病灶内注射溶组织梭菌是否影响佩罗尼病的治疗实践?

I. Gruenwald
{"title":"病灶内注射溶组织梭菌是否影响佩罗尼病的治疗实践?","authors":"I. Gruenwald","doi":"10.33552/aun.2021.02.000544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Penile curvature and pain during erection present a significant bothersome issue for men with Peyronie’s disease and their partners. Clostridium histolyticum was approved for intralesional-injection in patients with Peyronie’s disease and penile curvature. Aim: We aimed primarily to determine whether the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum affects the treatment pattern of Peyronie’s disease at a single academic medical center. Material and methods: Medical records of patients evaluated for penile curvature related to Peyronie’s disease were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were allocated into two groups: those who received consultation prior to intralesional-injection availability, and those who received consultation after intralesional-injection availability. Treatment choices were summarized as percentages of each group. Comparison between the groups regarding the proportion of patients who chose to undergo specific treatment was performed using a Chi-square test. Results: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients were evaluated. Fifty-nine were evaluated before the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group A) while 168 patients were evaluated post-introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group B). After the first discussion on management, 32 (54.2%) group A and 105 (62.5%) group B patients decided not to pursue treatment nor follow-up. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing any treatment was observed between the groups (p>0.05). Of the remaining 27 patients in group A, 10 patients (37.0%) underwent surgery. Of the 63 remaining patients in group B, 14 (22.2%) underwent surgery. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing surgery was observed between the 2 groups. Of the remaining patients in group B, only 12 (19.0%) were treated with intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum, and the rest, thirty-seven (59%) patients, elected to continue follow-up without treatment. Conclusion: The addition of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum to Peyronie’s disease treatment arsenal did not significantly alter the percentage of patients choosing to undergo surgery.","PeriodicalId":93263,"journal":{"name":"Annals of urology & nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Intralesional Injection of Clostridium Histolyticum affect the Treatment Practice of Peyronie’s Disease?\",\"authors\":\"I. Gruenwald\",\"doi\":\"10.33552/aun.2021.02.000544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Penile curvature and pain during erection present a significant bothersome issue for men with Peyronie’s disease and their partners. Clostridium histolyticum was approved for intralesional-injection in patients with Peyronie’s disease and penile curvature. Aim: We aimed primarily to determine whether the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum affects the treatment pattern of Peyronie’s disease at a single academic medical center. Material and methods: Medical records of patients evaluated for penile curvature related to Peyronie’s disease were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were allocated into two groups: those who received consultation prior to intralesional-injection availability, and those who received consultation after intralesional-injection availability. Treatment choices were summarized as percentages of each group. Comparison between the groups regarding the proportion of patients who chose to undergo specific treatment was performed using a Chi-square test. Results: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients were evaluated. Fifty-nine were evaluated before the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group A) while 168 patients were evaluated post-introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group B). After the first discussion on management, 32 (54.2%) group A and 105 (62.5%) group B patients decided not to pursue treatment nor follow-up. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing any treatment was observed between the groups (p>0.05). Of the remaining 27 patients in group A, 10 patients (37.0%) underwent surgery. Of the 63 remaining patients in group B, 14 (22.2%) underwent surgery. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing surgery was observed between the 2 groups. Of the remaining patients in group B, only 12 (19.0%) were treated with intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum, and the rest, thirty-seven (59%) patients, elected to continue follow-up without treatment. Conclusion: The addition of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum to Peyronie’s disease treatment arsenal did not significantly alter the percentage of patients choosing to undergo surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of urology & nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of urology & nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33552/aun.2021.02.000544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of urology & nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/aun.2021.02.000544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:阴茎弯曲和勃起过程中的疼痛对患有佩罗尼氏症的男性及其伴侣来说是一个非常麻烦的问题。溶组织梭菌被批准用于佩罗尼病和阴茎弯曲患者的病变内注射。目的:我们的主要目的是确定在单个学术医疗中心引入溶组织梭菌的病灶内注射是否会影响Peyronie病的治疗模式。材料和方法:回顾性分析与Peyronie病相关的阴茎弯曲评估患者的医疗记录。患者被分为两组:在病灶内注射可用性之前接受咨询的患者和在病灶内注入可用性之后接受咨询的人群。治疗选择总结为各组的百分比。使用卡方检验对两组选择接受特定治疗的患者比例进行比较。结果:对227例患者进行了评估。59例患者在引入溶组织梭菌病灶内注射前进行评估(A组),168例患者在引进溶组织梭菌病变内注射后进行评估(B组)。在第一次讨论管理后,32名(54.2%)A组和105名(62.5%)B组患者决定不进行治疗或随访。两组接受任何治疗的患者百分比没有统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)。在A组其余27名患者中,10名患者(37.0%)接受了手术。在B组剩下的63名患者中,14名(22.2%)接受了手术。两组患者接受手术的百分比没有统计学上的显著差异。在B组的其余患者中,只有12名(19.0%)接受了病灶内注射溶组织梭菌的治疗,其余37名(59%)患者选择继续随访而不接受治疗。结论:在Peyronie疾病治疗库中加入溶组织梭菌病灶内注射并没有显著改变选择接受手术的患者比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Intralesional Injection of Clostridium Histolyticum affect the Treatment Practice of Peyronie’s Disease?
Introduction: Penile curvature and pain during erection present a significant bothersome issue for men with Peyronie’s disease and their partners. Clostridium histolyticum was approved for intralesional-injection in patients with Peyronie’s disease and penile curvature. Aim: We aimed primarily to determine whether the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum affects the treatment pattern of Peyronie’s disease at a single academic medical center. Material and methods: Medical records of patients evaluated for penile curvature related to Peyronie’s disease were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were allocated into two groups: those who received consultation prior to intralesional-injection availability, and those who received consultation after intralesional-injection availability. Treatment choices were summarized as percentages of each group. Comparison between the groups regarding the proportion of patients who chose to undergo specific treatment was performed using a Chi-square test. Results: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients were evaluated. Fifty-nine were evaluated before the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group A) while 168 patients were evaluated post-introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group B). After the first discussion on management, 32 (54.2%) group A and 105 (62.5%) group B patients decided not to pursue treatment nor follow-up. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing any treatment was observed between the groups (p>0.05). Of the remaining 27 patients in group A, 10 patients (37.0%) underwent surgery. Of the 63 remaining patients in group B, 14 (22.2%) underwent surgery. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing surgery was observed between the 2 groups. Of the remaining patients in group B, only 12 (19.0%) were treated with intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum, and the rest, thirty-seven (59%) patients, elected to continue follow-up without treatment. Conclusion: The addition of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum to Peyronie’s disease treatment arsenal did not significantly alter the percentage of patients choosing to undergo surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association Between Blood Flow Rate of Arteriovenous Access and Mortality in Prevalent Haemodialysis Patients: A Five-Year Prospective Study A Case of Severe Acute Hyperphosphatemia Secondary to Ingestion of Phosphoric Acid Solution Treated with Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Considerations in the Management of Covid-19 in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease NSAIDs, Dehydration and Acute Kidney Failure in the Young Adults: An Unrecognized Entity? Traumatic Urethrovaginal Fistula from Female Genital Mutilation Presenting as Bladder Outlet Obstruction: A Rare Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1