Zulvikar Syambani Ulhaq, Ferry Nur Nasyroh, Amalia Nur Aisa, Achmad Arief Hidayatullah, Lola Ayu Istifiani, Syafrizal Aji Pamungkas, Achmad Rilyadi Sholeh, Gita Vita Soraya
{"title":"在线与混合临床技能实验室(CSL)学习对学生学业成绩的影响:印度尼西亚的案例研究","authors":"Zulvikar Syambani Ulhaq, Ferry Nur Nasyroh, Amalia Nur Aisa, Achmad Arief Hidayatullah, Lola Ayu Istifiani, Syafrizal Aji Pamungkas, Achmad Rilyadi Sholeh, Gita Vita Soraya","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Online and blended learning methods have experienced rapid growth in higher education due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study aimed to compare students' academic performance between online and blended Clinical Skill Laboratories (CSL) learning in undergraduate medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 101 undergraduate medical students at Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University, Malang, Indonesia, were enrolled (50 students from the academic year 2020 [group 1: online CSL]; 51 students from the academic year 2020 [group 2: blended CSL]). The main outcome was students' academic performance collected from the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) score. Additionally, students also completed an evaluation questionnaire to assess the quality of the learning scheme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups agreed that CSL is an important subject and clinical video demonstration is useful for their OSCE preparation. However, students who received online learning felt that online CSL was ineffective and scored lower in the OSCE compared to the blended CSL. Qualitative data also supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blended learning provides more value than online learning in terms of teaching clinical skills for undergraduate medical students. Additionally, online CSL may not be sufficient for medical students to attain critical skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Online vs Blended Clinical Skill Laboratory Learning on Student Academic Performance: A Case Study in Indonesia.\",\"authors\":\"Zulvikar Syambani Ulhaq, Ferry Nur Nasyroh, Amalia Nur Aisa, Achmad Arief Hidayatullah, Lola Ayu Istifiani, Syafrizal Aji Pamungkas, Achmad Rilyadi Sholeh, Gita Vita Soraya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Online and blended learning methods have experienced rapid growth in higher education due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study aimed to compare students' academic performance between online and blended Clinical Skill Laboratories (CSL) learning in undergraduate medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 101 undergraduate medical students at Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University, Malang, Indonesia, were enrolled (50 students from the academic year 2020 [group 1: online CSL]; 51 students from the academic year 2020 [group 2: blended CSL]). The main outcome was students' academic performance collected from the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) score. Additionally, students also completed an evaluation questionnaire to assess the quality of the learning scheme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups agreed that CSL is an important subject and clinical video demonstration is useful for their OSCE preparation. However, students who received online learning felt that online CSL was ineffective and scored lower in the OSCE compared to the blended CSL. Qualitative data also supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blended learning provides more value than online learning in terms of teaching clinical skills for undergraduate medical students. Additionally, online CSL may not be sufficient for medical students to attain critical skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of medicine open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256266/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of medicine open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medicine open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的：由于 COVID-19 的流行，在线和混合式学习方法在高等教育中得到了快速发展。我们的研究旨在比较医学本科生在线学习和混合式临床技能实验室（CSL）学习的学生学业成绩：印度尼西亚玛琅毛拉纳-马利克-易卜拉欣国立伊斯兰大学（Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University, Malang, Indonesia）共招收了101名医学本科生（2020学年50人[第一组：在线CSL]；2020学年51人[第二组：混合CSL]）。主要结果是从客观结构化临床考试（OSCE）成绩中收集的学生学习成绩。此外，学生还填写了一份评估问卷，以评估学习计划的质量：结果：两组学生都认为 CSL 是一门重要的学科，临床视频演示对他们的 OSCE 准备很有帮助。然而，与混合式 CSL 相比，接受在线学习的学生认为在线 CSL 效果不佳，在 OSCE 中得分较低。定性数据也支持这些发现：结论：就本科医学生的临床技能教学而言，混合式学习比在线学习更有价值。此外，在线 CSL 可能不足以让医学生获得关键技能。
The Impact of Online vs Blended Clinical Skill Laboratory Learning on Student Academic Performance: A Case Study in Indonesia.
Objective: Online and blended learning methods have experienced rapid growth in higher education due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study aimed to compare students' academic performance between online and blended Clinical Skill Laboratories (CSL) learning in undergraduate medical students.
Methods: A total of 101 undergraduate medical students at Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University, Malang, Indonesia, were enrolled (50 students from the academic year 2020 [group 1: online CSL]; 51 students from the academic year 2020 [group 2: blended CSL]). The main outcome was students' academic performance collected from the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) score. Additionally, students also completed an evaluation questionnaire to assess the quality of the learning scheme.
Results: Both groups agreed that CSL is an important subject and clinical video demonstration is useful for their OSCE preparation. However, students who received online learning felt that online CSL was ineffective and scored lower in the OSCE compared to the blended CSL. Qualitative data also supported these findings.
Conclusion: Blended learning provides more value than online learning in terms of teaching clinical skills for undergraduate medical students. Additionally, online CSL may not be sufficient for medical students to attain critical skills.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
