城市化和互助团体:对坦桑尼亚国家建设的贡献

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES Social Evolution & History Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI:10.30884/seh/2018.01.03
Oxana V. Ivanchenko, A. Banshchikova
{"title":"城市化和互助团体:对坦桑尼亚国家建设的贡献","authors":"Oxana V. Ivanchenko, A. Banshchikova","doi":"10.30884/seh/2018.01.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to mutual help groups in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, as an input to the country's successful nation-building process. It summarizes the results of field researches conducted by Oxana V. Ivanchenko in 2011, 2013, and 2015. The research targeted the practices of mutual help and self-organization among citizens of one of the most rapidly growing mega-cities in Africa, both its secondand third-generation old-timers and newcomers, usually the poorest Tanzanian villagers who rush to the big city in search for a better life. The methods of research include participant observation and interview, both formal and informal, with the inhabitants of uswahilini, traditional African neighborhoods, most commonly bearing the status of informal settlements. The research is focused on various forms of mutual help groups (kufa na kuzikana, mchezo/upatu, and vikoba), which nowadays tend to transform and carry out same functions of microcrediting, money-saving, loan-giving, providing the insurance in case of emergency (death, illness), and insuring socialization and strengthening of friendly relations in general. Over the course of data analysis, the authors come to a conclusion that the Tanzanians, who moved to the city, recreate the communal way of life of rural areas though in adapted forms: neighbors and colleagues become their new environment that provides social guarantees and help in difficult situation instead of relatives, and the leaders of mutual help groups help Ivanchenko and Banshchikova / Urbanization and Mutual Help Groups 35 resolve conflicts instead of the police. Strong pre-state traditions of community life and self-organization, characteristic of rural Tanzania, nowadays help urban Tanzania to grow up. And, what is even more important is that if earlier these traditions used to function only among same-tribe or same-region Tanzanians and would remain on the ethnic level, later in big cities they would flourish on inter-ethnic and supra-ethnic levels, because the need in mutual help did not disappear, while same-tribe friends and relatives were far away. Thus, it is clear that under peaceful circumstances urbanization and mutual help practices contribute to the nation-building process: people move from village to city and from traditional social bonds (on the level of tribe, region of provenance) to chosen social bonds (on nation-level, because all other ones are already overcome or non-existent).","PeriodicalId":42677,"journal":{"name":"Social Evolution & History","volume":"17 1","pages":"34-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urbanization and mutual help groups: contribution to nation-building in Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Oxana V. Ivanchenko, A. Banshchikova\",\"doi\":\"10.30884/seh/2018.01.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to mutual help groups in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, as an input to the country's successful nation-building process. It summarizes the results of field researches conducted by Oxana V. Ivanchenko in 2011, 2013, and 2015. The research targeted the practices of mutual help and self-organization among citizens of one of the most rapidly growing mega-cities in Africa, both its secondand third-generation old-timers and newcomers, usually the poorest Tanzanian villagers who rush to the big city in search for a better life. The methods of research include participant observation and interview, both formal and informal, with the inhabitants of uswahilini, traditional African neighborhoods, most commonly bearing the status of informal settlements. The research is focused on various forms of mutual help groups (kufa na kuzikana, mchezo/upatu, and vikoba), which nowadays tend to transform and carry out same functions of microcrediting, money-saving, loan-giving, providing the insurance in case of emergency (death, illness), and insuring socialization and strengthening of friendly relations in general. Over the course of data analysis, the authors come to a conclusion that the Tanzanians, who moved to the city, recreate the communal way of life of rural areas though in adapted forms: neighbors and colleagues become their new environment that provides social guarantees and help in difficult situation instead of relatives, and the leaders of mutual help groups help Ivanchenko and Banshchikova / Urbanization and Mutual Help Groups 35 resolve conflicts instead of the police. Strong pre-state traditions of community life and self-organization, characteristic of rural Tanzania, nowadays help urban Tanzania to grow up. And, what is even more important is that if earlier these traditions used to function only among same-tribe or same-region Tanzanians and would remain on the ethnic level, later in big cities they would flourish on inter-ethnic and supra-ethnic levels, because the need in mutual help did not disappear, while same-tribe friends and relatives were far away. Thus, it is clear that under peaceful circumstances urbanization and mutual help practices contribute to the nation-building process: people move from village to city and from traditional social bonds (on the level of tribe, region of provenance) to chosen social bonds (on nation-level, because all other ones are already overcome or non-existent).