离散选择分析的选择匹配方法:实验室的实验研究

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Land Economics Pub Date : 2022-04-21 DOI:10.3368/le.012621-0009r1
Simone Cerroni, Dan Derbyshire, W. Hutchinson, R. Nayga
{"title":"离散选择分析的选择匹配方法:实验室的实验研究","authors":"Simone Cerroni, Dan Derbyshire, W. Hutchinson, R. Nayga","doi":"10.3368/le.012621-0009r1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is the first empirical application of the choice matching (CMa) method in discrete choice experiments (DCEs). An artifactual field experiment was conducted to test whether CMa applied to a DCE survey improves the validity and reliability of estimated preferences regarding standard hypothetical DCEs. Two experimental treatments were developed. In the first, subjects were exposed to a CMa-based DCE; in the second, subjects were exposed to a standard hypothetical DCE survey. Results suggest that although a CMa-based DCE does not improve validity, it can increase the reliability of estimated preferences.","PeriodicalId":51378,"journal":{"name":"Land Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Choice Matching Approach for Discrete Choice Analysis: An Experimental Investigation in the Laboratory\",\"authors\":\"Simone Cerroni, Dan Derbyshire, W. Hutchinson, R. Nayga\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/le.012621-0009r1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is the first empirical application of the choice matching (CMa) method in discrete choice experiments (DCEs). An artifactual field experiment was conducted to test whether CMa applied to a DCE survey improves the validity and reliability of estimated preferences regarding standard hypothetical DCEs. Two experimental treatments were developed. In the first, subjects were exposed to a CMa-based DCE; in the second, subjects were exposed to a standard hypothetical DCE survey. Results suggest that although a CMa-based DCE does not improve validity, it can increase the reliability of estimated preferences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/le.012621-0009r1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/le.012621-0009r1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文是选择匹配方法在离散选择实验中的首次实证应用。进行了一项人工现场实验,以测试将CMa应用于DCE调查是否能提高关于标准假设DCE的估计偏好的有效性和可靠性。开发了两种实验处理方法。在第一个实验中,受试者暴露于基于CMa的DCE;在第二项研究中,受试者接受了一项标准的假设DCE调查。结果表明,尽管基于CMa的DCE不能提高有效性,但它可以提高估计偏好的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Choice Matching Approach for Discrete Choice Analysis: An Experimental Investigation in the Laboratory
This article is the first empirical application of the choice matching (CMa) method in discrete choice experiments (DCEs). An artifactual field experiment was conducted to test whether CMa applied to a DCE survey improves the validity and reliability of estimated preferences regarding standard hypothetical DCEs. Two experimental treatments were developed. In the first, subjects were exposed to a CMa-based DCE; in the second, subjects were exposed to a standard hypothetical DCE survey. Results suggest that although a CMa-based DCE does not improve validity, it can increase the reliability of estimated preferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Land Economics
Land Economics Multiple-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Land Economics is dedicated to the study of land use, natural resources, public utilities, housing, and urban land issues. Established in 1925 by the renowned economist and founder of the American Economic Association, Richard T. Ely at the University of Wisconsin, Land Economics has consistently published innovative, conceptual, and empirical research of direct relevance to economists. Each issue brings the latest results in international applied research on such topics as transportation, energy, urban and rural land use, housing, environmental quality, public utilities, and natural resources.
期刊最新文献
Does Peer Adoption Increase the Diffusion of Pollution Prevention Practices? The Impact of Weather Risk on Tenure Security Race and Concern for the Environment The Demand for Voluntary Carbon Dioxide Removal Housing Market Capitalization of Pipeline Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1