文化-历史格式塔理论及其超越:需要一部关于知识分子“非正式人际网络”的新历史(和理论)

A. Yasnitsky
{"title":"文化-历史格式塔理论及其超越:需要一部关于知识分子“非正式人际网络”的新历史(和理论)","authors":"A. Yasnitsky","doi":"10.2478/gth-2021-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These three mechanisms seem to be the main causes of the varieties of the Gestalt theory as evidenced in countless and diverse “receptions” of the theory; therefore, a deep understanding of the mechanisms and perfect skills of scholarly discourse “deconstruction”, coupled with cultural–historical textological and textual “ar-cheology” are needed to get rid of distortions and (re)produce the ideas in their immaculate and purified form as meant by their originators.","PeriodicalId":33799,"journal":{"name":"Gestalt Theory","volume":"43 1","pages":"279 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural–Historical Gestalt Theory and Beyond: A New History (and Theory) of the “Informal Personal Network” of Intellectuals Is Needed\",\"authors\":\"A. Yasnitsky\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/gth-2021-0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"These three mechanisms seem to be the main causes of the varieties of the Gestalt theory as evidenced in countless and diverse “receptions” of the theory; therefore, a deep understanding of the mechanisms and perfect skills of scholarly discourse “deconstruction”, coupled with cultural–historical textological and textual “ar-cheology” are needed to get rid of distortions and (re)produce the ideas in their immaculate and purified form as meant by their originators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gestalt Theory\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"279 - 292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gestalt Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2021-0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestalt Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2021-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这三种机制似乎是格式塔理论多样化的主要原因,正如对该理论无数种多样的“接受”所证明的那样;因此,需要深入理解学术话语解构的机制和完善的技巧,再加上文化历史文本学和文本解构主义,才能摆脱扭曲,(重新)以其创始人所指的完美和纯粹的形式产生思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cultural–Historical Gestalt Theory and Beyond: A New History (and Theory) of the “Informal Personal Network” of Intellectuals Is Needed
These three mechanisms seem to be the main causes of the varieties of the Gestalt theory as evidenced in countless and diverse “receptions” of the theory; therefore, a deep understanding of the mechanisms and perfect skills of scholarly discourse “deconstruction”, coupled with cultural–historical textological and textual “ar-cheology” are needed to get rid of distortions and (re)produce the ideas in their immaculate and purified form as meant by their originators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Elders’ experience with augmented gaze: preliminary observations Obituary for Michael Wertheimer (1927 - 2022) Reconstructed multisensoriality. Reading The Catcher in the Rye Nachruf auf Michael Wertheimer (1927 - 2022) Language and Speech as Open, Context-dependent Wholes. A view from Prague
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1