{"title":"对性能诊断检查表-人力服务的程序改进的初步调查","authors":"Hanna Vance, Valdeep Saini, Emily L. Guertin","doi":"10.1080/01608061.2022.2043218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Performance Diagnostic Checklist – Human Services (PDC-HS) is a functional assessment tool used in the field of Organizational Behavior Management (OBM) to assess reasons for employee performance problems and inform intervention development. There are two aspects of the intervention-selection process that could inhibit the objectivity and utility of the tool, particularly for practitioners with limited experience conducting the assessment. Proposed refinements to address these drawbacks include (a) identifying a cutoff threshold to objectively identify the categories requiring intervention based on the PDC-HS outcome, and (b) developing decision-making models to identify a single category that should be the focus of intervention. A between-groups design was used to evaluate the degree to which access to components of these proposed refinements resulted in appropriate intervention selections when practitioners in the field were presented with scenarios derived from published case studies. Binary logistic regressions indicated that practitioners with refinement access were 4.97 times more likely to select the most appropriate category for intervention, relative to those who did not have access to the refinements (p < .001, 95% OR CI [2.38,10.41]). Secondary analyses indicated variables such as certification level and experience in organizational behavior management did not significantly influence the selection of an appropriate category for intervention. Preliminary findings suggest that future applications of the PDC-HS, particularly as it relates to the intervention-selection process, may benefit from the supplemented refinements.","PeriodicalId":51667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"282 - 308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A preliminary investigation of procedural refinements to the performance diagnostic checklist - human services\",\"authors\":\"Hanna Vance, Valdeep Saini, Emily L. Guertin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01608061.2022.2043218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Performance Diagnostic Checklist – Human Services (PDC-HS) is a functional assessment tool used in the field of Organizational Behavior Management (OBM) to assess reasons for employee performance problems and inform intervention development. There are two aspects of the intervention-selection process that could inhibit the objectivity and utility of the tool, particularly for practitioners with limited experience conducting the assessment. Proposed refinements to address these drawbacks include (a) identifying a cutoff threshold to objectively identify the categories requiring intervention based on the PDC-HS outcome, and (b) developing decision-making models to identify a single category that should be the focus of intervention. A between-groups design was used to evaluate the degree to which access to components of these proposed refinements resulted in appropriate intervention selections when practitioners in the field were presented with scenarios derived from published case studies. Binary logistic regressions indicated that practitioners with refinement access were 4.97 times more likely to select the most appropriate category for intervention, relative to those who did not have access to the refinements (p < .001, 95% OR CI [2.38,10.41]). Secondary analyses indicated variables such as certification level and experience in organizational behavior management did not significantly influence the selection of an appropriate category for intervention. Preliminary findings suggest that future applications of the PDC-HS, particularly as it relates to the intervention-selection process, may benefit from the supplemented refinements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"282 - 308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2022.2043218\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2022.2043218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
绩效诊断检查表-人力服务(PDC-HS)是组织行为管理(OBM)领域中用于评估员工绩效问题原因并为干预开发提供信息的功能评估工具。干预选择过程的两个方面可能会抑制工具的客观性和实用性,特别是对于进行评估的经验有限的从业人员。针对这些缺陷提出的改进包括(a)确定一个截止阈值,以客观地根据PDC-HS结果确定需要干预的类别,以及(b)开发决策模型,以确定应该作为干预重点的单一类别。当向该领域的从业者展示来自已发表的案例研究的情景时,使用组间设计来评估访问这些拟议改进的组成部分导致适当干预选择的程度。二元逻辑回归表明,与那些没有获得细化的从业者相比,有细化途径的从业者选择最合适的干预类别的可能性要高4.97倍(p < 0.001, 95% OR CI[2.38,10.41])。二次分析表明,认证水平和组织行为管理经验等变量对适当干预类别的选择没有显著影响。初步研究结果表明,PDC-HS的未来应用,特别是与干预选择过程有关的应用,可能受益于补充的改进。
A preliminary investigation of procedural refinements to the performance diagnostic checklist - human services
ABSTRACT The Performance Diagnostic Checklist – Human Services (PDC-HS) is a functional assessment tool used in the field of Organizational Behavior Management (OBM) to assess reasons for employee performance problems and inform intervention development. There are two aspects of the intervention-selection process that could inhibit the objectivity and utility of the tool, particularly for practitioners with limited experience conducting the assessment. Proposed refinements to address these drawbacks include (a) identifying a cutoff threshold to objectively identify the categories requiring intervention based on the PDC-HS outcome, and (b) developing decision-making models to identify a single category that should be the focus of intervention. A between-groups design was used to evaluate the degree to which access to components of these proposed refinements resulted in appropriate intervention selections when practitioners in the field were presented with scenarios derived from published case studies. Binary logistic regressions indicated that practitioners with refinement access were 4.97 times more likely to select the most appropriate category for intervention, relative to those who did not have access to the refinements (p < .001, 95% OR CI [2.38,10.41]). Secondary analyses indicated variables such as certification level and experience in organizational behavior management did not significantly influence the selection of an appropriate category for intervention. Preliminary findings suggest that future applications of the PDC-HS, particularly as it relates to the intervention-selection process, may benefit from the supplemented refinements.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Organizational Behavior Management—the official journal of the OBM Network (www.obmnetwork.com)—is a periodical devoted specifically to scientific principles to improve organizational performance through behavioral change. The journal publishes research and review articles, reports from the field, discussions, and book reviews on the topics that are critical to today"s organization development practitioners, operations managers, and human resource professionals.