重写未写的:论戏剧恐惧症的历史

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 0 THEATER FORUM MODERNES THEATER Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI:10.2357/FMTH-2021-0020
François Lecercle
{"title":"重写未写的:论戏剧恐惧症的历史","authors":"François Lecercle","doi":"10.2357/FMTH-2021-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:From its very beginning in Greece, the stage has provoked hostile reactions. Between 1550 and 1850, this hostility produced a vast and repetitive body of treatises and polemical tracts. The debates were endlessly rewritten, giving the impression that most polemicists repeated their predecessors. But under the appearance of immobility, the terms of the debate were extremely sensitive to local conditions. We have to understand how the theatrophobic script is adapted to a specific conflict: the same part is performed in a different context, often taking on new meanings. To identify the forces at play and the various stakes, one must look for traces of the unwritten – the oral debates on which the writings drew – in order to reconstruct the economic, social, and political tensions hidden under the mainly religious surface. We have to look for the performance under the text.","PeriodicalId":55908,"journal":{"name":"FORUM MODERNES THEATER","volume":"32 1","pages":"215 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rewriting the Unwritten: On the History of Theatrophobia\",\"authors\":\"François Lecercle\",\"doi\":\"10.2357/FMTH-2021-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:From its very beginning in Greece, the stage has provoked hostile reactions. Between 1550 and 1850, this hostility produced a vast and repetitive body of treatises and polemical tracts. The debates were endlessly rewritten, giving the impression that most polemicists repeated their predecessors. But under the appearance of immobility, the terms of the debate were extremely sensitive to local conditions. We have to understand how the theatrophobic script is adapted to a specific conflict: the same part is performed in a different context, often taking on new meanings. To identify the forces at play and the various stakes, one must look for traces of the unwritten – the oral debates on which the writings drew – in order to reconstruct the economic, social, and political tensions hidden under the mainly religious surface. We have to look for the performance under the text.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FORUM MODERNES THEATER\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"215 - 227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FORUM MODERNES THEATER\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2357/FMTH-2021-0020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM MODERNES THEATER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2357/FMTH-2021-0020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:该舞台从一开始在希腊就引发了敌对反应。1550年至1850年间,这种敌意产生了大量重复的论文和争论文章。辩论被无休止地改写,给人的印象是大多数辩论家都在重复他们的前任。但在表面上不动的情况下,辩论的条件对当地情况极为敏感。我们必须理解戏剧恐怖剧本是如何适应特定冲突的:同一部分在不同的背景下表演,通常具有新的含义。为了确定起作用的力量和各种利害关系,人们必须寻找不成文的痕迹——作品所依据的口头辩论——以重建隐藏在主要宗教表面下的经济、社会和政治紧张局势。我们得在课文下面找表演。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rewriting the Unwritten: On the History of Theatrophobia
Abstract:From its very beginning in Greece, the stage has provoked hostile reactions. Between 1550 and 1850, this hostility produced a vast and repetitive body of treatises and polemical tracts. The debates were endlessly rewritten, giving the impression that most polemicists repeated their predecessors. But under the appearance of immobility, the terms of the debate were extremely sensitive to local conditions. We have to understand how the theatrophobic script is adapted to a specific conflict: the same part is performed in a different context, often taking on new meanings. To identify the forces at play and the various stakes, one must look for traces of the unwritten – the oral debates on which the writings drew – in order to reconstruct the economic, social, and political tensions hidden under the mainly religious surface. We have to look for the performance under the text.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Editorial Editorial Lotte Schüßler: Theaterausstellungen. Spielräume der Geisteswissenschaften um 1900. Göttingen: Wallstein 2022, 289 Seiten Karin Nissen-Rizvani, Martin Jörg Schäfer (Hg.): TogetherText. Prozessual erzeugte Texte im Gegenwartstheater. Recherchen 155. Berlin: Theater der Zeit 2020 Ulf Otto (Hg.): Algorithmen des Theaters. Ein Arbeitsbuch. Berlin: Alexander Verlag 2020, 326 Seiten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1