{"title":"数字评定量表在奈里腹腔镜下联合应用勃起阻滞-棘平面与静脉滴注Petidine术中的比较","authors":"Arrys Prabowo, Reza Widianto Sudjud, Ricky Adytia","doi":"10.15851/jap.v9n2.2405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nyeri pascaoperasi harus diatasi dengan baik. Berbagai metode analgetik dilakukan untuk mengatasi nyeri pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik, namun tidak ada yang ideal dalam menangani nyeri pascaoperasi. Blokade erector spinae plane adalah teknik baru untuk penanganan nyeri pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui perbedaan nyeri pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik yang dinilai dengan NRS nyeri antara pasien yang menggunakan blokade erector spinae plane dan petidin intravena. Penelitian dilakukan pada periode Juni–Oktober 2020 di RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode uji klinis acak terkontrol buta tunggal terhadap 30 pasien. Pasien dibagi menjadi dua kelompok, kelompok petidine intravena (kelompok A, n=15) dan kelompok blokade erector spinae plane (kelompok B, n=15). Nyeri pascaoperasi dinilai dengan NRS pada 0–1 jam, 1–6 jam, 6–12 jam, dan 12–24 jam. Analisis data numerik dengan uji T tidak berpasangan dan Mann Whitney. Data kategorik dengan uji chi square . Skor NRS pada kelompok blokade erector spinae plane lebih rendah dibanding dengan kelompok petidin intravena pada 6–12 jam pascaoperasi (p=0,002) dan kebutuhan rescue analgetik pada 6–12 jam lebih rendah pada kelompok blokade. Metode analgetik blokade erector spinae plane pada pasien pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik lebih baik daripada petidin intravena. Comparison of Pain Numeric Rating Scale between Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intravenous Pethidine Post-Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Postoperative pain is a complaint that must be properly managed. Various analgesic methods are implemented to alleviate laparoscopic cholecystectomy postoperative pain, but none are ideal in managing postoperative pain. Erector spinae plane block is a new technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy postoperative pain. This study aims to discover the difference in post laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain measured using the NRS pain scale in patients with erector spinae plane block and intravenous pethidine. The study was conducted between June–October 2020 in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung. This was a single blind control trial in 30 patients. Patients were divided into two groups, an intravenous pethidine group (group A, n=15) and an erector spinae plane block group (group B, n=15). Postoperative pain was measured using the NRS pain scale on hour 0–1, 1–6, 6–12, and 12–24. Numerical data was analyzed using the unpaired T test and the Mann Whitney test. Categorical data using the chi square test. NRS measurements in the erector spinae plane block group were lower compared to the intravenous pethidine group in hour 6–12 postoperation (p=0.002) and the need for a rescue analgesic in hour 6–12 lower in the blokade group. The analgesic method erector spinae plane block in patients post laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better than intravenous pethidine.","PeriodicalId":30635,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perbandingan Numeric Rating Scale Nyeri Pascaoperasi Kolesistektomi Laparoskopik Antara Blokade Erector Spinae Plane dan Petidin Intravena\",\"authors\":\"Arrys Prabowo, Reza Widianto Sudjud, Ricky Adytia\",\"doi\":\"10.15851/jap.v9n2.2405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nyeri pascaoperasi harus diatasi dengan baik. Berbagai metode analgetik dilakukan untuk mengatasi nyeri pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik, namun tidak ada yang ideal dalam menangani nyeri pascaoperasi. Blokade erector spinae plane adalah teknik baru untuk penanganan nyeri pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui perbedaan nyeri pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik yang dinilai dengan NRS nyeri antara pasien yang menggunakan blokade erector spinae plane dan petidin intravena. Penelitian dilakukan pada periode Juni–Oktober 2020 di RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode uji klinis acak terkontrol buta tunggal terhadap 30 pasien. Pasien dibagi menjadi dua kelompok, kelompok petidine intravena (kelompok A, n=15) dan kelompok blokade erector spinae plane (kelompok B, n=15). Nyeri pascaoperasi dinilai dengan NRS pada 0–1 jam, 1–6 jam, 6–12 jam, dan 12–24 jam. Analisis data numerik dengan uji T tidak berpasangan dan Mann Whitney. Data kategorik dengan uji chi square . Skor NRS pada kelompok blokade erector spinae plane lebih rendah dibanding dengan kelompok petidin intravena pada 6–12 jam pascaoperasi (p=0,002) dan kebutuhan rescue analgetik pada 6–12 jam lebih rendah pada kelompok blokade. Metode analgetik blokade erector spinae plane pada pasien pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik lebih baik daripada petidin intravena. Comparison of Pain Numeric Rating Scale between Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intravenous Pethidine Post-Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Postoperative pain is a complaint that must be properly managed. Various analgesic methods are implemented to alleviate laparoscopic cholecystectomy postoperative pain, but none are ideal in managing postoperative pain. Erector spinae plane block is a new technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy