确定性无线电广播的定长标记方案

Pub Date : 2021-09-20 DOI:10.1145/3470633
Faith Ellen, B. Gorain, Avery Miller, A. Pelc
{"title":"确定性无线电广播的定长标记方案","authors":"Faith Ellen, B. Gorain, Avery Miller, A. Pelc","doi":"10.1145/3470633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Broadcast is one of the fundamental network communication primitives. One node of a network, called the source, has a message that has to be learned by all other nodes. We consider broadcast in radio networks, modeled as simple undirected connected graphs with a distinguished source. Nodes communicate in synchronous rounds. In each round, a node can either transmit a message to all its neighbours, or stay silent and listen. At the receiving end, a node v hears a message from a neighbour w in a given round if v listens in this round and if w is its only neighbour that transmits in this round. If more than one neighbour of a node v transmits in a given round, we say that a collision occurs at v. We do not assume collision detection: in case of a collision, node v does not hear anything (except the background noise that it also hears when no neighbour transmits). We are interested in the feasibility of deterministic broadcast in radio networks. If nodes of the network do not have any labels, deterministic broadcast is impossible even in the four-cycle. On the other hand, if all nodes have distinct labels, then broadcast can be carried out, e.g., in a round-robin fashion, and hence O(log n)-bit labels are sufficient for this task in n-node networks. In fact, O(log Δ)-bit labels, where Δ is the maximum degree, are enough to broadcast successfully. Hence, it is natural to ask if very short labels are sufficient for broadcast. Our main result is a positive answer to this question. We show that every radio network can be labeled using 2 bits in such a way that broadcast can be accomplished by some universal deterministic algorithm that does not know the network topology nor any bound on its size. Moreover, at the expense of an extra bit in the labels, we can get the following additional strong property of our algorithm: there exists a common round in which all nodes know that broadcast has been completed. Finally, we show that 3-bit labels are also sufficient to solve both versions of broadcast in the case where it is not known a priori which node is the source.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constant-Length Labeling Schemes for Deterministic Radio Broadcast\",\"authors\":\"Faith Ellen, B. Gorain, Avery Miller, A. Pelc\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3470633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Broadcast is one of the fundamental network communication primitives. One node of a network, called the source, has a message that has to be learned by all other nodes. We consider broadcast in radio networks, modeled as simple undirected connected graphs with a distinguished source. Nodes communicate in synchronous rounds. In each round, a node can either transmit a message to all its neighbours, or stay silent and listen. At the receiving end, a node v hears a message from a neighbour w in a given round if v listens in this round and if w is its only neighbour that transmits in this round. If more than one neighbour of a node v transmits in a given round, we say that a collision occurs at v. We do not assume collision detection: in case of a collision, node v does not hear anything (except the background noise that it also hears when no neighbour transmits). We are interested in the feasibility of deterministic broadcast in radio networks. If nodes of the network do not have any labels, deterministic broadcast is impossible even in the four-cycle. On the other hand, if all nodes have distinct labels, then broadcast can be carried out, e.g., in a round-robin fashion, and hence O(log n)-bit labels are sufficient for this task in n-node networks. In fact, O(log Δ)-bit labels, where Δ is the maximum degree, are enough to broadcast successfully. Hence, it is natural to ask if very short labels are sufficient for broadcast. Our main result is a positive answer to this question. We show that every radio network can be labeled using 2 bits in such a way that broadcast can be accomplished by some universal deterministic algorithm that does not know the network topology nor any bound on its size. Moreover, at the expense of an extra bit in the labels, we can get the following additional strong property of our algorithm: there exists a common round in which all nodes know that broadcast has been completed. Finally, we show that 3-bit labels are also sufficient to solve both versions of broadcast in the case where it is not known a priori which node is the source.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3470633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3470633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

广播是最基本的网络通信原语之一。网络中的一个节点,称为源,有一条消息必须被所有其他节点学习。我们考虑无线网络中的广播,将其建模为具有区分源的简单无向连接图。节点以同步轮进行通信。在每一轮中,一个节点可以向其所有邻居发送消息,也可以保持沉默并听取消息。在接收端,如果v在此轮中侦听并且w是其唯一在此轮中发送的邻居,则节点v在给定的轮中收到邻居w的消息。如果节点v的多个邻居在给定的一轮中传输,我们说在v处发生了碰撞。我们不假设碰撞检测:在发生碰撞的情况下,节点v听不到任何东西(除了没有邻居传输时它也听到的背景噪声)。我们对无线网络中确定性广播的可行性很感兴趣。如果网络节点没有任何标签,即使在四个周期内也不可能进行确定性广播。另一方面,如果所有节点都有不同的标签,那么广播就可以进行,例如,以轮询的方式,因此在n节点网络中,O(log n)位标签就足以完成这项任务。事实上,O(log Δ)位标签(其中Δ是最大度)足以成功广播。因此,很自然地要问,非常短的标签是否足以播放。我们的主要结果是对这个问题的肯定回答。我们证明了每个无线网络都可以用2位标记,这样广播就可以通过一些不知道网络拓扑也不知道其大小的任何界限的通用确定性算法来完成。此外,以标签中额外的一位为代价,我们可以得到我们算法的以下附加强性质:存在一个所有节点都知道广播已经完成的公共轮。最后,我们表明,在先验不知道哪个节点是源的情况下,3位标签也足以解决两个版本的广播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Constant-Length Labeling Schemes for Deterministic Radio Broadcast
Broadcast is one of the fundamental network communication primitives. One node of a network, called the source, has a message that has to be learned by all other nodes. We consider broadcast in radio networks, modeled as simple undirected connected graphs with a distinguished source. Nodes communicate in synchronous rounds. In each round, a node can either transmit a message to all its neighbours, or stay silent and listen. At the receiving end, a node v hears a message from a neighbour w in a given round if v listens in this round and if w is its only neighbour that transmits in this round. If more than one neighbour of a node v transmits in a given round, we say that a collision occurs at v. We do not assume collision detection: in case of a collision, node v does not hear anything (except the background noise that it also hears when no neighbour transmits). We are interested in the feasibility of deterministic broadcast in radio networks. If nodes of the network do not have any labels, deterministic broadcast is impossible even in the four-cycle. On the other hand, if all nodes have distinct labels, then broadcast can be carried out, e.g., in a round-robin fashion, and hence O(log n)-bit labels are sufficient for this task in n-node networks. In fact, O(log Δ)-bit labels, where Δ is the maximum degree, are enough to broadcast successfully. Hence, it is natural to ask if very short labels are sufficient for broadcast. Our main result is a positive answer to this question. We show that every radio network can be labeled using 2 bits in such a way that broadcast can be accomplished by some universal deterministic algorithm that does not know the network topology nor any bound on its size. Moreover, at the expense of an extra bit in the labels, we can get the following additional strong property of our algorithm: there exists a common round in which all nodes know that broadcast has been completed. Finally, we show that 3-bit labels are also sufficient to solve both versions of broadcast in the case where it is not known a priori which node is the source.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1