解释行为——它们是伟大的法律吗?它们(如何)构成伟大的法律?

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-28 DOI:10.1093/SLR/HMAB007
Ross Carter
{"title":"解释行为——它们是伟大的法律吗?它们(如何)构成伟大的法律?","authors":"Ross Carter","doi":"10.1093/SLR/HMAB007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paper considers the purposes and evolution of Interpretation Acts, including the following points:\n • how, as default law, they inform and interact with other legislation;\n • their scope as, and interaction with other, interpretation law (including links with interpretation legislation in related jurisdictions);\n • ways they can stop being, or fail to be, great law (that is, law that is accessible, fit for purpose, and constitutionally sound);\n • ways policy-makers and drafters can meet the challenges (in Te Reo Māori: ngā wero) of making them, and all the other law that interacts with them, great law.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretation Acts—Are They, and (How) Do They Make for, Great Law?\",\"authors\":\"Ross Carter\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/SLR/HMAB007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The paper considers the purposes and evolution of Interpretation Acts, including the following points:\\n • how, as default law, they inform and interact with other legislation;\\n • their scope as, and interaction with other, interpretation law (including links with interpretation legislation in related jurisdictions);\\n • ways they can stop being, or fail to be, great law (that is, law that is accessible, fit for purpose, and constitutionally sound);\\n • ways policy-makers and drafters can meet the challenges (in Te Reo Māori: ngā wero) of making them, and all the other law that interacts with them, great law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statute Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statute Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/SLR/HMAB007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statute Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/SLR/HMAB007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了解释法的目的和演变,包括以下几点:•作为默认法律,它们如何通知其他立法并与之互动;•它们作为解释法的范围以及与其他解释法的相互作用(包括与相关司法管辖区的解释立法的联系);•它们可能不再是或无法成为伟大的法律(即可获得的、符合目的的、符合宪法的法律);•政策制定者和起草者如何应对挑战(在Te Reo Māori: ngā wero),制定这些法律,以及与之相互作用的所有其他法律,成为伟大的法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interpretation Acts—Are They, and (How) Do They Make for, Great Law?
The paper considers the purposes and evolution of Interpretation Acts, including the following points: • how, as default law, they inform and interact with other legislation; • their scope as, and interaction with other, interpretation law (including links with interpretation legislation in related jurisdictions); • ways they can stop being, or fail to be, great law (that is, law that is accessible, fit for purpose, and constitutionally sound); • ways policy-makers and drafters can meet the challenges (in Te Reo Māori: ngā wero) of making them, and all the other law that interacts with them, great law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The principal objectives of the Review are to provide a vehicle for the consideration of the legislative process, the use of legislation as an instrument of public policy and of the drafting and interpretation of legislation. The Review, which was first established in 1980, is the only journal of its kind within the Commonwealth. It is of particular value to lawyers in both private practice and in public service, and to academics, both lawyers and political scientists, who write and teach within the field of legislation.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Criminal Law Bills: An In-Depth Critical Analysis of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Bill Four Years of Anti-COVID-19 Regulations in Greece: Overview of the Legislative and Regulatory Process and of an Exemplary Administrative Codification Two Uses of Purpose in Statutory Interpretation Climate Volatility, Foundational Freedoms, and the Environment Act 2021: The Transformative Potential of the Principle of Legality Protection of Athletes’ Rights in International Sports Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1