项目反应理论在wet - kampfangst- inventar - state (WAI-S)测评中的应用

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie Pub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI:10.1026/1612-5010/a000384
Mengkai Luan, Jörg-Henrik Heine, Xin Chen, Felix Ehrlenspiel
{"title":"项目反应理论在wet - kampfangst- inventar - state (WAI-S)测评中的应用","authors":"Mengkai Luan, Jörg-Henrik Heine, Xin Chen, Felix Ehrlenspiel","doi":"10.1026/1612-5010/a000384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Research investigating competitive anxiety is typically based on the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 ( Martens, Burton et al., 1990 ), its revision, or its derivatives in other languages. The psychometric quality of these scales as a whole has been determined according to classic test theory but it has not been assessed at the item level. Thus, the present research assessed the psychometric properties of the German derivative of this instrument, the German Wettkampfangst-Inventar-State (WAI-S; Ehrlenspiel et al., 2009 ) at the item level and tested a revised and extended version of the WAI-S by using an analytical approach based on item response theory. In Study 1, graded response models (GRMs) were fitted to the three subscales of the WAI-S using the original dataset collected for its development. We provided evidence indicating the sufficient psychometric properties of the somatic subscale, but we also identified some unfavorable properties of items in the cognitive anxiety and the self-confidence subscales. Thus, in Study 2, a revised and extended 16-item version of the WAI-S with 10 new items was generated and administered to a new sample of 322 German athletes. On the basis of the GRM results, we identified items with poor quality. We subsequently selected 12 appropriate items to generate a revised version of the WAI-S with stronger psychometric properties than the original instrument. We believe that the revised version of the WAI-S will increase the usability of competitive state anxiety assessments in both research and practice.","PeriodicalId":43878,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying Item Response Theory to the Evaluation and Revision of the Wettkampfangst-Inventar-State (WAI-S)\",\"authors\":\"Mengkai Luan, Jörg-Henrik Heine, Xin Chen, Felix Ehrlenspiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1026/1612-5010/a000384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Research investigating competitive anxiety is typically based on the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 ( Martens, Burton et al., 1990 ), its revision, or its derivatives in other languages. The psychometric quality of these scales as a whole has been determined according to classic test theory but it has not been assessed at the item level. Thus, the present research assessed the psychometric properties of the German derivative of this instrument, the German Wettkampfangst-Inventar-State (WAI-S; Ehrlenspiel et al., 2009 ) at the item level and tested a revised and extended version of the WAI-S by using an analytical approach based on item response theory. In Study 1, graded response models (GRMs) were fitted to the three subscales of the WAI-S using the original dataset collected for its development. We provided evidence indicating the sufficient psychometric properties of the somatic subscale, but we also identified some unfavorable properties of items in the cognitive anxiety and the self-confidence subscales. Thus, in Study 2, a revised and extended 16-item version of the WAI-S with 10 new items was generated and administered to a new sample of 322 German athletes. On the basis of the GRM results, we identified items with poor quality. We subsequently selected 12 appropriate items to generate a revised version of the WAI-S with stronger psychometric properties than the original instrument. We believe that the revised version of the WAI-S will increase the usability of competitive state anxiety assessments in both research and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010/a000384\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010/a000384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:对竞争焦虑的研究通常基于《竞争状态焦虑量表-2》(Martens, Burton et al., 1990)、其修订版或其他语言版本。这些量表的整体心理测量质量是根据经典测试理论确定的,但尚未在项目水平上进行评估。因此,本研究评估了该工具的德国衍生品的心理测量特性,德国Wettkampfangst-Inventar-State (WAI-S;Ehrlenspiel et al., 2009)在项目水平上进行测试,并使用基于项目反应理论的分析方法测试了WAI-S的修订和扩展版本。在研究1中,使用为开发WAI-S而收集的原始数据集,将分级反应模型(GRMs)拟合到WAI-S的三个子量表上。我们提供的证据表明躯体分量表具有足够的心理测量特性,但我们也发现了认知焦虑和自信分量表中项目的一些不利特性。因此,在研究2中,修订和扩展了WAI-S的16个项目版本,增加了10个新项目,并对322名德国运动员的新样本进行了管理。在GRM结果的基础上,我们确定了质量较差的项目。随后,我们选择了12个合适的项目来生成一个比原始工具更强的心理测量特性的WAI-S修订版。我们相信,WAI-S的修订版将增加竞争状态焦虑评估在研究和实践中的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applying Item Response Theory to the Evaluation and Revision of the Wettkampfangst-Inventar-State (WAI-S)
Abstract: Research investigating competitive anxiety is typically based on the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 ( Martens, Burton et al., 1990 ), its revision, or its derivatives in other languages. The psychometric quality of these scales as a whole has been determined according to classic test theory but it has not been assessed at the item level. Thus, the present research assessed the psychometric properties of the German derivative of this instrument, the German Wettkampfangst-Inventar-State (WAI-S; Ehrlenspiel et al., 2009 ) at the item level and tested a revised and extended version of the WAI-S by using an analytical approach based on item response theory. In Study 1, graded response models (GRMs) were fitted to the three subscales of the WAI-S using the original dataset collected for its development. We provided evidence indicating the sufficient psychometric properties of the somatic subscale, but we also identified some unfavorable properties of items in the cognitive anxiety and the self-confidence subscales. Thus, in Study 2, a revised and extended 16-item version of the WAI-S with 10 new items was generated and administered to a new sample of 322 German athletes. On the basis of the GRM results, we identified items with poor quality. We subsequently selected 12 appropriate items to generate a revised version of the WAI-S with stronger psychometric properties than the original instrument. We believe that the revised version of the WAI-S will increase the usability of competitive state anxiety assessments in both research and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie
Zeitschrift Fur Sportpsychologie PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Gender Data Gap im Sport – Geschlechtsspezifische und individualisierte Ansätze in Training und Wettkampf Are International PhD Courses an Important Part of PhD Education in Sport and Exercise Psychology? Nachrichten aus der asp Heimvorteil erklärt: Das Home Advantage Mediated (HAM) Modell Wenn Missbrauchsfälle auch mit Strukturanalyse zu tun haben
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1