公元6世纪中期希腊中部神秘的大地震和海啸:地震构造、考古学和历史的重新审视

IF 1.6 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Holocene Pub Date : 2022-12-08 DOI:10.1177/09596836221138330
G. Papadopoulos, I. Triantafyllou, Andromachi Vassilopoulou
{"title":"公元6世纪中期希腊中部神秘的大地震和海啸:地震构造、考古学和历史的重新审视","authors":"G. Papadopoulos, I. Triantafyllou, Andromachi Vassilopoulou","doi":"10.1177/09596836221138330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In AD 552 the area around the Gulf of Corinth, Central Greece, was reportedly hit by large destructive earthquakes. At the same time a tsunami supposedly hit Maliac Bay. The case calls for a realistic interpretation since earthquake scenarios failed to explain rationally the narration of the contemporary Byzantine historian Procopius, the only literary source. Scholars have some doubts about Procopius’ reliability since he frequently copied classical authors. We found impressive similarities between the texts of Procopius and those by classic authors regarding the 426 BC central Greece tsunamigenic earthquake. Very likely the AD 552 Maliac Bay tsunami is a fake event in mimic of the 426 BC one. Sixth-century seismic disasters in southern Greece, reported away from the Gulf of Corinth have been attributed as a deus ex machina to the AD 552 earthquake(s) due to the lack of supporting literary sources. After critical examination of the Procopius’ narration and of relevant geological, seismotectonic, and archeological evidence, we concluded with a scenario comprising two strong (magnitude ~6.5) earthquakes but without tsunami generation. The first earthquake perhaps happened in Boeotia, NE Corinth Gulf, as palaeoseismological evidence also indicates. The second earthquake, in Patras-Naupactus area, western Corinth Gulf, is supported by convincing archeological findings. However, seismic destruction horizons in southern Greece are interpreted by distinct sixth-century earthquakes independent from the Procopius’ ones.","PeriodicalId":50402,"journal":{"name":"Holocene","volume":"33 1","pages":"267 - 280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The mid-6th century AD enigmatic mega earthquake and tsunami in central Greece: a seismotectonic, archeological, and historical reexamination\",\"authors\":\"G. Papadopoulos, I. Triantafyllou, Andromachi Vassilopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09596836221138330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In AD 552 the area around the Gulf of Corinth, Central Greece, was reportedly hit by large destructive earthquakes. At the same time a tsunami supposedly hit Maliac Bay. The case calls for a realistic interpretation since earthquake scenarios failed to explain rationally the narration of the contemporary Byzantine historian Procopius, the only literary source. Scholars have some doubts about Procopius’ reliability since he frequently copied classical authors. We found impressive similarities between the texts of Procopius and those by classic authors regarding the 426 BC central Greece tsunamigenic earthquake. Very likely the AD 552 Maliac Bay tsunami is a fake event in mimic of the 426 BC one. Sixth-century seismic disasters in southern Greece, reported away from the Gulf of Corinth have been attributed as a deus ex machina to the AD 552 earthquake(s) due to the lack of supporting literary sources. After critical examination of the Procopius’ narration and of relevant geological, seismotectonic, and archeological evidence, we concluded with a scenario comprising two strong (magnitude ~6.5) earthquakes but without tsunami generation. The first earthquake perhaps happened in Boeotia, NE Corinth Gulf, as palaeoseismological evidence also indicates. The second earthquake, in Patras-Naupactus area, western Corinth Gulf, is supported by convincing archeological findings. However, seismic destruction horizons in southern Greece are interpreted by distinct sixth-century earthquakes independent from the Procopius’ ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Holocene\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"267 - 280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Holocene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09596836221138330\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Holocene","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09596836221138330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

据报道,公元552年,希腊中部科林斯湾附近地区发生了大规模破坏性地震。据推测,在同一时间,一场海啸袭击了马里亚克湾。这起案件需要现实的解释,因为地震场景未能合理解释当代拜占庭历史学家普罗科皮乌斯的叙述,普罗科皮厄斯是唯一的文学来源。由于普罗科皮乌斯经常抄袭古典作家,学者们对他的可靠性产生了一些怀疑。我们发现普罗科皮乌斯的文本与经典作者关于公元前426年希腊中部海啸的文本有着惊人的相似之处。公元552年的马里湾海啸很可能是模仿公元前426年的一次虚假事件。据报道,6世纪希腊南部远离科林斯湾的地震灾害被归因于公元552年的地震,因为缺乏支持性的文献来源。在对普罗科皮乌斯的叙述以及相关的地质、地震构造和考古证据进行批判性审查后,我们得出了一个由两次强烈(6.5级)地震组成的场景,但没有产生海啸。古地震学证据也表明,第一次地震可能发生在科林斯湾东北部的Boeotia。第二次地震发生在科林斯湾西部的Patras Naupactus地区,有令人信服的考古发现。然而,希腊南部的地震破坏层是由独立于普罗科皮乌斯地震的不同的六世纪地震解释的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The mid-6th century AD enigmatic mega earthquake and tsunami in central Greece: a seismotectonic, archeological, and historical reexamination
In AD 552 the area around the Gulf of Corinth, Central Greece, was reportedly hit by large destructive earthquakes. At the same time a tsunami supposedly hit Maliac Bay. The case calls for a realistic interpretation since earthquake scenarios failed to explain rationally the narration of the contemporary Byzantine historian Procopius, the only literary source. Scholars have some doubts about Procopius’ reliability since he frequently copied classical authors. We found impressive similarities between the texts of Procopius and those by classic authors regarding the 426 BC central Greece tsunamigenic earthquake. Very likely the AD 552 Maliac Bay tsunami is a fake event in mimic of the 426 BC one. Sixth-century seismic disasters in southern Greece, reported away from the Gulf of Corinth have been attributed as a deus ex machina to the AD 552 earthquake(s) due to the lack of supporting literary sources. After critical examination of the Procopius’ narration and of relevant geological, seismotectonic, and archeological evidence, we concluded with a scenario comprising two strong (magnitude ~6.5) earthquakes but without tsunami generation. The first earthquake perhaps happened in Boeotia, NE Corinth Gulf, as palaeoseismological evidence also indicates. The second earthquake, in Patras-Naupactus area, western Corinth Gulf, is supported by convincing archeological findings. However, seismic destruction horizons in southern Greece are interpreted by distinct sixth-century earthquakes independent from the Procopius’ ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Holocene
Holocene 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
106
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Holocene is a high impact, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to fundamental scientific research at the interface between the long Quaternary record and the natural and human-induced environmental processes operating at the Earth''s surface today. The Holocene emphasizes environmental change over the last ca 11 700 years.
期刊最新文献
3D digitization and archaeobotanical analysis of wooden artifacts Inherited age of floating charcoal fragments in a sand-bed stream, Macdonald River, NSW, Australia: Implications for radiocarbon dating of sediments Climate change, site formation, and indigenous use of coastlines in Barbuda Living through changing climates: Temperature and seasonality correlate with population fluctuations among Holocene hunter-fisher-gatherers on the west coast of Norway Northern Norway paleofire records reveal two distinct phases of early human impacts on fire activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1