{"title":"ANA阳性结果在门诊风湿病诊断中的预测","authors":"C. Chu, L. Ho, C. Mok","doi":"10.1142/s2661341723500025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To study the predictive value of a positive anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) for a rheumatological diagnosis in an outpatient setting. Methods: Individuals who were referred to the rheumatology outpatient clinics because of a positive ANA between July 2014 and June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Presenting symptoms in addition to a positive ANA and whether a final rheumatological diagnosis was made were recorded. The positive predictive value of a positive ANA and its titer for a rheumatological diagnosis, with and without accompanying symptoms was evaluated. Results: A total of 230 patients were included (82% women, age 47.7 ± 14.1 years [range 18-84]). Family medicine and the general outpatient clinic were the main sources of referral (32.2%), followed by ophthalmology (13.0%) and otorhinolaryngology (11.7%). A final rheumatological diagnosis was made in 54 (23.5%) patients, with rheumatoid arthritis being the commonest diagnosis (40.7%). In the absence of any associated symptoms, the predictive value of a positive ANA was 0%. The presence of Raynaud’s phenomenon (100%), joint swelling (59.5%), and joint stiffness (48.9%) predicted a better final rheumatological diagnosis along with a positive ANA. ANA titers of 1:80 or less had a low sensitivity for rheumatic diseases. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that an ANA titer of [Formula: see text]1:128 best predicted a rheumatological diagnosis (AUC 0.78 [0.71–0.85]; sensitivity 0.78; specificity 0.64). Conclusions: To improve the prediction for a rheumatological diagnosis, referral for a positive ANA test should be more appropriately done with compatible symptoms.","PeriodicalId":15538,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of a Positive ANA Result for a Rheumatological Diagnosis in an Outpatient Setting\",\"authors\":\"C. Chu, L. Ho, C. Mok\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2661341723500025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To study the predictive value of a positive anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) for a rheumatological diagnosis in an outpatient setting. Methods: Individuals who were referred to the rheumatology outpatient clinics because of a positive ANA between July 2014 and June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Presenting symptoms in addition to a positive ANA and whether a final rheumatological diagnosis was made were recorded. The positive predictive value of a positive ANA and its titer for a rheumatological diagnosis, with and without accompanying symptoms was evaluated. Results: A total of 230 patients were included (82% women, age 47.7 ± 14.1 years [range 18-84]). Family medicine and the general outpatient clinic were the main sources of referral (32.2%), followed by ophthalmology (13.0%) and otorhinolaryngology (11.7%). A final rheumatological diagnosis was made in 54 (23.5%) patients, with rheumatoid arthritis being the commonest diagnosis (40.7%). In the absence of any associated symptoms, the predictive value of a positive ANA was 0%. The presence of Raynaud’s phenomenon (100%), joint swelling (59.5%), and joint stiffness (48.9%) predicted a better final rheumatological diagnosis along with a positive ANA. ANA titers of 1:80 or less had a low sensitivity for rheumatic diseases. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that an ANA titer of [Formula: see text]1:128 best predicted a rheumatological diagnosis (AUC 0.78 [0.71–0.85]; sensitivity 0.78; specificity 0.64). Conclusions: To improve the prediction for a rheumatological diagnosis, referral for a positive ANA test should be more appropriately done with compatible symptoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661341723500025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661341723500025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prediction of a Positive ANA Result for a Rheumatological Diagnosis in an Outpatient Setting
Objective: To study the predictive value of a positive anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) for a rheumatological diagnosis in an outpatient setting. Methods: Individuals who were referred to the rheumatology outpatient clinics because of a positive ANA between July 2014 and June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Presenting symptoms in addition to a positive ANA and whether a final rheumatological diagnosis was made were recorded. The positive predictive value of a positive ANA and its titer for a rheumatological diagnosis, with and without accompanying symptoms was evaluated. Results: A total of 230 patients were included (82% women, age 47.7 ± 14.1 years [range 18-84]). Family medicine and the general outpatient clinic were the main sources of referral (32.2%), followed by ophthalmology (13.0%) and otorhinolaryngology (11.7%). A final rheumatological diagnosis was made in 54 (23.5%) patients, with rheumatoid arthritis being the commonest diagnosis (40.7%). In the absence of any associated symptoms, the predictive value of a positive ANA was 0%. The presence of Raynaud’s phenomenon (100%), joint swelling (59.5%), and joint stiffness (48.9%) predicted a better final rheumatological diagnosis along with a positive ANA. ANA titers of 1:80 or less had a low sensitivity for rheumatic diseases. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that an ANA titer of [Formula: see text]1:128 best predicted a rheumatological diagnosis (AUC 0.78 [0.71–0.85]; sensitivity 0.78; specificity 0.64). Conclusions: To improve the prediction for a rheumatological diagnosis, referral for a positive ANA test should be more appropriately done with compatible symptoms.