瑞典2017-18联合国安理会公式:调动MFA的竞争优势,突出非洲,推动E10

IF 1.5 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1080/13533312.2023.2196019
K. Engelbrekt
{"title":"瑞典2017-18联合国安理会公式:调动MFA的竞争优势,突出非洲,推动E10","authors":"K. Engelbrekt","doi":"10.1080/13533312.2023.2196019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines Sweden’s successful 2016 bid to serve at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and shows that the subsequent 2017–18 tenure relied on a formula with three key elements. One was to mobilize the competitive advantages of its Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), and a second to systematically highlight Africa-related priorities. A third element was to boost the standing of the E10 category of members in day-to-day diplomatic practice. After securing a plurality of votes in the General Assembly, Swedish diplomats went to work with a unique constellation of concurrently serving likeminded countries, generally receptive to Stockholm’s priorities. The formula appears to have contributed to a solid performance in 2017–2018. That said, the UNSC is not conducive to individual E10 members having a lasting impact on its institutional memory.","PeriodicalId":47231,"journal":{"name":"International Peacekeeping","volume":"30 1","pages":"358 - 379"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sweden’s 2017–18 UNSC Formula: Mobilizing the MFA’s Competitive Advantages, Highlighting Africa, and Boosting the E10\",\"authors\":\"K. Engelbrekt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13533312.2023.2196019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article examines Sweden’s successful 2016 bid to serve at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and shows that the subsequent 2017–18 tenure relied on a formula with three key elements. One was to mobilize the competitive advantages of its Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), and a second to systematically highlight Africa-related priorities. A third element was to boost the standing of the E10 category of members in day-to-day diplomatic practice. After securing a plurality of votes in the General Assembly, Swedish diplomats went to work with a unique constellation of concurrently serving likeminded countries, generally receptive to Stockholm’s priorities. The formula appears to have contributed to a solid performance in 2017–2018. That said, the UNSC is not conducive to individual E10 members having a lasting impact on its institutional memory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Peacekeeping\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"358 - 379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Peacekeeping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2023.2196019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Peacekeeping","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2023.2196019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文考察了瑞典2016年成功申办联合国安理会(UNSC)的情况,并表明随后的2017-18年任期依赖于一个包含三个关键要素的公式。一个是调动外交部的竞争优势,另一个是系统地强调与非洲有关的优先事项。第三个要素是提高E10类别成员在日常外交实践中的地位。在联合国大会上获得多数票后,瑞典外交官开始与一群独特的同时服务的志同道合的国家合作,这些国家普遍接受斯德哥尔摩的优先事项。该公式似乎为2017-2018年的稳健表现做出了贡献。也就是说,联合国安理会不利于E10成员国对其机构记忆产生持久影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sweden’s 2017–18 UNSC Formula: Mobilizing the MFA’s Competitive Advantages, Highlighting Africa, and Boosting the E10
ABSTRACT This article examines Sweden’s successful 2016 bid to serve at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and shows that the subsequent 2017–18 tenure relied on a formula with three key elements. One was to mobilize the competitive advantages of its Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), and a second to systematically highlight Africa-related priorities. A third element was to boost the standing of the E10 category of members in day-to-day diplomatic practice. After securing a plurality of votes in the General Assembly, Swedish diplomats went to work with a unique constellation of concurrently serving likeminded countries, generally receptive to Stockholm’s priorities. The formula appears to have contributed to a solid performance in 2017–2018. That said, the UNSC is not conducive to individual E10 members having a lasting impact on its institutional memory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Peacekeeping
International Peacekeeping INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.40%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Illiberal Peacebuilding in UN Stabilization Peace Operations and Peace Agreements in the CAR, the DRC and Mali Estimating the Cost of Positive Peace Entangled Peace: UN Peacebuilding and the Limits of a Relational WorldEntangled Peace: UN Peacebuilding and the Limits of a Relational World, by Ignasi Torrent, Rowman & Littlefield, 2021, 144 pp., £73.00(hardback) and £30.00(paperback), ISBN 9781538150764 Mass Atrocities, Peace Operations, and the UNSC: How Responsive is the UN Security Council to Atrocity Events through Peacekeeping Mandates? When Peace Kills Politics: International Intervention and Unending Wars in the Sudans When Peace Kills Politics: International Intervention and Unending Wars in the Sudans , by Sharath Srinivasan, London, Hurst, 2021, 400 pp., £25 (paperback), ISBN 9781849048316
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1