传播学科在应对COVID-19中的作用:质疑积极偏差和批判性话语

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Creative Communications Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1177/09732586211002930
A. Singhal, Do Kyun David Kim
{"title":"传播学科在应对COVID-19中的作用:质疑积极偏差和批判性话语","authors":"A. Singhal, Do Kyun David Kim","doi":"10.1177/09732586211002930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic descended on us in an unexpected, uncontrollable, and unpredictable manner, disrupting the world order and affecting all sectors of human society. The world had little time to prepare for the ravages of a novel and highly infectious coronavirus. By February 2021, some 112 million people had contracted COVID-19 globally, and 2.5 million had died. Even with the availability of vaccines at warp speed, and vaccination efforts rolling out in early 2021, it is still uncertain how the pandemic—with all its highly infectious mutant variants—would play out. No one knows with any certainty what the endpoint will be, and what lies ahead. Since the spread of the COVID-19 was uncontrollable from the beginning, and little was known about the novel virus, the pandemic response has varied greatly at the global, national, and regional levels. Remarkably, several scientifically advanced countries had dismal pandemic responses, notably the USA and the UK. The U.S. arguably had the worst response, accounting for 25% (28 million) of the global COVID-19 cases, and 20% (500,000) of the deaths. In contrast, several developing countries of Asia and Africa have done a remarkable job of controlling COVID-19 with scant resources. For instance, to date, Bhutan has recorded only one death among its population, and Vietnam, Rwanda, and Senegal have, respectively, recorded 35, 226, and 700 deaths (Drexler, 2021). While the reasons for pandemic success vary from country-to-country, the key reasons for success centre around various communicative functions—the exercise of political will through the setting of media and public agendas (Dearing & Rogers, 1996), attentive and compassionate leadership with safety nets for the most vulnerable (Singhal & Rogers, 2003), clear cut publichealth guidance (Kim et al., 2014), early and relentless contact-tracing of people’s social networks, and a shared understanding of the value of preventive practices such as quarantining, social distancing, masking, and hand hygiene (Kim, 2020; Kim & Kreps, 2020). Unlike the disastrous leadership of Donald Trump in the USA, in Bhutan, King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck set the policy, media, and public agenda for COVID-19 right off the bat by telling government officials that even one death was too many, that detailed plans be made, Journal of Creative Communications 16(2) 135–138, 2021 © 2021 MICA-The School of Ideas Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/09732586211002930 journals.sagepub.com/home/crc","PeriodicalId":43888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/09732586211002930","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of the Communication Discipline to Tackle COVID-19: Interrogating Positive Deviations and Critical Discourses\",\"authors\":\"A. Singhal, Do Kyun David Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09732586211002930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic descended on us in an unexpected, uncontrollable, and unpredictable manner, disrupting the world order and affecting all sectors of human society. The world had little time to prepare for the ravages of a novel and highly infectious coronavirus. By February 2021, some 112 million people had contracted COVID-19 globally, and 2.5 million had died. Even with the availability of vaccines at warp speed, and vaccination efforts rolling out in early 2021, it is still uncertain how the pandemic—with all its highly infectious mutant variants—would play out. No one knows with any certainty what the endpoint will be, and what lies ahead. Since the spread of the COVID-19 was uncontrollable from the beginning, and little was known about the novel virus, the pandemic response has varied greatly at the global, national, and regional levels. Remarkably, several scientifically advanced countries had dismal pandemic responses, notably the USA and the UK. The U.S. arguably had the worst response, accounting for 25% (28 million) of the global COVID-19 cases, and 20% (500,000) of the deaths. In contrast, several developing countries of Asia and Africa have done a remarkable job of controlling COVID-19 with scant resources. For instance, to date, Bhutan has recorded only one death among its population, and Vietnam, Rwanda, and Senegal have, respectively, recorded 35, 226, and 700 deaths (Drexler, 2021). While the reasons for pandemic success vary from country-to-country, the key reasons for success centre around various communicative functions—the exercise of political will through the setting of media and public agendas (Dearing & Rogers, 1996), attentive and compassionate leadership with safety nets for the most vulnerable (Singhal & Rogers, 2003), clear cut publichealth guidance (Kim et al., 2014), early and relentless contact-tracing of people’s social networks, and a shared understanding of the value of preventive practices such as quarantining, social distancing, masking, and hand hygiene (Kim, 2020; Kim & Kreps, 2020). Unlike the disastrous leadership of Donald Trump in the USA, in Bhutan, King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck set the policy, media, and public agenda for COVID-19 right off the bat by telling government officials that even one death was too many, that detailed plans be made, Journal of Creative Communications 16(2) 135–138, 2021 © 2021 MICA-The School of Ideas Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/09732586211002930 journals.sagepub.com/home/crc\",\"PeriodicalId\":43888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Creative Communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/09732586211002930\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Creative Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732586211002930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732586211002930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情以不可预料、不可控制、不可预测的方式向我们袭来,扰乱了世界秩序,影响了人类社会的各个领域。