不同白蛴螬寄主对昆虫病原线虫敏感性的机制

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1163/15685411-bja10253
A. Katumanyane, B. Slippers, M. Wondafrash, A. Malan, B. Hurley
{"title":"不同白蛴螬寄主对昆虫病原线虫敏感性的机制","authors":"A. Katumanyane, B. Slippers, M. Wondafrash, A. Malan, B. Hurley","doi":"10.1163/15685411-bja10253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nControl of white grubs, the sporadic root-feeding larvae of scarabid beetles, is difficult due to their cryptic nature and resistance to chemical insecticides. Potential exists for the use of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) for such control. The successful infection of white grubs by EPN, however, is limited by the white grubs’ innate reduced susceptibility in form of behavioural, morphological and physiological defences. This study aimed to determine the different physiological defence mechanisms of white grubs against attack by EPN. The white grub species, Pegylis sommeri and Schizonycha affinis, which were previously found to have a low level of susceptibility to EPN, and Maladera sp. 4, which had previously shown a relative high level of susceptibility, were examined. The ability of the EPN to penetrate the white grubs and of the EPN symbiotic bacteria to grow inside the insect haemolymph, the encapsulation rates, as well as the nematode growth inside the insect haemolymph, were determined. The results showed that the ability of the nematodes to penetrate white grubs, the encapsulation rates and growth in the haemolymph varied between EPN and white grub species. The different species of the EPN symbiotic bacteria were able to grow in the haemolymph of all the white grub species tested. The results indicate that the white grub species investigated tended to resist the initial penetration of most of the EPN studied, thus avoiding infection.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms behind differential white grub host susceptibility to entomopathogenic nematodes\",\"authors\":\"A. Katumanyane, B. Slippers, M. Wondafrash, A. Malan, B. Hurley\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685411-bja10253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nControl of white grubs, the sporadic root-feeding larvae of scarabid beetles, is difficult due to their cryptic nature and resistance to chemical insecticides. Potential exists for the use of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) for such control. The successful infection of white grubs by EPN, however, is limited by the white grubs’ innate reduced susceptibility in form of behavioural, morphological and physiological defences. This study aimed to determine the different physiological defence mechanisms of white grubs against attack by EPN. The white grub species, Pegylis sommeri and Schizonycha affinis, which were previously found to have a low level of susceptibility to EPN, and Maladera sp. 4, which had previously shown a relative high level of susceptibility, were examined. The ability of the EPN to penetrate the white grubs and of the EPN symbiotic bacteria to grow inside the insect haemolymph, the encapsulation rates, as well as the nematode growth inside the insect haemolymph, were determined. The results showed that the ability of the nematodes to penetrate white grubs, the encapsulation rates and growth in the haemolymph varied between EPN and white grub species. The different species of the EPN symbiotic bacteria were able to grow in the haemolymph of all the white grub species tested. The results indicate that the white grub species investigated tended to resist the initial penetration of most of the EPN studied, thus avoiding infection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-bja10253\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-bja10253","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

白蛴螬是金龟甲虫的散发性根食幼虫,由于其隐蔽性和对化学杀虫剂的抗性,控制起来很困难。利用昆虫病原线虫(EPN)进行此类控制是有潜力的。然而,EPN对白蛴螬的成功感染受到白蛴螬先天易感性降低的限制,其表现形式为行为、形态和生理防御。本研究旨在探讨蛴螬对EPN的不同生理防御机制。研究了以往对EPN易感程度较低的白蛴螬Pegylis sommeri和Schizonycha affinis,以及以往对EPN易感程度较高的Maladera sp. 4。测定了EPN穿透蛴螬和EPN共生细菌在昆虫血淋巴内生长的能力、包封率以及线虫在昆虫血淋巴内的生长情况。结果表明,EPN和蛴螬对线虫的渗透能力、囊化率和在血淋巴中的生长均存在差异。不同种类的EPN共生细菌能够在所有测试的白蛴螬种的血淋巴中生长。结果表明,所调查的白蛴螬倾向于抵抗大部分EPN的初始渗透,从而避免感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mechanisms behind differential white grub host susceptibility to entomopathogenic nematodes
Control of white grubs, the sporadic root-feeding larvae of scarabid beetles, is difficult due to their cryptic nature and resistance to chemical insecticides. Potential exists for the use of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) for such control. The successful infection of white grubs by EPN, however, is limited by the white grubs’ innate reduced susceptibility in form of behavioural, morphological and physiological defences. This study aimed to determine the different physiological defence mechanisms of white grubs against attack by EPN. The white grub species, Pegylis sommeri and Schizonycha affinis, which were previously found to have a low level of susceptibility to EPN, and Maladera sp. 4, which had previously shown a relative high level of susceptibility, were examined. The ability of the EPN to penetrate the white grubs and of the EPN symbiotic bacteria to grow inside the insect haemolymph, the encapsulation rates, as well as the nematode growth inside the insect haemolymph, were determined. The results showed that the ability of the nematodes to penetrate white grubs, the encapsulation rates and growth in the haemolymph varied between EPN and white grub species. The different species of the EPN symbiotic bacteria were able to grow in the haemolymph of all the white grub species tested. The results indicate that the white grub species investigated tended to resist the initial penetration of most of the EPN studied, thus avoiding infection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1