{"title":"对Breiman的两种统计建模文化的思考","authors":"A. Gelman","doi":"10.1353/obs.2021.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In his article on Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling, Leo Breiman argued for an algorithmic approach to statistics, as exemplified by his pathbreaking research on large regularized models that fit data and have good predictive properties but without attempting to capture true underlying structure. I think Breiman was right about the benefits of open-ended predictive methods for complex modern problems. I also discuss some points of disagreement, notably Breiman's dismissal of Bayesian methods, which I think reflected a misunderstanding on his part, in that he did not recognized that Bayesian inference can be viewed as regularized prediction and does not rely on an assumption that the fitted model is true. In retrospect, we can learn both from Breiman's deep foresight and from his occasional oversights.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/obs.2021.0025","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections on Breiman's Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling\",\"authors\":\"A. Gelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/obs.2021.0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In his article on Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling, Leo Breiman argued for an algorithmic approach to statistics, as exemplified by his pathbreaking research on large regularized models that fit data and have good predictive properties but without attempting to capture true underlying structure. I think Breiman was right about the benefits of open-ended predictive methods for complex modern problems. I also discuss some points of disagreement, notably Breiman's dismissal of Bayesian methods, which I think reflected a misunderstanding on his part, in that he did not recognized that Bayesian inference can be viewed as regularized prediction and does not rely on an assumption that the fitted model is true. In retrospect, we can learn both from Breiman's deep foresight and from his occasional oversights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Observational studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/obs.2021.0025\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Observational studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2021.0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2021.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
摘要:在《统计建模的两种文化》(Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling)一文中,Leo Breiman提出了统计学的算法方法,他对大型正则化模型进行了开创性的研究,这些模型拟合数据,具有良好的预测特性,但没有试图捕捉真正的底层结构。我认为Breiman关于开放式预测方法对复杂现代问题的好处是正确的。我还讨论了一些分歧点,特别是Breiman对贝叶斯方法的不屑一顾,我认为这反映了他的误解,因为他没有认识到贝叶斯推理可以被视为正则化预测,并且不依赖于拟合模型为真的假设。回顾过去,我们可以从布雷曼的远见卓识和偶尔的疏忽中吸取教训。
Reflections on Breiman's Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling
Abstract:In his article on Two Cultures of Statistical Modeling, Leo Breiman argued for an algorithmic approach to statistics, as exemplified by his pathbreaking research on large regularized models that fit data and have good predictive properties but without attempting to capture true underlying structure. I think Breiman was right about the benefits of open-ended predictive methods for complex modern problems. I also discuss some points of disagreement, notably Breiman's dismissal of Bayesian methods, which I think reflected a misunderstanding on his part, in that he did not recognized that Bayesian inference can be viewed as regularized prediction and does not rely on an assumption that the fitted model is true. In retrospect, we can learn both from Breiman's deep foresight and from his occasional oversights.