{"title":"改革医学院聘任制文化","authors":"J. A. Teixeira da Silva","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1761462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A fairly recent paper published in the Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences attempted to provide improved and re fi ned suggestions, based on a survey with a limited number of respondents ( n ¼ 182), on how to improve the faculty promotion criteria as suggested by the Medical Council of India (MCI). 1 The objectives of that paper were noble, providing a fi ner-scale “ reward ” scale for different manuscript types","PeriodicalId":53332,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences India","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reforming the Culture of Medical Faculty Promotion and Appointment\",\"authors\":\"J. A. Teixeira da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1761462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A fairly recent paper published in the Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences attempted to provide improved and re fi ned suggestions, based on a survey with a limited number of respondents ( n ¼ 182), on how to improve the faculty promotion criteria as suggested by the Medical Council of India (MCI). 1 The objectives of that paper were noble, providing a fi ner-scale “ reward ” scale for different manuscript types\",\"PeriodicalId\":53332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences India\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reforming the Culture of Medical Faculty Promotion and Appointment
A fairly recent paper published in the Annals of the National Academy of Medical Sciences attempted to provide improved and re fi ned suggestions, based on a survey with a limited number of respondents ( n ¼ 182), on how to improve the faculty promotion criteria as suggested by the Medical Council of India (MCI). 1 The objectives of that paper were noble, providing a fi ner-scale “ reward ” scale for different manuscript types