教师“开放”问题中的开放性定义

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Pragmatics and Society Pub Date : 2023-07-27 DOI:10.1075/ps.20015.rap
Chrysi Rapanta
{"title":"教师“开放”问题中的开放性定义","authors":"Chrysi Rapanta","doi":"10.1075/ps.20015.rap","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Extensive research has focused on analysing teacher-student discourse within whole-class dialogic interactions,\n and several descriptive tools have been proposed so far to cover possible variations. However, what still remains unanswered is\n what types of teacher questions are ‘better’ than others. To answer this question, I propose a pragmatic analysis of\n teacher-student interaction based on the criteria of authenticity and dialogicity. The analysis focuses on two types of dialogue\n moves, ‘information-seeking’ and ‘inquiry’ moves and their subtypes, as assessed on the basis of their degree of dialogicity,\n emerging from the dialogue sequence in which the moves are situated. The discussion focuses on how such a normative analysis of\n interaction can help teachers guide more productive dialogues with their students.","PeriodicalId":44036,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics and Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining openness in teachers’ ‘open’ questions\",\"authors\":\"Chrysi Rapanta\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ps.20015.rap\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Extensive research has focused on analysing teacher-student discourse within whole-class dialogic interactions,\\n and several descriptive tools have been proposed so far to cover possible variations. However, what still remains unanswered is\\n what types of teacher questions are ‘better’ than others. To answer this question, I propose a pragmatic analysis of\\n teacher-student interaction based on the criteria of authenticity and dialogicity. The analysis focuses on two types of dialogue\\n moves, ‘information-seeking’ and ‘inquiry’ moves and their subtypes, as assessed on the basis of their degree of dialogicity,\\n emerging from the dialogue sequence in which the moves are situated. The discussion focuses on how such a normative analysis of\\n interaction can help teachers guide more productive dialogues with their students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatics and Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20015.rap\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20015.rap","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

广泛的研究集中在分析课堂对话互动中的师生话语,目前已经提出了几种描述工具来涵盖可能的变化。然而,仍然没有答案的是,哪种类型的教师问题比其他问题“更好”。为了回答这个问题,我提出了一种基于真实性和对话性标准的师生互动语用分析。分析的重点是两种类型的对话动作,“信息寻求”和“询问”动作及其子类型,根据它们的对话程度进行评估,从这些动作所在的对话序列中出现。讨论的重点是这种对互动的规范分析如何帮助教师指导与学生进行更有成效的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining openness in teachers’ ‘open’ questions
Extensive research has focused on analysing teacher-student discourse within whole-class dialogic interactions, and several descriptive tools have been proposed so far to cover possible variations. However, what still remains unanswered is what types of teacher questions are ‘better’ than others. To answer this question, I propose a pragmatic analysis of teacher-student interaction based on the criteria of authenticity and dialogicity. The analysis focuses on two types of dialogue moves, ‘information-seeking’ and ‘inquiry’ moves and their subtypes, as assessed on the basis of their degree of dialogicity, emerging from the dialogue sequence in which the moves are situated. The discussion focuses on how such a normative analysis of interaction can help teachers guide more productive dialogues with their students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
“Not everything is on the hostess” Code accommodation as a measure of inclusion for bilingual people living with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type Verbal play in dementia care “Let’s Just Forget It!” Learning from initial reviews of multilingual graphics illustrating dementia caregiving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1