学前STEM专业学习模式对教育工作者态度、信念、信心和知识的实验影响

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education Pub Date : 2021-04-25 DOI:10.1080/10901027.2021.1911891
Alissa A. Lange, Irena Nayfeld, Hagit Mano, Kwanghee Jung
{"title":"学前STEM专业学习模式对教育工作者态度、信念、信心和知识的实验影响","authors":"Alissa A. Lange, Irena Nayfeld, Hagit Mano, Kwanghee Jung","doi":"10.1080/10901027.2021.1911891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Early science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education matters for young children’s learning and their academic trajectories (McClure et al., 2017), but teachers must be empowered and supported to effectively teach STEM subjects to all children, including dual language learners (DLLs). This study focused on a curriculum-agnostic professional learning model (Brenneman, Lange, & Nayfeld, 2019), which was co-developed with educators to positively impact attitudes, beliefs, confidence, knowledge, and ultimately, teaching practice for preschool teachers around teaching STEM and working with DLLs. Forty-seven lead preschool teachers were randomly assigned to treatment or control conditions. Treatment teachers participated in over two years of connected, reflective, multi-level experiences linked to their practice. Results showed positive effects on intervention teachers’ attitudes, beliefs, and confidence towards teaching science, math, and working with dual language learners compared to control teachers. Treatment teachers also exhibited significant increases in pedagogical and content knowledge related to teaching STEM and working with DLLs, but no significant impacts on knowledge of teaching math (numeracy). Implications and future directions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10901027.2021.1911891","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental effects of a preschool STEM professional learning model on educators’ attitudes, beliefs, confidence, and knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Alissa A. Lange, Irena Nayfeld, Hagit Mano, Kwanghee Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10901027.2021.1911891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Early science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education matters for young children’s learning and their academic trajectories (McClure et al., 2017), but teachers must be empowered and supported to effectively teach STEM subjects to all children, including dual language learners (DLLs). This study focused on a curriculum-agnostic professional learning model (Brenneman, Lange, & Nayfeld, 2019), which was co-developed with educators to positively impact attitudes, beliefs, confidence, knowledge, and ultimately, teaching practice for preschool teachers around teaching STEM and working with DLLs. Forty-seven lead preschool teachers were randomly assigned to treatment or control conditions. Treatment teachers participated in over two years of connected, reflective, multi-level experiences linked to their practice. Results showed positive effects on intervention teachers’ attitudes, beliefs, and confidence towards teaching science, math, and working with dual language learners compared to control teachers. Treatment teachers also exhibited significant increases in pedagogical and content knowledge related to teaching STEM and working with DLLs, but no significant impacts on knowledge of teaching math (numeracy). Implications and future directions are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10901027.2021.1911891\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2021.1911891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2021.1911891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

摘要早期科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育对幼儿的学习和学业轨迹很重要(McClure et al.,2017),但教师必须得到授权和支持,才能有效地向所有儿童教授STEM科目,包括双语学习者(DLL)。本研究重点关注课程不可知的专业学习模式(Brenneman,Lange,&Nayfeld,2019),该模式是与教育工作者共同开发的,旨在积极影响态度、信念、信心、知识,并最终影响学前教师围绕STEM教学和DLL工作的教学实践。47名幼儿教师被随机分配到治疗或对照组。治疗教师参与了两年多与他们的实践相关的、相互联系的、反思的、多层次的经验。结果显示,与对照教师相比,干预教师对科学、数学教学和与双语学习者合作的态度、信念和信心有积极影响。治疗教师在与STEM教学和DLL工作相关的教学和内容知识方面也有显著增加,但对数学(算术)教学知识没有显著影响。讨论了影响和未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental effects of a preschool STEM professional learning model on educators’ attitudes, beliefs, confidence, and knowledge
ABSTRACT Early science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education matters for young children’s learning and their academic trajectories (McClure et al., 2017), but teachers must be empowered and supported to effectively teach STEM subjects to all children, including dual language learners (DLLs). This study focused on a curriculum-agnostic professional learning model (Brenneman, Lange, & Nayfeld, 2019), which was co-developed with educators to positively impact attitudes, beliefs, confidence, knowledge, and ultimately, teaching practice for preschool teachers around teaching STEM and working with DLLs. Forty-seven lead preschool teachers were randomly assigned to treatment or control conditions. Treatment teachers participated in over two years of connected, reflective, multi-level experiences linked to their practice. Results showed positive effects on intervention teachers’ attitudes, beliefs, and confidence towards teaching science, math, and working with dual language learners compared to control teachers. Treatment teachers also exhibited significant increases in pedagogical and content knowledge related to teaching STEM and working with DLLs, but no significant impacts on knowledge of teaching math (numeracy). Implications and future directions are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education
Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, the official journal of the National Association of Early Childhood Teacher Educators, publishes original manuscripts, reviews, and information about association activities. Its purpose is to provide a forum for consideration of issues and for exchange of information and ideas about research and practice in early childhood teacher education. JECTE welcomes research reports, position papers, essays on current issues, reflective reports on innovative teacher education practices, letters to the editor and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of practica in early childhood education: Variation in criteria for placements and mentor educators Recognition of early childhood professionals’ competencies through a micro-credential program Early childhood inquiry and e-learning: recontextualizing a progressive pedagogy in online school A learner-centered journey: pre-service early childhood teachers’ learning through self-reflections and feedbacks with design-based curriculum course “Let’s just be human:” kindergarten teachers leveraging collegial supports during the first covid-19 school year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1