新冠肺炎大流行期间关闭巴西-委内瑞拉边境:2020年3月第120号法令的国际法分析

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Direito e Praxis Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1590/2179-8966/2021/62332i
Luiz Sales do Nascimento, Rosilandy Carina Candido Lapa, Victor Augusto Mendes, Vanessa Vasques Assis dos Reis
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间关闭巴西-委内瑞拉边境:2020年3月第120号法令的国际法分析","authors":"Luiz Sales do Nascimento, Rosilandy Carina Candido Lapa, Victor Augusto Mendes, Vanessa Vasques Assis dos Reis","doi":"10.1590/2179-8966/2021/62332i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigates how Regulatory Ordinance No. 120 of March 17, 2020, reflects the constitutional principles and international treaties recognized by Brazil. This Ordinance is a non-statutory regulation to fight COVID-19 seeking to prohibit the entry of people from Venezuela during this pandemic. This deductive investigation assumes that this measure is not supported by the national and international migration laws incorporated by Brazil. The legal justifications the act used as arguments were found to be inconsistent with the formal requirements for the act itself as per the Brazilian legal framework. Verification of its legal and technical justifications showed a lack of legal, scientific, and empirical support, turning the Ordinance into a target of criticism by Civil Society organizations. In light of national and international law, the analysed instrument can be considered in breach of international technical guidelines for administering vulnerable migrant influxes as is the case of Venezuelans in Brazil.","PeriodicalId":54059,"journal":{"name":"Direito e Praxis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The closure of the Brazilian-Venezuelan border during the covid-19 pandemic: international law analysis of ordinance no. 120 of March 2020\",\"authors\":\"Luiz Sales do Nascimento, Rosilandy Carina Candido Lapa, Victor Augusto Mendes, Vanessa Vasques Assis dos Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2179-8966/2021/62332i\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study investigates how Regulatory Ordinance No. 120 of March 17, 2020, reflects the constitutional principles and international treaties recognized by Brazil. This Ordinance is a non-statutory regulation to fight COVID-19 seeking to prohibit the entry of people from Venezuela during this pandemic. This deductive investigation assumes that this measure is not supported by the national and international migration laws incorporated by Brazil. The legal justifications the act used as arguments were found to be inconsistent with the formal requirements for the act itself as per the Brazilian legal framework. Verification of its legal and technical justifications showed a lack of legal, scientific, and empirical support, turning the Ordinance into a target of criticism by Civil Society organizations. In light of national and international law, the analysed instrument can be considered in breach of international technical guidelines for administering vulnerable migrant influxes as is the case of Venezuelans in Brazil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Direito e Praxis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Direito e Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2021/62332i\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Direito e Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2021/62332i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究调查了2020年3月17日第120号监管条例如何反映巴西承认的宪法原则和国际条约。该法令是抗击新冠肺炎的非法定法规,旨在禁止来自委内瑞拉的人员在疫情期间入境。这项演绎调查假设,巴西纳入的国家和国际移民法不支持这一措施。据发现,该法案用作论据的法律依据与巴西法律框架对该法案本身的正式要求不一致。对其法律和技术理由的核查表明,缺乏法律、科学和经验支持,使该条例成为民间社会组织批评的目标。根据国内法和国际法,可以认为所分析的文书违反了管理弱势移民流入的国际技术准则,巴西的委内瑞拉人就是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The closure of the Brazilian-Venezuelan border during the covid-19 pandemic: international law analysis of ordinance no. 120 of March 2020
Abstract This study investigates how Regulatory Ordinance No. 120 of March 17, 2020, reflects the constitutional principles and international treaties recognized by Brazil. This Ordinance is a non-statutory regulation to fight COVID-19 seeking to prohibit the entry of people from Venezuela during this pandemic. This deductive investigation assumes that this measure is not supported by the national and international migration laws incorporated by Brazil. The legal justifications the act used as arguments were found to be inconsistent with the formal requirements for the act itself as per the Brazilian legal framework. Verification of its legal and technical justifications showed a lack of legal, scientific, and empirical support, turning the Ordinance into a target of criticism by Civil Society organizations. In light of national and international law, the analysed instrument can be considered in breach of international technical guidelines for administering vulnerable migrant influxes as is the case of Venezuelans in Brazil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sujeito de direito migrante: igualdade e discriminação A ofensiva neoliberal ao direito da antidiscriminação: a expansão da liberdade protegida no Supremo Tribunal Federal e na Suprema Corte dos EUA Neofascismo, neoliberalismo e direito do trabalho no governo bolsonaro “A Dívida Impagável”: Denise Ferreira da Silva e suas implicações para o Direito, ou reflexões sobre uma obra irresenhável Epistemic indignation and decolonization of the concept of minorities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1