低潮气量保护性肺通气与压力控制通气对妇科腹腔镜手术患者氧合的影响

Mamtili Ilyar, L. Wang, Chun-lin Ge
{"title":"低潮气量保护性肺通气与压力控制通气对妇科腹腔镜手术患者氧合的影响","authors":"Mamtili Ilyar, L. Wang, Chun-lin Ge","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4378.2020.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low tidal volume protective lung ventilation (PLV) and pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 144 patients who were scheduled for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in our hospital were enrolled. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups (n=72): a PLV group and a PCV group. The PLV group used a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg, an inspiration and expiration ratio of 1∶2, a respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, and a positive end expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa). In the PCV group, the ventilation pressure was maintained at a tidal volume of 8 ml/kg, with an inspiration and expiration ratio of 1∶2, and a respiratory rate of 12-16 breaths per minute. Their airway peak pressure (Ppeak) and mean airway pressure (Pmean) were recorded 5 min after tracheal intubation (T1), 10 min after pneumoperitoneum (T2), 20 min af-ter pneumoperitoneum (T3), and 10 min after pneumonectomy (T4), while dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) was calculated. Blood gas analysis was performed at T3 and T4 to record arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), arterial CO2 partial pressure (PaCO2), and alveolar-arterial oxygen partial pressure difference (A-aDO2), while oxygenation index (OI) was calculated. \n \n \nResults \nAt T3, the PLV group presented remarkably increased Ppeak and Pmean and decreased Cdyn, compared with the PCV group (P 0.05). There was no significant differ-ence in the incidence of respiratory complications and the length of hospitalization stay between the two groups (P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nFor patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, PCV is helpful to maintain stable respiratory dynamics, while low tidal volume PLV is helpful to maintain oxygenation function during surgery. There is no significant difference in safety be-tween the two types of treatment. \n \n \nKey words: \nGynaecology; Laparoscopy; Protective lung ventilation mode; Pressure controlled ventilation; Oxygenation function","PeriodicalId":13847,"journal":{"name":"国际麻醉学与复苏杂志","volume":"41 1","pages":"249-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of low tidal volume protective lung ventilation versus pressure controlled ventilation on oxygenation in patients un-dergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery\",\"authors\":\"Mamtili Ilyar, L. Wang, Chun-lin Ge\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4378.2020.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low tidal volume protective lung ventilation (PLV) and pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA total of 144 patients who were scheduled for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in our hospital were enrolled. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups (n=72): a PLV group and a PCV group. The PLV group used a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg, an inspiration and expiration ratio of 1∶2, a respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, and a positive end expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa). In the PCV group, the ventilation pressure was maintained at a tidal volume of 8 ml/kg, with an inspiration and expiration ratio of 1∶2, and a respiratory rate of 12-16 breaths per minute. Their airway peak pressure (Ppeak) and mean airway pressure (Pmean) were recorded 5 min after tracheal intubation (T1), 10 min after pneumoperitoneum (T2), 20 min af-ter pneumoperitoneum (T3), and 10 min after pneumonectomy (T4), while dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) was calculated. Blood gas analysis was performed at T3 and T4 to record arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), arterial CO2 partial pressure (PaCO2), and alveolar-arterial oxygen partial pressure difference (A-aDO2), while oxygenation index (OI) was calculated. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAt T3, the PLV group presented remarkably increased Ppeak and Pmean and decreased Cdyn, compared with the PCV group (P 0.05). There was no significant differ-ence in the incidence of respiratory complications and the length of hospitalization stay between the two groups (P>0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nFor patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, PCV is helpful to maintain stable respiratory dynamics, while low tidal volume PLV is helpful to maintain oxygenation function during surgery. There is no significant difference in safety be-tween the two types of treatment. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nGynaecology; Laparoscopy; Protective lung ventilation mode; Pressure controlled ventilation; Oxygenation function\",\"PeriodicalId\":13847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"国际麻醉学与复苏杂志\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"249-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"国际麻醉学与复苏杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4378.2020.03.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"国际麻醉学与复苏杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4378.2020.03.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价低潮气量保护性肺通气(PLV)和压力控制通气(PCV)在妇科腹腔镜手术中的有效性和安全性。方法选择144例在我院行妇科腹腔镜手术的患者。根据随机数字表法将患者分为两组(n=72): PLV组和PCV组。PLV组采用潮气量6 ml/kg,吸气呼气比1∶2,呼吸频率16次/ min,呼气末正压5 cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa)。PCV组通气压力维持潮气量8 ml/kg,吸气呼气比为1∶2,呼吸频率为12 ~ 16次/ min。分别记录气管插管后5分钟(T1)、气腹后10分钟(T2)、气腹后20分钟(T3)、全肺切除后10分钟(T4)气道峰值压(Ppeak)和平均气道压力(Pmean),并计算肺动态顺应性(Cdyn)。T3、T4进行血气分析,记录动脉氧分压(PaO2)、动脉氧分压(PaCO2)、肺泡-动脉氧分压差(A-aDO2),计算氧合指数(OI)。结果T3时,与PCV组比较,PLV组Ppeak、Pmean升高,Cdyn降低(P < 0.05)。两组患者呼吸系统并发症发生率及住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论对于妇科腹腔镜手术患者,术中PCV有助于维持稳定的呼吸动力学,低潮气量PLV有助于维持术中氧合功能。两种治疗方法在安全性上没有显著差异。关键词:妇科;腹腔镜检查;保护性肺通气模式;压控通风;氧化功能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of low tidal volume protective lung ventilation versus pressure controlled ventilation on oxygenation in patients un-dergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low tidal volume protective lung ventilation (PLV) and pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Methods A total of 144 patients who were scheduled for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in our hospital were enrolled. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups (n=72): a PLV group and a PCV group. The PLV group used a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg, an inspiration and expiration ratio of 1∶2, a respiratory rate of 16 breaths per minute, and a positive end expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa). In the PCV group, the ventilation pressure was maintained at a tidal volume of 8 ml/kg, with an inspiration and expiration ratio of 1∶2, and a respiratory rate of 12-16 breaths per minute. Their airway peak pressure (Ppeak) and mean airway pressure (Pmean) were recorded 5 min after tracheal intubation (T1), 10 min after pneumoperitoneum (T2), 20 min af-ter pneumoperitoneum (T3), and 10 min after pneumonectomy (T4), while dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) was calculated. Blood gas analysis was performed at T3 and T4 to record arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), arterial CO2 partial pressure (PaCO2), and alveolar-arterial oxygen partial pressure difference (A-aDO2), while oxygenation index (OI) was calculated. Results At T3, the PLV group presented remarkably increased Ppeak and Pmean and decreased Cdyn, compared with the PCV group (P 0.05). There was no significant differ-ence in the incidence of respiratory complications and the length of hospitalization stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions For patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, PCV is helpful to maintain stable respiratory dynamics, while low tidal volume PLV is helpful to maintain oxygenation function during surgery. There is no significant difference in safety be-tween the two types of treatment. Key words: Gynaecology; Laparoscopy; Protective lung ventilation mode; Pressure controlled ventilation; Oxygenation function
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7758
期刊最新文献
Research progress on cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in acute respiratory distress syndrome Accuracy of invasive systolic pressure variation in monitoring the volume responsiveness of patients under pneumoperitoneum Research progress on blood-brain barrier damage in the pathogenesis of postoperative delirium Comparison of the application of cuffed or uncuffed endotracheal tubes in full-term newborns undergoing congenital intestinal atresia surgery Research progress on the clinical application of apneic oxygenation technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1