中世纪晚期的领主治理与国家(14-16世纪)

IF 0.4 1区 历史学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Continuity and Change Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.1017/S0268416021000084
J. van der Meulen
{"title":"中世纪晚期的领主治理与国家(14-16世纪)","authors":"J. van der Meulen","doi":"10.1017/S0268416021000084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article charts the long-term development of seigneurial governance within the principality of Guelders in the Low Countries. Proceeding from four quantitative cross-sections (c. 1325, 1475, 1540, 1570) of seigneurial lordships, the conclusion is that seigneurial governance remained stable in late medieval Guelders. The central argument is that this persistence of seigneurial governance was an effect of active collaboration between princely administrations, lords, and local communities. Together, the princely government and seigneuries of Guelders formed an integrated, yet polycentric, state. The article thereby challenges the narrative of progressive state centralisation that predominates in the historiography of pre-modern state formation.","PeriodicalId":45309,"journal":{"name":"Continuity and Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0268416021000084","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seigneurial governance and the state in late medieval Guelders (14th–16th century)\",\"authors\":\"J. van der Meulen\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0268416021000084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article charts the long-term development of seigneurial governance within the principality of Guelders in the Low Countries. Proceeding from four quantitative cross-sections (c. 1325, 1475, 1540, 1570) of seigneurial lordships, the conclusion is that seigneurial governance remained stable in late medieval Guelders. The central argument is that this persistence of seigneurial governance was an effect of active collaboration between princely administrations, lords, and local communities. Together, the princely government and seigneuries of Guelders formed an integrated, yet polycentric, state. The article thereby challenges the narrative of progressive state centralisation that predominates in the historiography of pre-modern state formation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Continuity and Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0268416021000084\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Continuity and Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416021000084\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuity and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416021000084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文描绘了低地诸侯国内部领主治理的长期发展。从领主的四个定量横截面(约1325、1475、1540、1570)出发,得出的结论是,中世纪晚期的盖尔德王朝统治保持稳定。核心论点是,这种持续的封建统治是王子政府、领主和地方社区之间积极合作的结果。王子政府和盖尔德王朝共同形成了一个一体化但多中心的国家。因此,这篇文章挑战了在前现代国家形成史学中占主导地位的进步国家中央集权的叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Seigneurial governance and the state in late medieval Guelders (14th–16th century)
Abstract This article charts the long-term development of seigneurial governance within the principality of Guelders in the Low Countries. Proceeding from four quantitative cross-sections (c. 1325, 1475, 1540, 1570) of seigneurial lordships, the conclusion is that seigneurial governance remained stable in late medieval Guelders. The central argument is that this persistence of seigneurial governance was an effect of active collaboration between princely administrations, lords, and local communities. Together, the princely government and seigneuries of Guelders formed an integrated, yet polycentric, state. The article thereby challenges the narrative of progressive state centralisation that predominates in the historiography of pre-modern state formation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Continuity and Change
Continuity and Change SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Continuity and Change aims to define a field of historical sociology concerned with long-term continuities and discontinuities in the structures of past societies. Emphasis is upon studies whose agenda or methodology combines elements from traditional fields such as history, sociology, law, demography, economics or anthropology, or ranges freely between them. There is a strong commitment to comparative studies over a broad range of cultures and time spans.
期刊最新文献
Mariana P. Candido, Wealth, Land, and Property in Angola. A History of Dispossession, Slavery and Inequality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022). Pages xiv + 323 + figures 17 + tables 12. F. Barry, Industry and Policy in Independent Ireland, 1922–1972 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023). Pages xiv + 232 + 65 tables. £49.00 hardback. Midwives’ oaths: everyday life and the law in seventeenth-century England D. Menjot, M. Caesar, F. Garnier and P. Verdés Pijuan (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Public Taxation in Medieval Europe (London and New York: Routledge, 2023). Pages xiv + 497. £152.00 hardback. Gregory Hanlon, Death and Control in the West, 1500–1800: Sex Ratios at Baptism in Italy, France and England (New York: Routledge, 2023). Pages XIX + 307 + 18 Figures + 65 Graphs + 2 Maps. $39.16 paperback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1