perspektiven auf Energie Book review: Mehr-als-menschliche Geographien – Schlüsselwerke, Beziehungen und Methodiken Shifting values at the cemetery – the artistic interventions of DeathLab
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1