需要的集体建构:基督教社会服务机构决定应得性的群体风格

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-09-14 DOI:10.1080/00380253.2020.1788468
Daniel Bolger
{"title":"需要的集体建构:基督教社会服务机构决定应得性的群体风格","authors":"Daniel Bolger","doi":"10.1080/00380253.2020.1788468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research finds that faith-based organizations (FBOs) serve highly disadvantaged populations, but few studies explore how such organizations decide who is deserving of assistance. Drawing on 12 months of observation and 24 interviews at two FBOs in neighborhoods with different poverty rates, I find that agency members circumscribe conceptions of who “needs” assistance based on stories of people who take advantage of services. These stories undergird group styles of service provision that differ in their emphasis on leniency or stringency but share the goal of deterring less-than-needy clients. The group styles demonstrate how informal practices shape resource distribution within FBOs.","PeriodicalId":48007,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Quarterly","volume":"63 1","pages":"74 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00380253.2020.1788468","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Collective Construction of Need: Group Styles of Determining Deservingness in Christian Social Service Agencies\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Bolger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00380253.2020.1788468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Research finds that faith-based organizations (FBOs) serve highly disadvantaged populations, but few studies explore how such organizations decide who is deserving of assistance. Drawing on 12 months of observation and 24 interviews at two FBOs in neighborhoods with different poverty rates, I find that agency members circumscribe conceptions of who “needs” assistance based on stories of people who take advantage of services. These stories undergird group styles of service provision that differ in their emphasis on leniency or stringency but share the goal of deterring less-than-needy clients. The group styles demonstrate how informal practices shape resource distribution within FBOs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"74 - 93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00380253.2020.1788468\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2020.1788468\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2020.1788468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

研究发现,基于信仰的组织(FBOs)服务于高度弱势群体,但很少有研究探讨这些组织如何决定谁应该得到帮助。通过12个月的观察和在贫困率不同的社区对两家fbo的24次采访,我发现机构成员根据利用服务的人的故事来界定谁“需要”援助的概念。这些故事巩固了团体提供服务的风格,这些风格在强调宽大或严格方面有所不同,但都有一个共同的目标,即阻止不那么需要的客户。小组风格展示了非正式实践如何塑造fbo内部的资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Collective Construction of Need: Group Styles of Determining Deservingness in Christian Social Service Agencies
ABSTRACT Research finds that faith-based organizations (FBOs) serve highly disadvantaged populations, but few studies explore how such organizations decide who is deserving of assistance. Drawing on 12 months of observation and 24 interviews at two FBOs in neighborhoods with different poverty rates, I find that agency members circumscribe conceptions of who “needs” assistance based on stories of people who take advantage of services. These stories undergird group styles of service provision that differ in their emphasis on leniency or stringency but share the goal of deterring less-than-needy clients. The group styles demonstrate how informal practices shape resource distribution within FBOs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Sociological Quarterly is devoted to publishing cutting-edge research and theory in all areas of sociological inquiry. Our focus is on publishing the best in empirical research and sociological theory. We look for articles that advance the discipline and reach the widest possible audience. Since 1960, the contributors and readers of The Sociological Quarterly have made it one of the leading generalist journals in the field. Each issue is designed for efficient browsing and reading and the articles are helpful for teaching and classroom use.
期刊最新文献
Unconventional Work, Conventional Problems: Gig Microtask Work, Inequality, and the Flexibility Mystique Mooring Christian Nationalism: How Religious Institutions, Participation, and Beliefs Inform Christian Nationalism Labor Market Inequality, Debt, and the Consequences of Sub-Baccalaureate Higher Education How Local Perceptions Contribute to Urban Environmental Activism: Evidence from the Chicago Metropolitan Area Sad Puppies and SJWs: Symbolic Revolution and Challenges to Field Orthodoxy in the Struggle for Control of Science Fiction’s Hugo Awards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1