《流行城市:韩国大众文化与场所的销售》吴友正著(书评)

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Korean Studies Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1215/07311613-7686694
So-Rim Lee
{"title":"《流行城市:韩国大众文化与场所的销售》吴友正著(书评)","authors":"So-Rim Lee","doi":"10.1215/07311613-7686694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"were they more readily able to communicate directly with other neighboring groups like the Manchu, Jurchen, Khitan, Han, and Mongolian peoples, all groups that were either present in Northeast China or had some degree of socioeconomic interactions with the Koguryŏ people? I am sure that historians, political scientists, historical archaeologists, and historical linguists, to name but a few disciplines, would certainly have further questions. There is a great deal to like about the Xu text (much of which is noted above). If there was one weakness to note it would be that the paucity of figures and tables makes it a bit more difficult to follow the author’s line of thinking. Figures and tables, even in a text focused on ancient history, that would provide maps, diagrams of different relationships between different groups, and basic data (biographical information, regime changes, etc.) about some of the more important figures and events described would help break up the text a bit, while presenting essential information. Indeed, even some portraits of some of the key figures in the Koguryŏ debate would help the reader follow the dense, informative data that is presented. Visual reconstructions of Tan’gun and how these different entities interpreted the Tan’gun creation myth would have been particularly useful. Reconstructing Ancient Korean History would be best used as a supplementary text for an upper-division/graduate-level East Asian history course or as one of the primary texts for a course focused on Koguryŏ history (e.g., ancient Korean history). It should find its way to the bookshelf of every historian who specializes in ancient East Asian history and all university libraries that provide such coverage. This text would probably not be very appealing to the general Korean studies readership, though I do not see that as the intended audience for the book. The text is a valuable addition to the literature on ancient Korean history and how ancient history has been and could be used to promote particular nationalistic agendas.","PeriodicalId":43322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pop City: Korean Popular Culture and the Selling of Place by Youjeong Oh (review)\",\"authors\":\"So-Rim Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/07311613-7686694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"were they more readily able to communicate directly with other neighboring groups like the Manchu, Jurchen, Khitan, Han, and Mongolian peoples, all groups that were either present in Northeast China or had some degree of socioeconomic interactions with the Koguryŏ people? I am sure that historians, political scientists, historical archaeologists, and historical linguists, to name but a few disciplines, would certainly have further questions. There is a great deal to like about the Xu text (much of which is noted above). If there was one weakness to note it would be that the paucity of figures and tables makes it a bit more difficult to follow the author’s line of thinking. Figures and tables, even in a text focused on ancient history, that would provide maps, diagrams of different relationships between different groups, and basic data (biographical information, regime changes, etc.) about some of the more important figures and events described would help break up the text a bit, while presenting essential information. Indeed, even some portraits of some of the key figures in the Koguryŏ debate would help the reader follow the dense, informative data that is presented. Visual reconstructions of Tan’gun and how these different entities interpreted the Tan’gun creation myth would have been particularly useful. Reconstructing Ancient Korean History would be best used as a supplementary text for an upper-division/graduate-level East Asian history course or as one of the primary texts for a course focused on Koguryŏ history (e.g., ancient Korean history). It should find its way to the bookshelf of every historian who specializes in ancient East Asian history and all university libraries that provide such coverage. This text would probably not be very appealing to the general Korean studies readership, though I do not see that as the intended audience for the book. The text is a valuable addition to the literature on ancient Korean history and how ancient history has been and could be used to promote particular nationalistic agendas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/07311613-7686694\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/07311613-7686694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

他们是否更容易与其他邻近群体直接交流,如满族、女真族、契丹族、汉族人和蒙古人,所有这些群体要么存在于中国东北,要么与高句丽人有一定程度的社会经济互动?我相信,历史学家、政治学家、历史考古学家和历史语言学家,仅举几个学科的例子,肯定会有进一步的问题。许的文本有很多值得喜欢的地方(其中大部分在上面已经提到了)。如果说本书有什么不足之处的话,那就是图表的缺乏让读者很难理解作者的思路。即使是在古代史的文本中,图表和表格也会提供不同群体之间不同关系的地图和图表,以及一些更重要的人物和事件的基本数据(传记信息、政权更迭等),这有助于在呈现基本信息的同时将文本分割开来。事实上,即使是高句丽辩论中一些关键人物的肖像,也会帮助读者理解书中提供的密集而翔实的数据。对谭枪的视觉重建以及这些不同的实体如何解释谭枪创造神话将特别有用。《重建韩国古代史》最好作为高年级/研究生东亚史课程的补充教材,或作为高句丽史(如韩国古代史)课程的主要教材之一。每一位专门研究东亚古代史的历史学家,以及所有提供此类研究的大学图书馆,都应该把这本书放在书架上。这篇文章可能不会很吸引一般的韩国研究读者,尽管我不认为这是这本书的目标读者。该文本是关于韩国古代史的文献的宝贵补充,以及古代历史是如何被用来促进特定的民族主义议程的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pop City: Korean Popular Culture and the Selling of Place by Youjeong Oh (review)
were they more readily able to communicate directly with other neighboring groups like the Manchu, Jurchen, Khitan, Han, and Mongolian peoples, all groups that were either present in Northeast China or had some degree of socioeconomic interactions with the Koguryŏ people? I am sure that historians, political scientists, historical archaeologists, and historical linguists, to name but a few disciplines, would certainly have further questions. There is a great deal to like about the Xu text (much of which is noted above). If there was one weakness to note it would be that the paucity of figures and tables makes it a bit more difficult to follow the author’s line of thinking. Figures and tables, even in a text focused on ancient history, that would provide maps, diagrams of different relationships between different groups, and basic data (biographical information, regime changes, etc.) about some of the more important figures and events described would help break up the text a bit, while presenting essential information. Indeed, even some portraits of some of the key figures in the Koguryŏ debate would help the reader follow the dense, informative data that is presented. Visual reconstructions of Tan’gun and how these different entities interpreted the Tan’gun creation myth would have been particularly useful. Reconstructing Ancient Korean History would be best used as a supplementary text for an upper-division/graduate-level East Asian history course or as one of the primary texts for a course focused on Koguryŏ history (e.g., ancient Korean history). It should find its way to the bookshelf of every historian who specializes in ancient East Asian history and all university libraries that provide such coverage. This text would probably not be very appealing to the general Korean studies readership, though I do not see that as the intended audience for the book. The text is a valuable addition to the literature on ancient Korean history and how ancient history has been and could be used to promote particular nationalistic agendas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Editorial Note The Diary of 1636: The Second Manchu Invasion of Korea The South Korean Military Ideological Complex: Transcendent Nationalism in Military Moral Education Beyond Double Identity, beyond Periphery: Chinese Ethnic Korean Poetry as Borderland Literature The Checkpoint of History: Testimony and Intertextuality in the Documentary Literature of the Korean War, 1960s–1970s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1