{"title":"近代早期英国法庭的印象管理","authors":"D. Archer","doi":"10.1075/JHP.00019.ARC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper draws upon three texts from the trial section of the Corpus of English Dialogues, in\n order to explore the tactical impression management strategies used by Early Modern English courtroom participants (defendants,\n judges, lawyers and witnesses). I will demonstrate that modern impression management strategies (identified with other activity\n types in mind) are in evidence in the texts, as are additional courtroom-specific strategies. I discuss the nuances of these\n impression management tactics, in light of (a) the obvious power differences between the participants involved, (b) the need to be\n perceived as credible in this legal setting, and (c) their convergence with particular types of face(work).","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/JHP.00019.ARC","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impression management in the Early Modern English courtroom\",\"authors\":\"D. Archer\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/JHP.00019.ARC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper draws upon three texts from the trial section of the Corpus of English Dialogues, in\\n order to explore the tactical impression management strategies used by Early Modern English courtroom participants (defendants,\\n judges, lawyers and witnesses). I will demonstrate that modern impression management strategies (identified with other activity\\n types in mind) are in evidence in the texts, as are additional courtroom-specific strategies. I discuss the nuances of these\\n impression management tactics, in light of (a) the obvious power differences between the participants involved, (b) the need to be\\n perceived as credible in this legal setting, and (c) their convergence with particular types of face(work).\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1075/JHP.00019.ARC\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.00019.ARC\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHP.00019.ARC","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impression management in the Early Modern English courtroom
This paper draws upon three texts from the trial section of the Corpus of English Dialogues, in
order to explore the tactical impression management strategies used by Early Modern English courtroom participants (defendants,
judges, lawyers and witnesses). I will demonstrate that modern impression management strategies (identified with other activity
types in mind) are in evidence in the texts, as are additional courtroom-specific strategies. I discuss the nuances of these
impression management tactics, in light of (a) the obvious power differences between the participants involved, (b) the need to be
perceived as credible in this legal setting, and (c) their convergence with particular types of face(work).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.