{"title":"ASL和LSF中的强代词?","authors":"P. Schlenker","doi":"10.1075/SLL.00025.SCH","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Theories of pronominal strength (e.g., Cardinaletti & Starke 1999)\n lead one to expect that sign language, just like spoken language, can have morphologically distinct strong pronominals. We suggest\n that American Sign Language (ASL) and French Sign Language (LSF) might have such pronominals, characterized here by the fact that\n they may associate with only even in the absence of prosodically marked focus.","PeriodicalId":43398,"journal":{"name":"Sign Language & Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strong pronominals in ASL and LSF?\",\"authors\":\"P. Schlenker\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/SLL.00025.SCH\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Theories of pronominal strength (e.g., Cardinaletti & Starke 1999)\\n lead one to expect that sign language, just like spoken language, can have morphologically distinct strong pronominals. We suggest\\n that American Sign Language (ASL) and French Sign Language (LSF) might have such pronominals, characterized here by the fact that\\n they may associate with only even in the absence of prosodically marked focus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sign Language & Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sign Language & Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/SLL.00025.SCH\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/SLL.00025.SCH","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Theories of pronominal strength (e.g., Cardinaletti & Starke 1999)
lead one to expect that sign language, just like spoken language, can have morphologically distinct strong pronominals. We suggest
that American Sign Language (ASL) and French Sign Language (LSF) might have such pronominals, characterized here by the fact that
they may associate with only even in the absence of prosodically marked focus.
期刊介绍:
Sign Language & Linguistics is a peer-reviewed, international journal which aims to increase our understanding of language by providing an academic forum for researchers to discuss sign languages in the larger context of natural language, crosslinguistically and crossmodally. SLL presents studies that apply existing theoretical insights to sign language in order to further our understanding of SL; it investigates and expands our knowledge of grammar based on the study of SL and it specifically addresses the effect of modality (signed vs. spoken) on the structure of grammar.