自我效能感量表的发展在咨询中对宽恕起作用

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.21449/ijate.1263121
Meryem VURAL BATIK, Selda ÖRS ÖZDİL, Necla AFYONKALE TALAY
{"title":"自我效能感量表的发展在咨询中对宽恕起作用","authors":"Meryem VURAL BATIK, Selda ÖRS ÖZDİL, Necla AFYONKALE TALAY","doi":"10.21449/ijate.1263121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is said that working on forgiveness in psychological counseling will significantly benefit the individual, taking into account the good consequences of forgiving on the individual. This study aimed to develop a measurement tool for determining self-efficacy to work on forgiveness in counseling (SSWOFIC). The most commonly regarded forgiveness process model, Enright's Forgiveness Process Model, served as the foundation for the creation of this measurement tool. 285 counselors provided information for the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and 258 counselors provided information for the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). For the content validity of the scale, eight specialists were contacted. EFA revealed a single factor structure with 41 items that accounted for 61.7% of the overall variation. It was found that all of the SSWOFIC's items were discriminative and had a high level of factor loading value in the pertinent factor. To ascertain if the structure identified by EFA was confirmed or not, CFA was carried out. The one-factor structure was confirmed, as evidenced by the resulting model's fit indices. The computed Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega reliability coefficients were 0.99, and the Split-Half method's results for the Guttman and Spearman-Brown coefficients were 0.96. The SSWOFIC results demonstrated the validity and reliability of the scale, which consists of a single component and 41 items. The established scale will make it possible to conduct studies to ascertain the level of self-efficacy of psychological counselors with regard to this matter and to examine this feature in terms of other variables.","PeriodicalId":42417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development of a scale of self-efficacy to work on forgiveness in counseling\",\"authors\":\"Meryem VURAL BATIK, Selda ÖRS ÖZDİL, Necla AFYONKALE TALAY\",\"doi\":\"10.21449/ijate.1263121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is said that working on forgiveness in psychological counseling will significantly benefit the individual, taking into account the good consequences of forgiving on the individual. This study aimed to develop a measurement tool for determining self-efficacy to work on forgiveness in counseling (SSWOFIC). The most commonly regarded forgiveness process model, Enright's Forgiveness Process Model, served as the foundation for the creation of this measurement tool. 285 counselors provided information for the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and 258 counselors provided information for the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). For the content validity of the scale, eight specialists were contacted. EFA revealed a single factor structure with 41 items that accounted for 61.7% of the overall variation. It was found that all of the SSWOFIC's items were discriminative and had a high level of factor loading value in the pertinent factor. To ascertain if the structure identified by EFA was confirmed or not, CFA was carried out. The one-factor structure was confirmed, as evidenced by the resulting model's fit indices. The computed Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega reliability coefficients were 0.99, and the Split-Half method's results for the Guttman and Spearman-Brown coefficients were 0.96. The SSWOFIC results demonstrated the validity and reliability of the scale, which consists of a single component and 41 items. The established scale will make it possible to conduct studies to ascertain the level of self-efficacy of psychological counselors with regard to this matter and to examine this feature in terms of other variables.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1263121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1263121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据说,考虑到宽恕对个人的良好影响,在心理咨询中致力于宽恕将对个人大有裨益。本研究旨在开发一种测量工具,用于确定咨询中宽恕工作的自我效能感(SSWOFIC)。最常见的宽恕过程模型,Enright的宽恕过程模式,是创建这种测量工具的基础。285名辅导员为探索性因素分析(EFA)提供了信息,258名辅导员为证实性因素分析提供了信息。关于量表的内容有效性,我们联系了八位专家。全民教育呈现单因素结构,共有41个项目,占总变化的61.7%。研究发现,SSWOFIC的所有项目都具有鉴别性,并且在相关因素中具有较高水平的因素负荷值。为了确定全民教育确定的结构是否得到确认,进行了CFA。得到的模型拟合指数证明了单因素结构。计算出的Cronbach’s Alpha和McDonald’s Omega可靠性系数为0.99,Guttman和Spearman-Brown系数的分半法结果为0.96。SSWOFIC结果证明了该量表的有效性和可靠性,该量表由一个单独的组成部分和41个项目组成。建立的量表将有可能进行研究,以确定心理咨询师在这方面的自我效能水平,并从其他变量的角度来检验这一特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The development of a scale of self-efficacy to work on forgiveness in counseling
It is said that working on forgiveness in psychological counseling will significantly benefit the individual, taking into account the good consequences of forgiving on the individual. This study aimed to develop a measurement tool for determining self-efficacy to work on forgiveness in counseling (SSWOFIC). The most commonly regarded forgiveness process model, Enright's Forgiveness Process Model, served as the foundation for the creation of this measurement tool. 285 counselors provided information for the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and 258 counselors provided information for the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). For the content validity of the scale, eight specialists were contacted. EFA revealed a single factor structure with 41 items that accounted for 61.7% of the overall variation. It was found that all of the SSWOFIC's items were discriminative and had a high level of factor loading value in the pertinent factor. To ascertain if the structure identified by EFA was confirmed or not, CFA was carried out. The one-factor structure was confirmed, as evidenced by the resulting model's fit indices. The computed Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega reliability coefficients were 0.99, and the Split-Half method's results for the Guttman and Spearman-Brown coefficients were 0.96. The SSWOFIC results demonstrated the validity and reliability of the scale, which consists of a single component and 41 items. The established scale will make it possible to conduct studies to ascertain the level of self-efficacy of psychological counselors with regard to this matter and to examine this feature in terms of other variables.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The difference between estimated and perceived item difficulty: An empirical study Current Effect of Mother-Child Memory Talk on Emotion Regulation, Self-Esteem, and Memory Anxiety scale for parents of gifted children (ASPGC): Validity and reliability study Examining the validity and reliability of the academic entitlement scale in Turkish culture The examination of mediating role of distributed leadership in the relationship between school structure and accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1