{"title":"内在的超越。关于内在批评的支持","authors":"José Manuel Romero Cuevas","doi":"10.15366/BP2019.21.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the problem of the normative basis of immanent social critique, which is the paradigmatic form of critique inside the tradition of Critical Theory. To this purpose, my paper analyses two social fields and shows up factors of intrahistorical transcendence in them, which might serve to sustain a form of immanent critique. These fields are constituted by fundamental political concepts and the historical possibilities of social reality.","PeriodicalId":40614,"journal":{"name":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trascendencia en la inmanencia. Sobre el sustento de la crítica inmanente\",\"authors\":\"José Manuel Romero Cuevas\",\"doi\":\"10.15366/BP2019.21.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the problem of the normative basis of immanent social critique, which is the paradigmatic form of critique inside the tradition of Critical Theory. To this purpose, my paper analyses two social fields and shows up factors of intrahistorical transcendence in them, which might serve to sustain a form of immanent critique. These fields are constituted by fundamental political concepts and the historical possibilities of social reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15366/BP2019.21.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/BP2019.21.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trascendencia en la inmanencia. Sobre el sustento de la crítica inmanente
This paper examines the problem of the normative basis of immanent social critique, which is the paradigmatic form of critique inside the tradition of Critical Theory. To this purpose, my paper analyses two social fields and shows up factors of intrahistorical transcendence in them, which might serve to sustain a form of immanent critique. These fields are constituted by fundamental political concepts and the historical possibilities of social reality.