两种分离普氏Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165细胞外小泡方法的比较

N. Rabiei, S. A. Badi, F. E. Marvasti, T. N. Sattari, F. Vaziri, S. Siadat
{"title":"两种分离普氏Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165细胞外小泡方法的比较","authors":"N. Rabiei, S. A. Badi, F. E. Marvasti, T. N. Sattari, F. Vaziri, S. Siadat","doi":"10.29252/VACRES.5.1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are spherical structures, naturally secreted by Gram-negative and Grampositive bacteria. EVs play a critical role in the modulation of immune responses, bioactive cargo delivery, and cellcell communication. The conventional method of EVs preparation involves the use of detergent (ultracentrifugation method). For the first time, we used a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based method in our study to isolate EVs from prokaryotic cells, namely Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165. We then compared various features of this method with those of the ultracentrifugation method. Methods: Extraction of EVs was performed via sequential deoxycholate ultracentrifugation and PEG-based methods. The physicochemical properties of the extracted EVs were compared via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), SDS-PAGE, and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Results: The protein content of the extracted EVs was 1.6 and 0.5 mg/mL, based on the ultracentrifugation and PEG-based methods, respectively. According to the SDS-PAGE analysis, vesicle-associated proteins were located at 20-150 kDa. The SEM analysis showed that the extracted EVs had a diameter of 50-200 nm in both methods. The results of DLS analysis showed 4 populations of approximately 50-8000 nm in the ultracentrifugation method and approximately 100-2000 nm in the PEG-based method. The EVs extracted by the ultracentrifugation method showed higher negative charge densities in contrast to EVs extracted by the PEG-based method. Conclusion: Our result showed that PEG-based extraction is a fast, simple, and cost-effective method and EVs purity was within the acceptable range. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety and the efficacy of EVs in clinical practices, especially as vaccine delivery vehicles.","PeriodicalId":52727,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two isolation methods for extracellular vesicles from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165\",\"authors\":\"N. Rabiei, S. A. Badi, F. E. Marvasti, T. N. Sattari, F. Vaziri, S. Siadat\",\"doi\":\"10.29252/VACRES.5.1.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are spherical structures, naturally secreted by Gram-negative and Grampositive bacteria. EVs play a critical role in the modulation of immune responses, bioactive cargo delivery, and cellcell communication. The conventional method of EVs preparation involves the use of detergent (ultracentrifugation method). For the first time, we used a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based method in our study to isolate EVs from prokaryotic cells, namely Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165. We then compared various features of this method with those of the ultracentrifugation method. Methods: Extraction of EVs was performed via sequential deoxycholate ultracentrifugation and PEG-based methods. The physicochemical properties of the extracted EVs were compared via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), SDS-PAGE, and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Results: The protein content of the extracted EVs was 1.6 and 0.5 mg/mL, based on the ultracentrifugation and PEG-based methods, respectively. According to the SDS-PAGE analysis, vesicle-associated proteins were located at 20-150 kDa. The SEM analysis showed that the extracted EVs had a diameter of 50-200 nm in both methods. The results of DLS analysis showed 4 populations of approximately 50-8000 nm in the ultracentrifugation method and approximately 100-2000 nm in the PEG-based method. The EVs extracted by the ultracentrifugation method showed higher negative charge densities in contrast to EVs extracted by the PEG-based method. Conclusion: Our result showed that PEG-based extraction is a fast, simple, and cost-effective method and EVs purity was within the acceptable range. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety and the efficacy of EVs in clinical practices, especially as vaccine delivery vehicles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29252/VACRES.5.1.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/VACRES.5.1.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介:细胞外小泡是由革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌自然分泌的球形结构。EVs在调节免疫反应、生物活性货物递送和细胞间通讯方面发挥着关键作用。EVs的常规制备方法包括使用洗涤剂(超速离心法)。在我们的研究中,我们首次使用基于聚乙二醇(PEG)的方法从原核细胞中分离EVs,即prausnitzii Faecalibacterium A2-165。然后,我们将这种方法的各种特征与超速离心法的特征进行了比较。方法:采用脱氧胆酸盐超速离心法和PEG法提取EVs。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、SDS-PAGE和动态光散射(DLS)对提取的EVs的物理化学性质进行了比较。结果:基于超速离心和基于PEG的方法,提取的EVs的蛋白质含量分别为1.6和0.5 mg/mL。根据SDS-PAGE分析,囊泡相关蛋白位于20-150kDa。SEM分析表明,在两种方法中提取的EVs的直径均为50-200nm。DLS分析的结果显示,在超速离心法中为约50-8000nm的4个群体,在基于PEG的方法中为约100-2000nm。与通过基于PEG的方法提取的EVs相比,通过超速离心方法提取的EV显示出更高的负电荷密度。结论:我们的结果表明,基于PEG的提取是一种快速、简单、经济高效的方法,EVs的纯度在可接受的范围内。需要进一步的研究来确认电动汽车在临床实践中的安全性和有效性,尤其是作为疫苗递送工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of two isolation methods for extracellular vesicles from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165
Introduction: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are spherical structures, naturally secreted by Gram-negative and Grampositive bacteria. EVs play a critical role in the modulation of immune responses, bioactive cargo delivery, and cellcell communication. The conventional method of EVs preparation involves the use of detergent (ultracentrifugation method). For the first time, we used a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based method in our study to isolate EVs from prokaryotic cells, namely Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165. We then compared various features of this method with those of the ultracentrifugation method. Methods: Extraction of EVs was performed via sequential deoxycholate ultracentrifugation and PEG-based methods. The physicochemical properties of the extracted EVs were compared via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), SDS-PAGE, and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Results: The protein content of the extracted EVs was 1.6 and 0.5 mg/mL, based on the ultracentrifugation and PEG-based methods, respectively. According to the SDS-PAGE analysis, vesicle-associated proteins were located at 20-150 kDa. The SEM analysis showed that the extracted EVs had a diameter of 50-200 nm in both methods. The results of DLS analysis showed 4 populations of approximately 50-8000 nm in the ultracentrifugation method and approximately 100-2000 nm in the PEG-based method. The EVs extracted by the ultracentrifugation method showed higher negative charge densities in contrast to EVs extracted by the PEG-based method. Conclusion: Our result showed that PEG-based extraction is a fast, simple, and cost-effective method and EVs purity was within the acceptable range. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety and the efficacy of EVs in clinical practices, especially as vaccine delivery vehicles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vaccine Innovation for Dengue, Chikungunya, Zika and Yellow Fever: Accelerating Global Development Agenda and Partnerships in Post-COVID Era Immunoinformatics Approach for Designing an HPV Epitope-Based Vaccine Candidate Harboring Built-in Adjuvants The predominance of Newcastle disease virus genotype VII: genome diversity or poor cross-immunity of non-matched vaccines Commentary on Corneal Graft Rejection after COVID-19 Vaccination: Our Experience and Concerns The Healthcare Workers’ Vaccination – current Policy and Recommendations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1