优惠政策:分配政治的永久成本

A. Hoffer, R. Sobel
{"title":"优惠政策:分配政治的永久成本","authors":"A. Hoffer, R. Sobel","doi":"10.1332/251510818X15368388991035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many, but not all, US state governments have adopted 'preference policies' that give an advantage to in-state businesses (vendors) who submit bid proposals for state projects. Most preference policies are specified in terms of a specific percentage advantage, which means that an in-state\n vendor will be chosen even if they submit a higher bid than a lower-cost out-of-state vendor. Some states have broad policies that apply to all or virtually all state contracts, while others apply these policies selectively only to one or a few specific goods and services. We estimate the\n effects of these policies on the costs of government. We find that preference policies are associated with a $167 increase per person in state construction costs and a $176 increase per capita in capital expenditures. In addition, we find that states implementing preference policies\n experienced a one unit decline in their economic freedom scores.","PeriodicalId":53126,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preference policies: perpetual costs of distributive politics\",\"authors\":\"A. Hoffer, R. Sobel\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/251510818X15368388991035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many, but not all, US state governments have adopted 'preference policies' that give an advantage to in-state businesses (vendors) who submit bid proposals for state projects. Most preference policies are specified in terms of a specific percentage advantage, which means that an in-state\\n vendor will be chosen even if they submit a higher bid than a lower-cost out-of-state vendor. Some states have broad policies that apply to all or virtually all state contracts, while others apply these policies selectively only to one or a few specific goods and services. We estimate the\\n effects of these policies on the costs of government. We find that preference policies are associated with a $167 increase per person in state construction costs and a $176 increase per capita in capital expenditures. In addition, we find that states implementing preference policies\\n experienced a one unit decline in their economic freedom scores.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15368388991035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/251510818X15368388991035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多(但不是所有)美国州政府都采取了“优惠政策”,为提交州项目投标书的州内企业(供应商)提供优势。大多数优惠政策都是根据特定的百分比优势来指定的,这意味着即使州内供应商提交的报价高于成本较低的州外供应商,他们也会被选中。一些州有广泛的政策,适用于所有或几乎所有的州合同,而另一些州则选择性地只适用于一种或几种特定的商品和服务。我们估计这些政策对政府成本的影响。我们发现,优惠政策与人均国家建设成本增加167美元和人均资本支出增加176美元有关。此外,我们发现,实施优惠政策的州的经济自由度得分下降了一个单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preference policies: perpetual costs of distributive politics
Many, but not all, US state governments have adopted 'preference policies' that give an advantage to in-state businesses (vendors) who submit bid proposals for state projects. Most preference policies are specified in terms of a specific percentage advantage, which means that an in-state vendor will be chosen even if they submit a higher bid than a lower-cost out-of-state vendor. Some states have broad policies that apply to all or virtually all state contracts, while others apply these policies selectively only to one or a few specific goods and services. We estimate the effects of these policies on the costs of government. We find that preference policies are associated with a $167 increase per person in state construction costs and a $176 increase per capita in capital expenditures. In addition, we find that states implementing preference policies experienced a one unit decline in their economic freedom scores.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contentious public finance: how entanglement shapes the costs of resisting elitist budgetary preferences Social versus individual work preferences: implications for optimal linear income taxation Introduction: special issue on the political economy of the War in Ukraine Introduction: special issue on the political economy of the War in Ukraine The political economy of public procurement in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1