postoperative pain. This study aims to discover the difference in post laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain measured using the NRS pain scale in patients with erector spinae plane block and intravenous pethidine. The study was conducted between June–October 2020 in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung. This was a single blind control trial in 30 patients. Patients were divided into two groups, an intravenous pethidine group (group A, n=15) and an erector spinae plane block group (group B, n=15). Postoperative pain was measured using the NRS pain scale on hour 0–1, 1–6, 6–12, and 12–24. Numerical data was analyzed using the unpaired T test and the Mann Whitney test. Categorical data using the chi square test. NRS measurements in the erector spinae plane block group were lower compared to the intravenous pethidine group in hour 6–12 postoperation (p=0.002) and the need for a rescue analgesic in hour 6–12 lower in the blokade group. The analgesic method erector spinae plane block in patients post laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better than intravenous pethidine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15851/jap.v9n2.2405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15851/jap.v9n2.2405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
术后肾脏需要好好处理。有几种镇痛方法可以用来克服腹腔镜结肠系统手术后的疼痛,但在处理术后疼痛方面没有理想的方法。竖脊肌平面阻断术是腹腔镜结肠收缩术后疼痛管理的一种新技术。本研究旨在通过疼痛NRS评估腹腔镜结肠系统手术后使用竖脊肌平面阻滞和静脉注射哌啶的患者的疼痛差异。这项研究于2020年6月至10月在RSUP Hasan Sadikin Bandung博士处进行。这项研究在30名患者的单一盲人群中进行了随机对照临床试验。患者分为两组,静脉注射哌啶组(A组,n=15)和竖脊肌平面阻断组(B组,n=5)。术后肾脏在0-1小时、1-6小时、6-12小时和12-24小时用NRS进行评估。数值数据分析与无与伦比的T检验和Mann-Whitney。卡方检验的分类数据。术后6-12小时,竖脊肌平面阻滞组的NRS评分低于静脉注射哌啶组(p=0.002),阻滞组6-12小时的镇痛抢救需求较低。腹腔镜结肠收缩术后应用竖脊肌平面阻滞的镇痛方法优于静脉注射哌啶。腹腔镜胆囊切除术后勃起棘平面阻滞与静脉注射哌替啶疼痛数值评定量表的比较术后疼痛是一种必须妥善处理的主诉。腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛方法多种多样,但均不理想。竖脊平面阻滞是腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛的一种新技术。本研究旨在发现使用NRS疼痛量表测量竖脊肌平面阻滞和静脉注射哌替啶患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛的差异。该研究于2020年6月至10月在万隆Hasan Sadikin综合医院进行。这是一项针对30名患者的单盲对照试验。患者分为两组,静脉注射哌替啶组(A组,n=15)和竖脊肌平面阻滞组(B组,n=5)。术后疼痛使用NRS疼痛量表在0–1、1–6、6–12和12–24小时测量。使用非配对T检验和Mann-Whitney检验对数值数据进行分析。使用卡方检验的分类数据。术后6-12小时,竖脊肌平面阻断组的NRS测量值低于静脉注射哌替啶组(p=0.002),阻断组6-12小时对抢救性镇痛药的需求较低。腹腔镜胆囊切除术后应用竖脊肌平面阻滞镇痛效果优于静脉滴注哌替啶。
Perbandingan Numeric Rating Scale Nyeri Pascaoperasi Kolesistektomi Laparoskopik Antara Blokade Erector Spinae Plane dan Petidin Intravena
Nyeri pascaoperasi harus diatasi dengan baik. Berbagai metode analgetik dilakukan untuk mengatasi nyeri pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik, namun tidak ada yang ideal dalam menangani nyeri pascaoperasi. Blokade erector spinae plane adalah teknik baru untuk penanganan nyeri pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui perbedaan nyeri pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik yang dinilai dengan NRS nyeri antara pasien yang menggunakan blokade erector spinae plane dan petidin intravena. Penelitian dilakukan pada periode Juni–Oktober 2020 di RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode uji klinis acak terkontrol buta tunggal terhadap 30 pasien. Pasien dibagi menjadi dua kelompok, kelompok petidine intravena (kelompok A, n=15) dan kelompok blokade erector spinae plane (kelompok B, n=15). Nyeri pascaoperasi dinilai dengan NRS pada 0–1 jam, 1–6 jam, 6–12 jam, dan 12–24 jam. Analisis data numerik dengan uji T tidak berpasangan dan Mann Whitney. Data kategorik dengan uji chi square . Skor NRS pada kelompok blokade erector spinae plane lebih rendah dibanding dengan kelompok petidin intravena pada 6–12 jam pascaoperasi (p=0,002) dan kebutuhan rescue analgetik pada 6–12 jam lebih rendah pada kelompok blokade. Metode analgetik blokade erector spinae plane pada pasien pascaoperasi kolesistektomi laparoskopik lebih baik daripada petidin intravena. Comparison of Pain Numeric Rating Scale between Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intravenous Pethidine Post-Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Postoperative pain is a complaint that must be properly managed. Various analgesic methods are implemented to alleviate laparoscopic cholecystectomy postoperative pain, but none are ideal in managing postoperative pain. Erector spinae plane block is a new technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy postoperative pain. This study aims to discover the difference in post laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain measured using the NRS pain scale in patients with erector spinae plane block and intravenous pethidine. The study was conducted between June–October 2020 in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung. This was a single blind control trial in 30 patients. Patients were divided into two groups, an intravenous pethidine group (group A, n=15) and an erector spinae plane block group (group B, n=15). Postoperative pain was measured using the NRS pain scale on hour 0–1, 1–6, 6–12, and 12–24. Numerical data was analyzed using the unpaired T test and the Mann Whitney test. Categorical data using the chi square test. NRS measurements in the erector spinae plane block group were lower compared to the intravenous pethidine group in hour 6–12 postoperation (p=0.002) and the need for a rescue analgesic in hour 6–12 lower in the blokade group. The analgesic method erector spinae plane block in patients post laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better than intravenous pethidine.