\",\"PeriodicalId\":42677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Evolution & History\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"34-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Evolution & History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2018.01.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Evolution & History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2018.01.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章专门介绍坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆的互助团体,作为对该国成功建国进程的投入。总结了Oxana V.Ivanchenko在2011年、2013年和2015年进行的实地研究结果。这项研究针对的是非洲发展最快的特大城市之一的公民之间的互助和自组织做法,包括其第二代和第三代老年人和新来者,通常是最贫穷的坦桑尼亚村民,他们涌向大城市寻求更好的生活。研究方法包括参与者观察和采访,包括正式和非正式的,与乌斯瓦希利尼的居民进行接触,乌斯瓦希利尼是非洲传统社区,通常具有非正式定居点的地位。研究的重点是各种形式的互助团体(kufa na kuzikana、mchezo/upatu和vikoba),这些团体如今倾向于转变和履行小额信贷、储蓄、贷款、在紧急情况下提供保险(死亡、疾病)、确保社会化和加强友好关系等相同职能。在数据分析过程中,作者得出的结论是,搬到城市的坦桑尼亚人重新创造了农村地区的公共生活方式,尽管形式有所改变:邻居和同事成为了他们的新环境,在困难的情况下提供社会保障和帮助,而不是亲人,互助小组的领导人帮助伊万琴科和班什奇科娃/城市化和互助小组35解决冲突,而不是警察。坦桑尼亚农村特有的强大的前国家社区生活和自组织传统,如今帮助坦桑尼亚城市成长。而且,更重要的是,如果早期这些传统只在同一部落或同一地区的坦桑尼亚人中发挥作用,并保持在种族层面上,那么后来在大城市,它们将在种族间和超种族层面上蓬勃发展,因为相互帮助的需求并没有消失,而同一部落的朋友和亲戚却远在他乡。因此,很明显,在和平的情况下,城市化和互助做法有助于国家建设进程:人们从一个村庄迁移到另一个城市,从传统的社会纽带(部落层面、原籍地区层面)迁移到选定的社会纽带上(国家层面,因为所有其他社会纽带都已经克服或不存在)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Urbanization and mutual help groups: contribution to nation-building in Tanzania
The article is devoted to mutual help groups in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, as an input to the country's successful nation-building process. It summarizes the results of field researches conducted by Oxana V. Ivanchenko in 2011, 2013, and 2015. The research targeted the practices of mutual help and self-organization among citizens of one of the most rapidly growing mega-cities in Africa, both its secondand third-generation old-timers and newcomers, usually the poorest Tanzanian villagers who rush to the big city in search for a better life. The methods of research include participant observation and interview, both formal and informal, with the inhabitants of uswahilini, traditional African neighborhoods, most commonly bearing the status of informal settlements. The research is focused on various forms of mutual help groups (kufa na kuzikana, mchezo/upatu, and vikoba), which nowadays tend to transform and carry out same functions of microcrediting, money-saving, loan-giving, providing the insurance in case of emergency (death, illness), and insuring socialization and strengthening of friendly relations in general. Over the course of data analysis, the authors come to a conclusion that the Tanzanians, who moved to the city, recreate the communal way of life of rural areas though in adapted forms: neighbors and colleagues become their new environment that provides social guarantees and help in difficult situation instead of relatives, and the leaders of mutual help groups help Ivanchenko and Banshchikova / Urbanization and Mutual Help Groups 35 resolve conflicts instead of the police. Strong pre-state traditions of community life and self-organization, characteristic of rural Tanzania, nowadays help urban Tanzania to grow up. And, what is even more important is that if earlier these traditions used to function only among same-tribe or same-region Tanzanians and would remain on the ethnic level, later in big cities they would flourish on inter-ethnic and supra-ethnic levels, because the need in mutual help did not disappear, while same-tribe friends and relatives were far away. Thus, it is clear that under peaceful circumstances urbanization and mutual help practices contribute to the nation-building process: people move from village to city and from traditional social bonds (on the level of tribe, region of provenance) to chosen social bonds (on nation-level, because all other ones are already overcome or non-existent).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Dois Tempos, Periférica Agenda Breve debate historiográfico sobre a evolução da filosofia da história: uma revisão de literatura Reforma agrária do Brasil e Peru da década de 60, sobre a ótica comparativa dos regimes militares The Rohingyas of Rakhine State: Social Evolution and History in the Light of Ethnic Nationalism Egypt: From Upper Egyptian Rural Petty Polities to Unitary State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1