世界几乎没有时间为一种新型高传染性冠状病毒的肆虐做好准备。截至2021年2月,全球约有1.12亿人感染COVID-19, 250万人死亡。即使疫苗以极快的速度可用,疫苗接种工作也将在2021年初推出,但目前仍不确定这种具有高度传染性的突变变体的大流行将如何发展。没有人确切地知道终点会是什么,前方会是什么。由于COVID-19的传播从一开始就无法控制,并且对这种新型病毒知之甚少,因此在全球,国家和地区层面的大流行应对措施存在很大差异。值得注意的是,几个科学发达的国家对疫情的反应令人沮丧,尤其是美国和英国。美国可以说是应对最糟糕的,占全球新冠肺炎病例的25%(2800万),占死亡人数的20%(50万)。相比之下,亚洲和非洲的一些发展中国家在资源匮乏的情况下,在控制COVID-19方面取得了令人瞩目的成就。例如,迄今为止,不丹仅记录了一人死亡,而越南、卢旺达和塞内加尔分别记录了35人、226人和700人死亡(德雷克斯勒,2021年)。虽然大流行成功的原因因国而不同,但成功的关键原因围绕着各种沟通功能-通过设置媒体和公共议程行使政治意愿(迪林和罗杰斯,1996年),为最弱势群体提供安全网的细心和富有同情心的领导(Singhal和罗杰斯,2003年),明确的公共卫生指导(Kim等人,2014年),早期和不懈地追踪人们的社交网络接触者,以及对隔离、社交距离、口罩和手部卫生等预防措施价值的共同理解(Kim, 2020年;Kim & Kreps, 2020)。与美国唐纳德·特朗普的灾难性领导不同,在不丹,国王吉格梅·凯萨尔·纳姆吉尔·旺楚克告诉政府官员,即使一个人死亡也太多了,也要制定详细的计划,立即制定了应对COVID-19的政策、媒体和公共议程,《创意传播杂志》16(2)135-138,2021©2021 MICA-The School of Ideas转载和许可:in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/09732586211002930 journals.sagepub.com/home/crc
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of the Communication Discipline to Tackle COVID-19: Interrogating Positive Deviations and Critical Discourses
The COVID-19 pandemic descended on us in an unexpected, uncontrollable, and unpredictable manner, disrupting the world order and affecting all sectors of human society. The world had little time to prepare for the ravages of a novel and highly infectious coronavirus. By February 2021, some 112 million people had contracted COVID-19 globally, and 2.5 million had died. Even with the availability of vaccines at warp speed, and vaccination efforts rolling out in early 2021, it is still uncertain how the pandemic—with all its highly infectious mutant variants—would play out. No one knows with any certainty what the endpoint will be, and what lies ahead. Since the spread of the COVID-19 was uncontrollable from the beginning, and little was known about the novel virus, the pandemic response has varied greatly at the global, national, and regional levels. Remarkably, several scientifically advanced countries had dismal pandemic responses, notably the USA and the UK. The U.S. arguably had the worst response, accounting for 25% (28 million) of the global COVID-19 cases, and 20% (500,000) of the deaths. In contrast, several developing countries of Asia and Africa have done a remarkable job of controlling COVID-19 with scant resources. For instance, to date, Bhutan has recorded only one death among its population, and Vietnam, Rwanda, and Senegal have, respectively, recorded 35, 226, and 700 deaths (Drexler, 2021). While the reasons for pandemic success vary from country-to-country, the key reasons for success centre around various communicative functions—the exercise of political will through the setting of media and public agendas (Dearing & Rogers, 1996), attentive and compassionate leadership with safety nets for the most vulnerable (Singhal & Rogers, 2003), clear cut publichealth guidance (Kim et al., 2014), early and relentless contact-tracing of people’s social networks, and a shared understanding of the value of preventive practices such as quarantining, social distancing, masking, and hand hygiene (Kim, 2020; Kim & Kreps, 2020). Unlike the disastrous leadership of Donald Trump in the USA, in Bhutan, King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck set the policy, media, and public agenda for COVID-19 right off the bat by telling government officials that even one death was too many, that detailed plans be made, Journal of Creative Communications 16(2) 135–138, 2021 © 2021 MICA-The School of Ideas Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india DOI: 10.1177/09732586211002930 journals.sagepub.com/home/crc
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
26.70%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Communications promotes inquiry into contemporary communication issues within wider social, economic, marketing, cultural, technological and management contexts, and provides a forum for the discussion of theoretical and practical insights emerging from such inquiry. The journal encourages a new language of analysis for contemporary communications research and publishes articles dealing with innovative and alternate ways of doing research that push the frontiers of conceptual dialogue in communication theory and practice. The journal engages with a wide range of issues and themes in the areas of cultural studies, digital media, media studies, technoculture, marketing communication, organizational communication, communication management, mass and new media, and development communication, among others. JOCC is a double blind peer reviewed journal.
期刊最新文献
Customer Engagement Through Transformational Campaigns: A Netnographic Exploration on the Storytelling Power of ‘Jaago Re’ Let Us Excite and Inspire Consumers to Recycle! Spokescharacters as Effective Environmental Communicators High Visual Complexity or Low Visual Complexity: A Study Related to Food Advertising on Instagram Sensemaking and Persuasive Sensegiving: The Thank You North East Regional COVID-19 Campaign, the Brief We Never Wanted! Role of COVID-19 Caller Tune and Intention to Get Vaccinated: An Application of the Health Belief Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1