平纹织物表面粗糙度预测与评价的线性和二次模型方程的比较研究

IF 1.5 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES Research journal of textile and apparel Pub Date : 2022-02-22 DOI:10.1108/rjta-08-2021-0107
K. A. Beyene
{"title":"平纹织物表面粗糙度预测与评价的线性和二次模型方程的比较研究","authors":"K. A. Beyene","doi":"10.1108/rjta-08-2021-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nModeling helps to determine how structural parameters of fabric affect the surface of a fabric and also identify the way they influence fabric properties. Moreover, it helps to estimate and evaluate without the complexity and time-consuming experimental procedures. The purpose of this study is to develop and select the best regression model equations for the prediction and evaluation of surface roughness of plain-woven fabrics.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this study, a linear and quadratic regression model was developed for the prediction and evaluation of surface roughness of plain-woven fabrics, and the capability in accuracy and reliability of the two-model equation was determined by the root mean square error (RMSE). The Design-Expert AE11 software was used for developing the two model equations and analysis of variance “ANOVA.” The count and density were used for developing linear model equation one “SMD1” as well as for quadratic model equation two “SMD2.”\n\n\nFindings\nFrom results and findings, the effects of count and density and their interactions on the roughness of plain-woven fabric were found statistically significant for both linear and quadratic models at a confidence interval of 95%. The count has a positive correlation with surface roughness, while density has a negative correlation. The correlations revealed that models were strongly correlated at a confidence interval of 95% with adjusted R² of 0.8483 and R² of 0.9079, respectively. The RMSE values of the quadratic model equation and linear model equation were 0.1596 and 0.0747, respectively.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThus, the quadratic model equation has better capability accuracy and reliability in predictions and evaluations of surface roughness than a linear model. These models can be used to select a suitable fabric for various end applications, and it was also used for tests and predicts surface roughness of plain-woven fabrics. The regression model helps to reduce the gap between the subjective and objective surface roughness measurement methods.\n","PeriodicalId":21107,"journal":{"name":"Research journal of textile and apparel","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of linear and quadratic model equations for prediction and evaluation of surface roughness of a plain-woven fabric\",\"authors\":\"K. A. Beyene\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/rjta-08-2021-0107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nModeling helps to determine how structural parameters of fabric affect the surface of a fabric and also identify the way they influence fabric properties. Moreover, it helps to estimate and evaluate without the complexity and time-consuming experimental procedures. The purpose of this study is to develop and select the best regression model equations for the prediction and evaluation of surface roughness of plain-woven fabrics.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIn this study, a linear and quadratic regression model was developed for the prediction and evaluation of surface roughness of plain-woven fabrics, and the capability in accuracy and reliability of the two-model equation was determined by the root mean square error (RMSE). The Design-Expert AE11 software was used for developing the two model equations and analysis of variance “ANOVA.” The count and density were used for developing linear model equation one “SMD1” as well as for quadratic model equation two “SMD2.”\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nFrom results and findings, the effects of count and density and their interactions on the roughness of plain-woven fabric were found statistically significant for both linear and quadratic models at a confidence interval of 95%. The count has a positive correlation with surface roughness, while density has a negative correlation. The correlations revealed that models were strongly correlated at a confidence interval of 95% with adjusted R² of 0.8483 and R² of 0.9079, respectively. The RMSE values of the quadratic model equation and linear model equation were 0.1596 and 0.0747, respectively.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThus, the quadratic model equation has better capability accuracy and reliability in predictions and evaluations of surface roughness than a linear model. These models can be used to select a suitable fabric for various end applications, and it was also used for tests and predicts surface roughness of plain-woven fabrics. The regression model helps to reduce the gap between the subjective and objective surface roughness measurement methods.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research journal of textile and apparel\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research journal of textile and apparel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/rjta-08-2021-0107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research journal of textile and apparel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rjta-08-2021-0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的建模有助于确定织物的结构参数如何影响织物表面,并确定它们影响织物性能的方式。此外,它有助于在没有复杂和耗时的实验程序的情况下进行估计和评估。本研究的目的是开发和选择用于预测和评估平纹织物表面粗糙度的最佳回归模型方程。设计/方法/方法在本研究中,建立了一个用于预测和评估平纹织物表面粗糙度的线性和二次回归模型,并通过均方根误差(RMSE)确定了这两个模型方程的准确性和可靠性。Design Expert AE11软件用于开发两个模型方程和方差分析“ANOVA”。计数和密度用于开发线性模型方程一“SMD1”和二次模型方程二“SMD2”,在置信区间为95%的线性和二次模型中,计数和密度及其相互作用对平纹织物粗糙度的影响具有统计学意义。计数与表面粗糙度呈正相关,而密度则呈负相关。相关性表明,模型在95%的置信区间下具有强相关性,调整后的R²分别为0.8483和0.9079。二次模型方程和线性模型方程的均方根误差分别为0.1596和0.0747。原创性/价值因此,二次模型方程在预测和评估表面粗糙度方面比线性模型具有更好的能力、准确性和可靠性。这些模型可用于选择适合各种最终应用的织物,也可用于测试和预测平纹织物的表面粗糙度。回归模型有助于缩小主观和客观表面粗糙度测量方法之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of linear and quadratic model equations for prediction and evaluation of surface roughness of a plain-woven fabric
Purpose Modeling helps to determine how structural parameters of fabric affect the surface of a fabric and also identify the way they influence fabric properties. Moreover, it helps to estimate and evaluate without the complexity and time-consuming experimental procedures. The purpose of this study is to develop and select the best regression model equations for the prediction and evaluation of surface roughness of plain-woven fabrics. Design/methodology/approach In this study, a linear and quadratic regression model was developed for the prediction and evaluation of surface roughness of plain-woven fabrics, and the capability in accuracy and reliability of the two-model equation was determined by the root mean square error (RMSE). The Design-Expert AE11 software was used for developing the two model equations and analysis of variance “ANOVA.” The count and density were used for developing linear model equation one “SMD1” as well as for quadratic model equation two “SMD2.” Findings From results and findings, the effects of count and density and their interactions on the roughness of plain-woven fabric were found statistically significant for both linear and quadratic models at a confidence interval of 95%. The count has a positive correlation with surface roughness, while density has a negative correlation. The correlations revealed that models were strongly correlated at a confidence interval of 95% with adjusted R² of 0.8483 and R² of 0.9079, respectively. The RMSE values of the quadratic model equation and linear model equation were 0.1596 and 0.0747, respectively. Originality/value Thus, the quadratic model equation has better capability accuracy and reliability in predictions and evaluations of surface roughness than a linear model. These models can be used to select a suitable fabric for various end applications, and it was also used for tests and predicts surface roughness of plain-woven fabrics. The regression model helps to reduce the gap between the subjective and objective surface roughness measurement methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research journal of textile and apparel
Research journal of textile and apparel MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Modification of dehydrated bacterial cellulose with glycerol and succinic acid by using padding method for textile applications Key terms and topics of muscle-supportive and posture-corrective wearable robots for older adults using text mining and semantic network analyses Physical, thermal and mechanical properties of horse tail and mane hairs Enzymatic easing of adhesion in honeydew-contaminated cotton for textile applications Identification of bioactive compounds from onion (Allium burdickii) bulb using Raman, and FTIR spectroscopy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1