博茨瓦纳基于非定罪的财产没收和没收监管制度分析

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-28 DOI:10.1093/slr/hmab012
G. Mogomotsi
{"title":"博茨瓦纳基于非定罪的财产没收和没收监管制度分析","authors":"G. Mogomotsi","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmab012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Civil (non-conviction based) property forfeiture and confiscation laws are an important aspect of legal regimes for combating organized crime. Although they have recently gained notoriety, property confiscation regimes have been available in some legal system since time immemorial. Botswana has recently enacted the Proceeds and Instruments of Crime Act (PICA) as the main source of law against financial and organized crimes including terrorist financing, money laundering, and racketeering. Furthermore, PICA provides for the regulatory framework relating to both criminal and civil assets confiscation or forfeiture. This article examines the substantive provisions relating to non-conviction-based assets forfeiture in Botswana. It underscores the sanctity of private property rights as the basis of having both substantive and procedural aspects for their deprivation. Furthermore, this article highlights the existence and importance of interim measures available to the state pending the finalization of confiscation proceedings. The prevailing legislative regime attempts to balance the interests of property owners, third parties, and that of the state. This article concludes that the civil forfeiture regime in Botswana reflects the full domestication of international standards.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Analysis of Non-conviction-Based Property Confiscation and Forfeiture Regulatory Regime in Botswana\",\"authors\":\"G. Mogomotsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/slr/hmab012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Civil (non-conviction based) property forfeiture and confiscation laws are an important aspect of legal regimes for combating organized crime. Although they have recently gained notoriety, property confiscation regimes have been available in some legal system since time immemorial. Botswana has recently enacted the Proceeds and Instruments of Crime Act (PICA) as the main source of law against financial and organized crimes including terrorist financing, money laundering, and racketeering. Furthermore, PICA provides for the regulatory framework relating to both criminal and civil assets confiscation or forfeiture. This article examines the substantive provisions relating to non-conviction-based assets forfeiture in Botswana. It underscores the sanctity of private property rights as the basis of having both substantive and procedural aspects for their deprivation. Furthermore, this article highlights the existence and importance of interim measures available to the state pending the finalization of confiscation proceedings. The prevailing legislative regime attempts to balance the interests of property owners, third parties, and that of the state. This article concludes that the civil forfeiture regime in Botswana reflects the full domestication of international standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statute Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statute Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmab012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statute Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmab012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

民事(非定罪)财产没收和充公法是打击有组织犯罪法律制度的一个重要方面。尽管没收财产制度最近声名狼藉,但在某些法律制度中,从远古时代起就存在没收财产制度。博茨瓦纳最近颁布了《犯罪收益和工具法》(PICA),作为打击金融和有组织犯罪(包括恐怖主义融资、洗钱和敲诈勒索)的主要法律来源。此外,《反贪污法》规定了有关刑事和民事资产没收或没收的监管框架。本文审查了博茨瓦纳关于没收非定罪资产的实质性规定。它强调私有财产权的神圣性是剥夺私有财产权的实质性和程序性两个方面的基础。此外,该条强调了在没收程序完成之前,国家可以采取的临时措施的存在和重要性。现行的立法制度试图平衡财产所有者、第三方和国家的利益。本文的结论是,博茨瓦纳的民事没收制度反映了国际标准的充分本土化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Analysis of Non-conviction-Based Property Confiscation and Forfeiture Regulatory Regime in Botswana
Civil (non-conviction based) property forfeiture and confiscation laws are an important aspect of legal regimes for combating organized crime. Although they have recently gained notoriety, property confiscation regimes have been available in some legal system since time immemorial. Botswana has recently enacted the Proceeds and Instruments of Crime Act (PICA) as the main source of law against financial and organized crimes including terrorist financing, money laundering, and racketeering. Furthermore, PICA provides for the regulatory framework relating to both criminal and civil assets confiscation or forfeiture. This article examines the substantive provisions relating to non-conviction-based assets forfeiture in Botswana. It underscores the sanctity of private property rights as the basis of having both substantive and procedural aspects for their deprivation. Furthermore, this article highlights the existence and importance of interim measures available to the state pending the finalization of confiscation proceedings. The prevailing legislative regime attempts to balance the interests of property owners, third parties, and that of the state. This article concludes that the civil forfeiture regime in Botswana reflects the full domestication of international standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The principal objectives of the Review are to provide a vehicle for the consideration of the legislative process, the use of legislation as an instrument of public policy and of the drafting and interpretation of legislation. The Review, which was first established in 1980, is the only journal of its kind within the Commonwealth. It is of particular value to lawyers in both private practice and in public service, and to academics, both lawyers and political scientists, who write and teach within the field of legislation.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Criminal Law Bills: An In-Depth Critical Analysis of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Bill Four Years of Anti-COVID-19 Regulations in Greece: Overview of the Legislative and Regulatory Process and of an Exemplary Administrative Codification Two Uses of Purpose in Statutory Interpretation Climate Volatility, Foundational Freedoms, and the Environment Act 2021: The Transformative Potential of the Principle of Legality Protection of Athletes’ Rights in International Sports Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1