{"title":"教师“开放”问题中的开放性定义","authors":"Chrysi Rapanta","doi":"10.1075/ps.20015.rap","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Extensive research has focused on analysing teacher-student discourse within whole-class dialogic interactions,\n and several descriptive tools have been proposed so far to cover possible variations. However, what still remains unanswered is\n what types of teacher questions are ‘better’ than others. To answer this question, I propose a pragmatic analysis of\n teacher-student interaction based on the criteria of authenticity and dialogicity. The analysis focuses on two types of dialogue\n moves, ‘information-seeking’ and ‘inquiry’ moves and their subtypes, as assessed on the basis of their degree of dialogicity,\n emerging from the dialogue sequence in which the moves are situated. The discussion focuses on how such a normative analysis of\n interaction can help teachers guide more productive dialogues with their students.","PeriodicalId":44036,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics and Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining openness in teachers’ ‘open’ questions\",\"authors\":\"Chrysi Rapanta\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ps.20015.rap\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Extensive research has focused on analysing teacher-student discourse within whole-class dialogic interactions,\\n and several descriptive tools have been proposed so far to cover possible variations. However, what still remains unanswered is\\n what types of teacher questions are ‘better’ than others. To answer this question, I propose a pragmatic analysis of\\n teacher-student interaction based on the criteria of authenticity and dialogicity. The analysis focuses on two types of dialogue\\n moves, ‘information-seeking’ and ‘inquiry’ moves and their subtypes, as assessed on the basis of their degree of dialogicity,\\n emerging from the dialogue sequence in which the moves are situated. The discussion focuses on how such a normative analysis of\\n interaction can help teachers guide more productive dialogues with their students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatics and Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20015.rap\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20015.rap","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Extensive research has focused on analysing teacher-student discourse within whole-class dialogic interactions,
and several descriptive tools have been proposed so far to cover possible variations. However, what still remains unanswered is
what types of teacher questions are ‘better’ than others. To answer this question, I propose a pragmatic analysis of
teacher-student interaction based on the criteria of authenticity and dialogicity. The analysis focuses on two types of dialogue
moves, ‘information-seeking’ and ‘inquiry’ moves and their subtypes, as assessed on the basis of their degree of dialogicity,
emerging from the dialogue sequence in which the moves are situated. The discussion focuses on how such a normative analysis of
interaction can help teachers guide more productive dialogues with their students.