{"title":"病灶内注射溶组织梭菌是否影响佩罗尼病的治疗实践?","authors":"I. Gruenwald","doi":"10.33552/aun.2021.02.000544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Penile curvature and pain during erection present a significant bothersome issue for men with Peyronie’s disease and their partners. Clostridium histolyticum was approved for intralesional-injection in patients with Peyronie’s disease and penile curvature. Aim: We aimed primarily to determine whether the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum affects the treatment pattern of Peyronie’s disease at a single academic medical center. Material and methods: Medical records of patients evaluated for penile curvature related to Peyronie’s disease were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were allocated into two groups: those who received consultation prior to intralesional-injection availability, and those who received consultation after intralesional-injection availability. Treatment choices were summarized as percentages of each group. Comparison between the groups regarding the proportion of patients who chose to undergo specific treatment was performed using a Chi-square test. Results: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients were evaluated. Fifty-nine were evaluated before the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group A) while 168 patients were evaluated post-introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group B). After the first discussion on management, 32 (54.2%) group A and 105 (62.5%) group B patients decided not to pursue treatment nor follow-up. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing any treatment was observed between the groups (p>0.05). Of the remaining 27 patients in group A, 10 patients (37.0%) underwent surgery. Of the 63 remaining patients in group B, 14 (22.2%) underwent surgery. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing surgery was observed between the 2 groups. Of the remaining patients in group B, only 12 (19.0%) were treated with intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum, and the rest, thirty-seven (59%) patients, elected to continue follow-up without treatment. Conclusion: The addition of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum to Peyronie’s disease treatment arsenal did not significantly alter the percentage of patients choosing to undergo surgery.","PeriodicalId":93263,"journal":{"name":"Annals of urology & nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Intralesional Injection of Clostridium Histolyticum affect the Treatment Practice of Peyronie’s Disease?\",\"authors\":\"I. Gruenwald\",\"doi\":\"10.33552/aun.2021.02.000544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Penile curvature and pain during erection present a significant bothersome issue for men with Peyronie’s disease and their partners. Clostridium histolyticum was approved for intralesional-injection in patients with Peyronie’s disease and penile curvature. Aim: We aimed primarily to determine whether the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum affects the treatment pattern of Peyronie’s disease at a single academic medical center. Material and methods: Medical records of patients evaluated for penile curvature related to Peyronie’s disease were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were allocated into two groups: those who received consultation prior to intralesional-injection availability, and those who received consultation after intralesional-injection availability. Treatment choices were summarized as percentages of each group. Comparison between the groups regarding the proportion of patients who chose to undergo specific treatment was performed using a Chi-square test. Results: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients were evaluated. Fifty-nine were evaluated before the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group A) while 168 patients were evaluated post-introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group B). After the first discussion on management, 32 (54.2%) group A and 105 (62.5%) group B patients decided not to pursue treatment nor follow-up. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing any treatment was observed between the groups (p>0.05). Of the remaining 27 patients in group A, 10 patients (37.0%) underwent surgery. Of the 63 remaining patients in group B, 14 (22.2%) underwent surgery. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing surgery was observed between the 2 groups. Of the remaining patients in group B, only 12 (19.0%) were treated with intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum, and the rest, thirty-seven (59%) patients, elected to continue follow-up without treatment. Conclusion: The addition of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum to Peyronie’s disease treatment arsenal did not significantly alter the percentage of patients choosing to undergo surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of urology & nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of urology & nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33552/aun.2021.02.000544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of urology & nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/aun.2021.02.000544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does Intralesional Injection of Clostridium Histolyticum affect the Treatment Practice of Peyronie’s Disease?
Introduction: Penile curvature and pain during erection present a significant bothersome issue for men with Peyronie’s disease and their partners. Clostridium histolyticum was approved for intralesional-injection in patients with Peyronie’s disease and penile curvature. Aim: We aimed primarily to determine whether the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum affects the treatment pattern of Peyronie’s disease at a single academic medical center. Material and methods: Medical records of patients evaluated for penile curvature related to Peyronie’s disease were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were allocated into two groups: those who received consultation prior to intralesional-injection availability, and those who received consultation after intralesional-injection availability. Treatment choices were summarized as percentages of each group. Comparison between the groups regarding the proportion of patients who chose to undergo specific treatment was performed using a Chi-square test. Results: Two hundred and twenty-seven patients were evaluated. Fifty-nine were evaluated before the introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group A) while 168 patients were evaluated post-introduction of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum (group B). After the first discussion on management, 32 (54.2%) group A and 105 (62.5%) group B patients decided not to pursue treatment nor follow-up. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing any treatment was observed between the groups (p>0.05). Of the remaining 27 patients in group A, 10 patients (37.0%) underwent surgery. Of the 63 remaining patients in group B, 14 (22.2%) underwent surgery. No statistically significant difference in percentage of patients undergoing surgery was observed between the 2 groups. Of the remaining patients in group B, only 12 (19.0%) were treated with intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum, and the rest, thirty-seven (59%) patients, elected to continue follow-up without treatment. Conclusion: The addition of intralesional-injection of clostridium histolyticum to Peyronie’s disease treatment arsenal did not significantly alter the percentage of patients choosing to undergo surgery.