YouTube上的尿道下裂手术:有效吗?

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Minerva pediatrica Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4946.19.05555-5
E. Karabay, N. Karşıyakalı, Kemal Kayar, Hikmet Koseoglu
{"title":"YouTube上的尿道下裂手术:有效吗?","authors":"E. Karabay, N. Karşıyakalı, Kemal Kayar, Hikmet Koseoglu","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4946.19.05555-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThis study aims to evaluate video clips of hypospadias surgery on YouTube and to assess their competence for basic steps of hypospadias surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe YouTube (http://www.youtube.com) was screened for videos of hypospadias surgery between 1 December 2018 and 20 December 2018. Videos were divided into three groups based on the subjective utility checklist scores as follows: highly compatible (Group 1; ≥7 points), moderately compatible (Group 2; 5-6 points), and less compatible (Group 3; ≤4 points). Groups were compared statistically.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 100 videos were included in this study. The mean total score was 4.48 ± 1.97. There were 15 (15%) videos in Group 1, 42 (42%) in Group 2, and 43 (43%) in Group 3. There was a statistically significant difference in the total score, duration of videos, and like/dislike ratios among the groups (p<0.001, for all). There was a strong and significant correlation between the total scores and the step of glanuloplasty and skin closure (r: 0.805, p<0.001 and r: 0.770, p<0.001, respectively).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur study results suggest that the educational content of the videos of hypospadias surgery on YouTube is unsatisfactory. We believe that such videos must contain information regarding the surgical steps of glanuloplasty, skin closure, flap transposition, and urethroplasty and detailed information about the suture materials.","PeriodicalId":18533,"journal":{"name":"Minerva pediatrica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypospadias surgery on YouTube: is it valid?\",\"authors\":\"E. Karabay, N. Karşıyakalı, Kemal Kayar, Hikmet Koseoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4946.19.05555-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nThis study aims to evaluate video clips of hypospadias surgery on YouTube and to assess their competence for basic steps of hypospadias surgery.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThe YouTube (http://www.youtube.com) was screened for videos of hypospadias surgery between 1 December 2018 and 20 December 2018. Videos were divided into three groups based on the subjective utility checklist scores as follows: highly compatible (Group 1; ≥7 points), moderately compatible (Group 2; 5-6 points), and less compatible (Group 3; ≤4 points). Groups were compared statistically.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nA total of 100 videos were included in this study. The mean total score was 4.48 ± 1.97. There were 15 (15%) videos in Group 1, 42 (42%) in Group 2, and 43 (43%) in Group 3. There was a statistically significant difference in the total score, duration of videos, and like/dislike ratios among the groups (p<0.001, for all). There was a strong and significant correlation between the total scores and the step of glanuloplasty and skin closure (r: 0.805, p<0.001 and r: 0.770, p<0.001, respectively).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nOur study results suggest that the educational content of the videos of hypospadias surgery on YouTube is unsatisfactory. We believe that such videos must contain information regarding the surgical steps of glanuloplasty, skin closure, flap transposition, and urethroplasty and detailed information about the suture materials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva pediatrica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva pediatrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4946.19.05555-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva pediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4946.19.05555-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景本研究旨在评估YouTube上尿道下裂手术的视频片段,并评估他们对尿道下裂外科基本步骤的能力。方法YouTube(http://www.youtube.com)在2018年12月1日至2018年12日20日期间,播放了尿道下裂手术的视频。根据主观效用清单得分,视频分为三组:高度兼容(第1组;≥7分)、中度兼容(第2组;5-6分)和不太兼容(第3组;≤4分)。对各组进行统计学比较。结果本研究共纳入100个视频。平均总分为4.48±1.97。第一组有15个(15%)视频,第二组有42个(42%),第三组有43个(43%)。各组在总分、视频持续时间和喜欢/不喜欢比率方面存在统计学显著差异(p均<0.001)。总分与龟头成形术和皮肤闭合的步骤之间存在强烈且显著的相关性(分别为r:0.805,p<0.001和r:0.770,p<0.001)。结论我们的研究结果表明,YouTube上尿道下裂手术视频的教育内容不令人满意。我们认为,此类视频必须包含有关龟头成形术、皮肤闭合术、皮瓣移位术和尿道成形术的手术步骤的信息,以及有关缝合材料的详细信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hypospadias surgery on YouTube: is it valid?
BACKGROUND This study aims to evaluate video clips of hypospadias surgery on YouTube and to assess their competence for basic steps of hypospadias surgery. METHODS The YouTube (http://www.youtube.com) was screened for videos of hypospadias surgery between 1 December 2018 and 20 December 2018. Videos were divided into three groups based on the subjective utility checklist scores as follows: highly compatible (Group 1; ≥7 points), moderately compatible (Group 2; 5-6 points), and less compatible (Group 3; ≤4 points). Groups were compared statistically. RESULTS A total of 100 videos were included in this study. The mean total score was 4.48 ± 1.97. There were 15 (15%) videos in Group 1, 42 (42%) in Group 2, and 43 (43%) in Group 3. There was a statistically significant difference in the total score, duration of videos, and like/dislike ratios among the groups (p<0.001, for all). There was a strong and significant correlation between the total scores and the step of glanuloplasty and skin closure (r: 0.805, p<0.001 and r: 0.770, p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Our study results suggest that the educational content of the videos of hypospadias surgery on YouTube is unsatisfactory. We believe that such videos must contain information regarding the surgical steps of glanuloplasty, skin closure, flap transposition, and urethroplasty and detailed information about the suture materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva pediatrica
Minerva pediatrica PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Pediatrica publishes scientific papers on pediatrics, neonatology, adolescent medicine, child and adolescent psychiatry and pediatric surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study of pediatric nurses' perception of factors affecting negotiation of care in a Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Unit. The use of analgesics in pediatric patients with body injuries in pre-hospital conditions. Respiratory polygraphy in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective study. Evaluation of factors affecting total nucleated cells in umbilical cord blood collected for the Calabria Cord Blood Bank. Risk factors associated with wheezing in severe pediatric community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1