领土与领土:融合与反驳的理论

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas Pub Date : 2020-02-28 DOI:10.17163/uni.n32.2020.05
Luís Alberto Herrera Montero, Lucía Herrera Montero
{"title":"领土与领土:融合与反驳的理论","authors":"Luís Alberto Herrera Montero, Lucía Herrera Montero","doi":"10.17163/uni.n32.2020.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Ecuador, themes regarding territory and territoriality are nowadays key theoretical and socio-political issues. Nonetheless, whilst they are already considered a priority in a number of institutional management and administration projects, their philosophical and socio-anthropological significance has not been sufficiently pondered. Government entities and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have been working on territorial planning for more than two decades; conversely, the theoretical production on the topics, with adequate scientific usefulness and practicality, is barely in its early stages of development. In such a context, the aim of this paper is to explore a number of epistemological approaches on the issues of territory and territoriality, employing hermeneutical, relational thinking and reflexivity methodologies. The overall picture and the outcomes of the study reveal both confluences and discrepancies between theories which have major epistemological relevance in social matters: Marxism, poststructuralism, and systemic complexity theories. As a general conclusion, it could be contended that while territory is mainly structural, territoriality refers to processes of societal transformation, metamorphosis and socio-natural tuning.","PeriodicalId":42999,"journal":{"name":"Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas","volume":"1 1","pages":"99-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Territorio y territorialidad: Teorías en confluencia y refutación\",\"authors\":\"Luís Alberto Herrera Montero, Lucía Herrera Montero\",\"doi\":\"10.17163/uni.n32.2020.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Ecuador, themes regarding territory and territoriality are nowadays key theoretical and socio-political issues. Nonetheless, whilst they are already considered a priority in a number of institutional management and administration projects, their philosophical and socio-anthropological significance has not been sufficiently pondered. Government entities and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have been working on territorial planning for more than two decades; conversely, the theoretical production on the topics, with adequate scientific usefulness and practicality, is barely in its early stages of development. In such a context, the aim of this paper is to explore a number of epistemological approaches on the issues of territory and territoriality, employing hermeneutical, relational thinking and reflexivity methodologies. The overall picture and the outcomes of the study reveal both confluences and discrepancies between theories which have major epistemological relevance in social matters: Marxism, poststructuralism, and systemic complexity theories. As a general conclusion, it could be contended that while territory is mainly structural, territoriality refers to processes of societal transformation, metamorphosis and socio-natural tuning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"99-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n32.2020.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n32.2020.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在厄瓜多尔,有关领土和属地的主题是当今重要的理论和社会政治问题。尽管如此,尽管它们已经被认为是一些机构管理和行政项目的优先事项,但它们的哲学和社会人类学意义尚未得到充分思考。20多年来,政府实体和非政府组织一直致力于领土规划;相反,这些主题的理论成果,具有足够的科学实用性和实用性,还处于发展的早期阶段。在这种背景下,本文的目的是探索关于领土和属地问题的一些认识论方法,采用解释学、关系思维和自反性方法。总体情况和研究结果揭示了在社会问题中具有重要认识论相关性的理论之间的融合和差异:马克思主义、后结构主义和系统复杂性理论。总的来说,可以说,虽然领土主要是结构性的,但领土性是指社会转型、蜕变和社会自然调整的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Territorio y territorialidad: Teorías en confluencia y refutación
In Ecuador, themes regarding territory and territoriality are nowadays key theoretical and socio-political issues. Nonetheless, whilst they are already considered a priority in a number of institutional management and administration projects, their philosophical and socio-anthropological significance has not been sufficiently pondered. Government entities and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have been working on territorial planning for more than two decades; conversely, the theoretical production on the topics, with adequate scientific usefulness and practicality, is barely in its early stages of development. In such a context, the aim of this paper is to explore a number of epistemological approaches on the issues of territory and territoriality, employing hermeneutical, relational thinking and reflexivity methodologies. The overall picture and the outcomes of the study reveal both confluences and discrepancies between theories which have major epistemological relevance in social matters: Marxism, poststructuralism, and systemic complexity theories. As a general conclusion, it could be contended that while territory is mainly structural, territoriality refers to processes of societal transformation, metamorphosis and socio-natural tuning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas
Universitas-Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of outdoor recreational activities to take advantage of the natural tourist resources of the parish of Lloa-Ecuador La gestión estratégica de los recursos humanos: una mirada desde las competencias en las ciencias humanas Teatro del oprimido como estrategia de intervención para prevenir el consumo de drogas en adolescentes; revisión bibliográfica Recreation and stress reduction in university students Los podcasts y su importancia en la educación superior; una revisión documental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1