智能手机应用程序作为帕金森病3期临床试验的探索性终点:一项试点研究

Q1 Computer Science Digital Biomarkers Pub Date : 2022-01-10 DOI:10.1159/000521232
A. Page, Norman C W Yung, P. Auinger, C. Venuto, Alistair Glidden, E. Macklin, L. Omberg, M. Schwarzschild, E. Dorsey
{"title":"智能手机应用程序作为帕金森病3期临床试验的探索性终点:一项试点研究","authors":"A. Page, Norman C W Yung, P. Auinger, C. Venuto, Alistair Glidden, E. Macklin, L. Omberg, M. Schwarzschild, E. Dorsey","doi":"10.1159/000521232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Smartphones can generate objective measures of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and supplement traditional in-person rating scales. However, smartphone use in clinical trials has been limited. Objective: This study aimed to determine the feasibility of introducing a smartphone research application into a PD clinical trial and to evaluate the resulting measures. Methods: A smartphone application was introduced part-way into a phase 3 randomized clinical trial of inosine. The application included finger tapping, gait, and cognition tests, and participants were asked to complete an assessment battery at home and in clinic alongside the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Results: Of 236 eligible participants in the parent study, 88 (37%) consented to participate, and 59 (27 randomized to inosine and 32 to placebo) completed a baseline smartphone assessment. These 59 participants collectively completed 1,292 batteries of assessments. The proportion of participants who completed at least one smartphone assessment was 61% at 3, 54% at 6, and 35% at 12 months. Finger tapping speed correlated weakly with the part III motor portion (r = −0.16, left hand; r = −0.04, right hand) and total (r = −0.14) MDS-UPDRS. Gait speed correlated better with the same measures (r = −0.25, part III motor; r = −0.34, total). Over 6 months, finger tapping speed, gait speed, and memory scores did not differ between those randomized to active drug or placebo. Conclusions: Introducing a smartphone application midway into a phase 3 clinical trial was challenging. Measures of bradykinesia and gait speed correlated modestly with traditional outcomes and were consistent with the study’s overall findings, which found no benefit of the active drug.","PeriodicalId":11242,"journal":{"name":"Digital Biomarkers","volume":"6 1","pages":"1 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Smartphone Application as an Exploratory Endpoint in a Phase 3 Parkinson’s Disease Clinical Trial: A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Page, Norman C W Yung, P. Auinger, C. Venuto, Alistair Glidden, E. Macklin, L. Omberg, M. Schwarzschild, E. Dorsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000521232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Smartphones can generate objective measures of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and supplement traditional in-person rating scales. However, smartphone use in clinical trials has been limited. Objective: This study aimed to determine the feasibility of introducing a smartphone research application into a PD clinical trial and to evaluate the resulting measures. Methods: A smartphone application was introduced part-way into a phase 3 randomized clinical trial of inosine. The application included finger tapping, gait, and cognition tests, and participants were asked to complete an assessment battery at home and in clinic alongside the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Results: Of 236 eligible participants in the parent study, 88 (37%) consented to participate, and 59 (27 randomized to inosine and 32 to placebo) completed a baseline smartphone assessment. These 59 participants collectively completed 1,292 batteries of assessments. The proportion of participants who completed at least one smartphone assessment was 61% at 3, 54% at 6, and 35% at 12 months. Finger tapping speed correlated weakly with the part III motor portion (r = −0.16, left hand; r = −0.04, right hand) and total (r = −0.14) MDS-UPDRS. Gait speed correlated better with the same measures (r = −0.25, part III motor; r = −0.34, total). Over 6 months, finger tapping speed, gait speed, and memory scores did not differ between those randomized to active drug or placebo. Conclusions: Introducing a smartphone application midway into a phase 3 clinical trial was challenging. Measures of bradykinesia and gait speed correlated modestly with traditional outcomes and were consistent with the study’s overall findings, which found no benefit of the active drug.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Biomarkers\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Biomarkers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000521232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000521232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:智能手机可以生成帕金森病(PD)的客观指标,并补充传统的面对面评分量表。然而,智能手机在临床试验中的使用受到了限制。目的:本研究旨在确定将智能手机研究应用引入帕金森病临床试验的可行性,并评估由此产生的措施。方法:将智能手机应用程序部分引入肌苷的3期随机临床试验。该应用程序包括手指敲击、步态和认知测试,参与者被要求在家中和诊所完成一组评估,并使用运动障碍协会统一帕金森病评定量表(MDS-UPDRS)。结果:在236名符合条件的父母研究参与者中,88人(37%)同意参与,59人(27人随机接受肌苷治疗,32人接受安慰剂治疗)完成了智能手机基线评估。这59名参与者共完成了1292组评估。参与者在3个月时完成了至少一次智能手机评估的比例为61%,在6个月时为54%,在12个月时则为35%。手指敲击速度与第三部分电机部分(r=−0.16,左手;r=−0.04,右手)和总MDS-UPDRS(r=–0.14)的相关性较弱。步态速度与相同测量值的相关性更好(r=−0.25,第三部分运动;r=−0.34,总计)。在6个月的时间里,随机接受活性药物或安慰剂治疗的患者的手指敲击速度、步态速度和记忆得分没有差异。结论:在3期临床试验的中途引入智能手机应用程序具有挑战性。运动迟缓和步态速度的测量与传统结果适度相关,并与该研究的总体结果一致,该研究没有发现活性药物的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Smartphone Application as an Exploratory Endpoint in a Phase 3 Parkinson’s Disease Clinical Trial: A Pilot Study
Background: Smartphones can generate objective measures of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and supplement traditional in-person rating scales. However, smartphone use in clinical trials has been limited. Objective: This study aimed to determine the feasibility of introducing a smartphone research application into a PD clinical trial and to evaluate the resulting measures. Methods: A smartphone application was introduced part-way into a phase 3 randomized clinical trial of inosine. The application included finger tapping, gait, and cognition tests, and participants were asked to complete an assessment battery at home and in clinic alongside the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Results: Of 236 eligible participants in the parent study, 88 (37%) consented to participate, and 59 (27 randomized to inosine and 32 to placebo) completed a baseline smartphone assessment. These 59 participants collectively completed 1,292 batteries of assessments. The proportion of participants who completed at least one smartphone assessment was 61% at 3, 54% at 6, and 35% at 12 months. Finger tapping speed correlated weakly with the part III motor portion (r = −0.16, left hand; r = −0.04, right hand) and total (r = −0.14) MDS-UPDRS. Gait speed correlated better with the same measures (r = −0.25, part III motor; r = −0.34, total). Over 6 months, finger tapping speed, gait speed, and memory scores did not differ between those randomized to active drug or placebo. Conclusions: Introducing a smartphone application midway into a phase 3 clinical trial was challenging. Measures of bradykinesia and gait speed correlated modestly with traditional outcomes and were consistent with the study’s overall findings, which found no benefit of the active drug.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Biomarkers
Digital Biomarkers Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Imperative of Voice Data Collection in Clinical Trials. eHealth and mHealth in Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs. Detecting Longitudinal Trends between Passively Collected Phone Use and Anxiety among College Students. Video Assessment to Detect Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Digital Vocal Biomarker of Smoking Status Using Ecological Audio Recordings: Results from the Colive Voice Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1