国际瘙痒研究论坛(IFSI)特别兴趣小组“问卷”对瘙痒问卷的系统回顾

F. Dominick, A. V. Van Laarhoven, A. Evers, E. Weisshaar
{"title":"国际瘙痒研究论坛(IFSI)特别兴趣小组“问卷”对瘙痒问卷的系统回顾","authors":"F. Dominick, A. V. Van Laarhoven, A. Evers, E. Weisshaar","doi":"10.1097/itx.0000000000000026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Introduction: Itch can be perceived differently across patients and it can affect daily life in various ways. It is essential to assess those aspects that are relevant for the individual patient’s needs to improve treatment of patients suffering from acute or chronic itch. The International Forum for the Study on Itch (IFSI) Special Interest Group on “Questionnaires” aims to propose tools to assess different dimensions of itch and improve patient care. As a first step, this study aimed at a systematically reviewing existing patients’ self-report questionnaires on itch. Materials and methods: The databases PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were systematically searched for any scientific publication describing patients’ self-report questionnaires that assess itch-related information (≥2 items). Information about the publication was extracted by 2 experts as well as which of the 14 predefined dimensions of itch (by the IFSI Special Interest Group) were assessed within the questionnaire, for instance, duration of itch, itch aggravating or relieving factors, and effects on quality of life. Results: From a total of 5282 records, 58 articles were derived describing 62 questionnaires. Over half of the questionnaires were developed for dermatological conditions, and the vast majority targeted at adults. Most questionnaires address itch-related disability and itch intensity. Affective qualities of itch, coping with itch, response to current itch treatment, and the opinion on the origin of itch are infrequently asked for. Discussion: The number and content of the items within a dimension vary greatly. Measurement properties of the questionnaires were not systematically addressed, as these were often not reported in the original publication. Future research should focus on selecting adequate and reliable (sub)scales to develop a modular questionnaire system in order to uniformly assess the individual patient’s demands and improve care.","PeriodicalId":73523,"journal":{"name":"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":"4 1","pages":"e26 - e26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/itx.0000000000000026","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of questionnaires on itch by the Special Interest Group “Questionnaires” of the International Forum for the Study of Itch (IFSI)\",\"authors\":\"F. Dominick, A. V. Van Laarhoven, A. Evers, E. Weisshaar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/itx.0000000000000026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Introduction: Itch can be perceived differently across patients and it can affect daily life in various ways. It is essential to assess those aspects that are relevant for the individual patient’s needs to improve treatment of patients suffering from acute or chronic itch. The International Forum for the Study on Itch (IFSI) Special Interest Group on “Questionnaires” aims to propose tools to assess different dimensions of itch and improve patient care. As a first step, this study aimed at a systematically reviewing existing patients’ self-report questionnaires on itch. Materials and methods: The databases PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were systematically searched for any scientific publication describing patients’ self-report questionnaires that assess itch-related information (≥2 items). Information about the publication was extracted by 2 experts as well as which of the 14 predefined dimensions of itch (by the IFSI Special Interest Group) were assessed within the questionnaire, for instance, duration of itch, itch aggravating or relieving factors, and effects on quality of life. Results: From a total of 5282 records, 58 articles were derived describing 62 questionnaires. Over half of the questionnaires were developed for dermatological conditions, and the vast majority targeted at adults. Most questionnaires address itch-related disability and itch intensity. Affective qualities of itch, coping with itch, response to current itch treatment, and the opinion on the origin of itch are infrequently asked for. Discussion: The number and content of the items within a dimension vary greatly. Measurement properties of the questionnaires were not systematically addressed, as these were often not reported in the original publication. Future research should focus on selecting adequate and reliable (sub)scales to develop a modular questionnaire system in order to uniformly assess the individual patient’s demands and improve care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"e26 - e26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/itx.0000000000000026\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/itx.0000000000000026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Itch (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/itx.0000000000000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

文本中提供了补充数字内容。引言:瘙痒在患者中的感知方式不同,它会以各种方式影响日常生活。评估那些与患者个体需求相关的方面对于改善急性或慢性瘙痒患者的治疗至关重要。国际瘙痒研究论坛(IFSI)“问卷调查”特别兴趣小组旨在提出评估瘙痒不同方面并改善患者护理的工具。作为第一步,本研究旨在系统地回顾现有患者关于瘙痒的自我报告问卷。材料和方法:系统地检索PubMed、PsycINFO和CINAHL数据库中描述患者自我报告问卷的任何科学出版物,这些问卷评估瘙痒相关信息(≥2项)。2位专家提取了有关该出版物的信息,以及在问卷中评估了瘙痒的14个预定义维度中的哪一个(由IFSI特殊兴趣小组),例如瘙痒的持续时间、瘙痒加剧或缓解因素以及对生活质量的影响。结果:从5282份记录中,共获得58篇文章,描述了62份问卷。超过一半的调查问卷是针对皮肤病制定的,绝大多数是针对成年人的。大多数调查问卷都涉及与瘙痒相关的残疾和瘙痒强度。瘙痒的情感品质、应对瘙痒、对当前瘙痒治疗的反应以及对瘙痒起源的看法很少被问及。讨论:一个维度中项目的数量和内容差异很大。调查问卷的测量特性没有得到系统的处理,因为原始出版物中往往没有报告这些特性。未来的研究应侧重于选择足够和可靠的(子)量表,以开发模块化问卷系统,从而统一评估患者的需求并改善护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of questionnaires on itch by the Special Interest Group “Questionnaires” of the International Forum for the Study of Itch (IFSI)
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Introduction: Itch can be perceived differently across patients and it can affect daily life in various ways. It is essential to assess those aspects that are relevant for the individual patient’s needs to improve treatment of patients suffering from acute or chronic itch. The International Forum for the Study on Itch (IFSI) Special Interest Group on “Questionnaires” aims to propose tools to assess different dimensions of itch and improve patient care. As a first step, this study aimed at a systematically reviewing existing patients’ self-report questionnaires on itch. Materials and methods: The databases PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were systematically searched for any scientific publication describing patients’ self-report questionnaires that assess itch-related information (≥2 items). Information about the publication was extracted by 2 experts as well as which of the 14 predefined dimensions of itch (by the IFSI Special Interest Group) were assessed within the questionnaire, for instance, duration of itch, itch aggravating or relieving factors, and effects on quality of life. Results: From a total of 5282 records, 58 articles were derived describing 62 questionnaires. Over half of the questionnaires were developed for dermatological conditions, and the vast majority targeted at adults. Most questionnaires address itch-related disability and itch intensity. Affective qualities of itch, coping with itch, response to current itch treatment, and the opinion on the origin of itch are infrequently asked for. Discussion: The number and content of the items within a dimension vary greatly. Measurement properties of the questionnaires were not systematically addressed, as these were often not reported in the original publication. Future research should focus on selecting adequate and reliable (sub)scales to develop a modular questionnaire system in order to uniformly assess the individual patient’s demands and improve care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real-world clinical efficacy of nemolizumab in Japanese patients with atopic dermatitis Kappa opioid agonists in the treatment of itch: just scratching the surface? Oral administration of 4′-demethyl nobiletin inhibits dry skin-induced mechanical alloknesis The effect of repetitive topical applications of local anesthetics (EMLA) on experimental pain and itch (histaminergic and nonhistaminergic) Potential antipruritic neuronal targets of nalfurafine in the murine spinal dorsal horn
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1