认识到高等教育中的基督教复杂性和世俗特权:对最近基督教特权争论的回应

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Religion & Education Pub Date : 2022-03-22 DOI:10.1080/15507394.2022.2051973
Perry L. Glanzer
{"title":"认识到高等教育中的基督教复杂性和世俗特权:对最近基督教特权争论的回应","authors":"Perry L. Glanzer","doi":"10.1080/15507394.2022.2051973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although scholars have recognized the problem of Christian privilege (CP) in higher education, their arguments contain two major problems. First, they often fail to acknowledge the diverse experience and outlook of different Christian groups regarding privilege. Second, there is a failure to acknowledge secular privilege. This paper demonstrates these problems and maintains that CP arguments that fail to acknowledge these points weaken the case for justice toward worldviews. Thus, educators need to take into account these points if they want to commit to creating the structures and conditions by which a just form of pluralism can flourish in higher education.","PeriodicalId":43359,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognizing Christian Complexity and Secular Privilege in Higher Education: A Response to Recent Christian Privilege Arguments\",\"authors\":\"Perry L. Glanzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15507394.2022.2051973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Although scholars have recognized the problem of Christian privilege (CP) in higher education, their arguments contain two major problems. First, they often fail to acknowledge the diverse experience and outlook of different Christian groups regarding privilege. Second, there is a failure to acknowledge secular privilege. This paper demonstrates these problems and maintains that CP arguments that fail to acknowledge these points weaken the case for justice toward worldviews. Thus, educators need to take into account these points if they want to commit to creating the structures and conditions by which a just form of pluralism can flourish in higher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion & Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2022.2051973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2022.2051973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

虽然学者们已经认识到高等教育中的基督教特权问题,但他们的论点包含两个主要问题。首先,他们往往没有认识到不同的基督教团体对特权的不同经历和看法。第二,没有承认世俗特权。本文论证了这些问题,并认为不承认这些问题的CP论点削弱了对世界观的正义。因此,如果教育工作者想要致力于创造结构和条件,使一种公正的多元化形式能够在高等教育中蓬勃发展,他们就需要考虑到这些要点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recognizing Christian Complexity and Secular Privilege in Higher Education: A Response to Recent Christian Privilege Arguments
Abstract Although scholars have recognized the problem of Christian privilege (CP) in higher education, their arguments contain two major problems. First, they often fail to acknowledge the diverse experience and outlook of different Christian groups regarding privilege. Second, there is a failure to acknowledge secular privilege. This paper demonstrates these problems and maintains that CP arguments that fail to acknowledge these points weaken the case for justice toward worldviews. Thus, educators need to take into account these points if they want to commit to creating the structures and conditions by which a just form of pluralism can flourish in higher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
50 Years of Religion & Education: The Origins of the Journal and the Interdisciplinary Study of Religion and Education Religion, Education, and the Future of Democratic Pluralism Review: Spirituality That Makes a Difference, by Charles R. Kniker, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022; ISBN: 978-1-6667-1789-1 “One More Thing”: Clarifying the Evidence Around Christian Privilege in Higher Education Catholic and Public Schools Compared: Examining Achievement Growth in an Urban Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1