{"title":"文化-历史格式塔理论及其超越:需要一部关于知识分子“非正式人际网络”的新历史(和理论)","authors":"A. Yasnitsky","doi":"10.2478/gth-2021-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These three mechanisms seem to be the main causes of the varieties of the Gestalt theory as evidenced in countless and diverse “receptions” of the theory; therefore, a deep understanding of the mechanisms and perfect skills of scholarly discourse “deconstruction”, coupled with cultural–historical textological and textual “ar-cheology” are needed to get rid of distortions and (re)produce the ideas in their immaculate and purified form as meant by their originators.","PeriodicalId":33799,"journal":{"name":"Gestalt Theory","volume":"43 1","pages":"279 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural–Historical Gestalt Theory and Beyond: A New History (and Theory) of the “Informal Personal Network” of Intellectuals Is Needed\",\"authors\":\"A. Yasnitsky\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/gth-2021-0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"These three mechanisms seem to be the main causes of the varieties of the Gestalt theory as evidenced in countless and diverse “receptions” of the theory; therefore, a deep understanding of the mechanisms and perfect skills of scholarly discourse “deconstruction”, coupled with cultural–historical textological and textual “ar-cheology” are needed to get rid of distortions and (re)produce the ideas in their immaculate and purified form as meant by their originators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gestalt Theory\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"279 - 292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gestalt Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2021-0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestalt Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2021-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cultural–Historical Gestalt Theory and Beyond: A New History (and Theory) of the “Informal Personal Network” of Intellectuals Is Needed
These three mechanisms seem to be the main causes of the varieties of the Gestalt theory as evidenced in countless and diverse “receptions” of the theory; therefore, a deep understanding of the mechanisms and perfect skills of scholarly discourse “deconstruction”, coupled with cultural–historical textological and textual “ar-cheology” are needed to get rid of distortions and (re)produce the ideas in their immaculate and purified form as meant by their originators.