提问技术对STEAM教学的影响

Q2 Social Sciences Action in Teacher Education Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/01626620.2019.1638848
Lorraine A. Jacques, Heidi Cian, Danielle Herro, Cassie F. Quigley
{"title":"提问技术对STEAM教学的影响","authors":"Lorraine A. Jacques, Heidi Cian, Danielle Herro, Cassie F. Quigley","doi":"10.1080/01626620.2019.1638848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math) instruction, inquiry and authentic problem solving connect the disciplines to encourage higher-order thinking and increase student engagement. For instruction to be successful in facilitating meaningful student thinking about authentic problems, however, the instructor needs to use strong questioning techniques. This study explored what questioning techniques teachers use as they enact STEAM instruction in their classrooms. Eight middle school teachers who had designed authentic STEAM lessons were observed and scored on a rubric reflecting various components of STEAM instruction as they implemented their lessons. Then transcripts from these lessons were coded to identify the types of questions teachers asked. These questions were identified as inquiry-based or non-inquiry-based using Llewellyn’s categories of inquiry-based questions. Findings show that teachers who scored lower on the rubric asked inquiry-based questions no more than 50% of the time, while teachers who scored higher on the rubric asked inquiry-based questions more than 70% of the time.","PeriodicalId":52183,"journal":{"name":"Action in Teacher Education","volume":"42 1","pages":"290 - 308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01626620.2019.1638848","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Questioning Techniques on STEAM Instruction\",\"authors\":\"Lorraine A. Jacques, Heidi Cian, Danielle Herro, Cassie F. Quigley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01626620.2019.1638848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math) instruction, inquiry and authentic problem solving connect the disciplines to encourage higher-order thinking and increase student engagement. For instruction to be successful in facilitating meaningful student thinking about authentic problems, however, the instructor needs to use strong questioning techniques. This study explored what questioning techniques teachers use as they enact STEAM instruction in their classrooms. Eight middle school teachers who had designed authentic STEAM lessons were observed and scored on a rubric reflecting various components of STEAM instruction as they implemented their lessons. Then transcripts from these lessons were coded to identify the types of questions teachers asked. These questions were identified as inquiry-based or non-inquiry-based using Llewellyn’s categories of inquiry-based questions. Findings show that teachers who scored lower on the rubric asked inquiry-based questions no more than 50% of the time, while teachers who scored higher on the rubric asked inquiry-based questions more than 70% of the time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"290 - 308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01626620.2019.1638848\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1638848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1638848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在STEAM(科学、技术、工程、艺术和数学)教学中,探究和真实的问题解决将学科联系起来,以鼓励更高层次的思维并提高学生的参与度。然而,为了使教学成功地促进学生对真实问题进行有意义的思考,教师需要使用强有力的提问技巧。本研究探讨了教师在课堂上实施STEAM教学时使用的提问技巧。研究人员观察了八名设计了真实STEAM课程的中学教师,并在一个反映STEAM教学各个组成部分的评分表上打分。然后,这些课程的文字记录被编码,以确定教师提出的问题类型。使用Llewellyn的探究式问题类别,这些问题被确定为探究式问题或非探究式问题。调查结果显示,得分较低的教师提出探究式问题的时间不超过50%,而得分较高的教师提出探究式问题的时间超过70%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Questioning Techniques on STEAM Instruction
ABSTRACT In STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math) instruction, inquiry and authentic problem solving connect the disciplines to encourage higher-order thinking and increase student engagement. For instruction to be successful in facilitating meaningful student thinking about authentic problems, however, the instructor needs to use strong questioning techniques. This study explored what questioning techniques teachers use as they enact STEAM instruction in their classrooms. Eight middle school teachers who had designed authentic STEAM lessons were observed and scored on a rubric reflecting various components of STEAM instruction as they implemented their lessons. Then transcripts from these lessons were coded to identify the types of questions teachers asked. These questions were identified as inquiry-based or non-inquiry-based using Llewellyn’s categories of inquiry-based questions. Findings show that teachers who scored lower on the rubric asked inquiry-based questions no more than 50% of the time, while teachers who scored higher on the rubric asked inquiry-based questions more than 70% of the time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Action in Teacher Education
Action in Teacher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Hurdles and Straightaways: Building a Cross-School Community of Practice White Preservice Teachers and Antiracist Practice: Enabling Trajectories of Learning and Identity in Teacher Preparation Engaging with Engagement: Interrogating Preservice Teachers’ Theories of Engagement in Their Literacy Planning and Reflection Applying an Equity Framework to Develop Inclusive Visions of STEM Teaching: Honoring the Voices of Students with Dis/Abilities Nearby Nature: An Interdisciplinary Science, Literacy, and Technology Project Situated within a Traditional Teacher Preparation Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1