弱视与盲症学生数位能力之概念架构

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/0145482X221149979
Cheryl Kamei-Hannan, M. J. Tuttle, Rujira Songkhao
{"title":"弱视与盲症学生数位能力之概念架构","authors":"Cheryl Kamei-Hannan, M. J. Tuttle, Rujira Songkhao","doi":"10.1177/0145482X221149979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Proficient use of technology requires many intersecting skills including literacy, citizenship, advocacy, self-determination, and digital competence. In this study, the authors engaged experts in the field of visual impairment in focus groups with the purpose of defining digital competence, discussing issues related to visual impairment, identifying specific skills, and organizing technology competencies. Methods: Purposeful sampling was used to recruit 32 assistive technology and literacy experts in the field of visual impairment to participate in a series of focus groups. Each focus group was presented with four main topics (1) defining digital competence, (2) identifying specific considerations for individuals with visual impairments (i.e., those who are blind or have low vision), (3) forming a list of technology competencies, and (4) categorizing competencies into an organized structure. Within-group consensus and across-group data saturation were achieved after nine focus groups were conducted via teleconferencing. Results: Focus groups led to three significant findings. First, the consensus was reached by participants on the definition of digital competence. Second, participants agreed upon considerations for individuals with visual impairments. Third, a set of 41 competencies was created. A consensus was not reached on categorizing the competencies. However, several themes arose including the need to address problem solving, accessibility, self-advocacy, citizenship, and self-determination, in addition to technology skills. Discussion: Authors concluded the study by presenting a framework for digital competence that may be used to guide future research. Implications for Practitioners: Students’ success in digital learning environments is predicated on skills that extend beyond device usage. In addition to using digital tools efficiently and effectively, instruction should include opportunities for self-determination, access, problem solving, critical thinking, citizenship, and advocacy.","PeriodicalId":47438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","volume":"117 1","pages":"7 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Conceptual Framework for Digital Competence of Students With Low Vision and Blindness\",\"authors\":\"Cheryl Kamei-Hannan, M. J. Tuttle, Rujira Songkhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0145482X221149979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Proficient use of technology requires many intersecting skills including literacy, citizenship, advocacy, self-determination, and digital competence. In this study, the authors engaged experts in the field of visual impairment in focus groups with the purpose of defining digital competence, discussing issues related to visual impairment, identifying specific skills, and organizing technology competencies. Methods: Purposeful sampling was used to recruit 32 assistive technology and literacy experts in the field of visual impairment to participate in a series of focus groups. Each focus group was presented with four main topics (1) defining digital competence, (2) identifying specific considerations for individuals with visual impairments (i.e., those who are blind or have low vision), (3) forming a list of technology competencies, and (4) categorizing competencies into an organized structure. Within-group consensus and across-group data saturation were achieved after nine focus groups were conducted via teleconferencing. Results: Focus groups led to three significant findings. First, the consensus was reached by participants on the definition of digital competence. Second, participants agreed upon considerations for individuals with visual impairments. Third, a set of 41 competencies was created. A consensus was not reached on categorizing the competencies. However, several themes arose including the need to address problem solving, accessibility, self-advocacy, citizenship, and self-determination, in addition to technology skills. Discussion: Authors concluded the study by presenting a framework for digital competence that may be used to guide future research. Implications for Practitioners: Students’ success in digital learning environments is predicated on skills that extend beyond device usage. In addition to using digital tools efficiently and effectively, instruction should include opportunities for self-determination, access, problem solving, critical thinking, citizenship, and advocacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"7 - 18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X221149979\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X221149979","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:熟练使用技术需要许多交叉技能,包括识字、公民身份、宣传、自决和数字能力。在这项研究中,作者让视觉障碍领域的专家参加焦点小组,目的是定义数字能力,讨论与视觉障碍相关的问题,确定特定技能,并组织技术能力。方法:采用有目的的抽样方法,招募32名视觉障碍领域的辅助技术和识字专家参加一系列焦点小组。每个焦点小组都有四个主要主题:(1)定义数字能力,(2)确定视觉障碍者(即盲人或低视力者)的具体考虑因素,(3)形成技术能力列表,以及(4)将能力分类为一个有组织的结构。在通过电话会议进行了九个重点小组讨论后,小组内部和小组间的数据饱和。结果:焦点小组得出了三个重要的发现。首先,与会者就数字能力的定义达成了共识。其次,参与者就视觉障碍患者的考虑因素达成一致。第三,建立了一套41项能力。未能就能力分类达成共识。然而,出现了几个主题,包括需要解决问题、无障碍、自我宣传、公民身份和自决,以及技术技能。讨论:作者在研究结束时提出了一个数字能力框架,可用于指导未来的研究。对从业者的启示:学生在数字学习环境中的成功取决于超越设备使用的技能。除了高效和有效地使用数字工具外,教学还应包括自决、获取、解决问题、批判性思维、公民身份和倡导的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Conceptual Framework for Digital Competence of Students With Low Vision and Blindness
Introduction: Proficient use of technology requires many intersecting skills including literacy, citizenship, advocacy, self-determination, and digital competence. In this study, the authors engaged experts in the field of visual impairment in focus groups with the purpose of defining digital competence, discussing issues related to visual impairment, identifying specific skills, and organizing technology competencies. Methods: Purposeful sampling was used to recruit 32 assistive technology and literacy experts in the field of visual impairment to participate in a series of focus groups. Each focus group was presented with four main topics (1) defining digital competence, (2) identifying specific considerations for individuals with visual impairments (i.e., those who are blind or have low vision), (3) forming a list of technology competencies, and (4) categorizing competencies into an organized structure. Within-group consensus and across-group data saturation were achieved after nine focus groups were conducted via teleconferencing. Results: Focus groups led to three significant findings. First, the consensus was reached by participants on the definition of digital competence. Second, participants agreed upon considerations for individuals with visual impairments. Third, a set of 41 competencies was created. A consensus was not reached on categorizing the competencies. However, several themes arose including the need to address problem solving, accessibility, self-advocacy, citizenship, and self-determination, in addition to technology skills. Discussion: Authors concluded the study by presenting a framework for digital competence that may be used to guide future research. Implications for Practitioners: Students’ success in digital learning environments is predicated on skills that extend beyond device usage. In addition to using digital tools efficiently and effectively, instruction should include opportunities for self-determination, access, problem solving, critical thinking, citizenship, and advocacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness is the essential professional resource for information about visual impairment (that is, blindness or low vision). The international peer-reviewed journal of record in the field, it delivers current research and best practice information, commentary from authoritative experts on critical topics, News From the Field, and a calendar of important events. Practitioners and researchers, policymakers and administrators, counselors and advocates rely on JVIB for its delivery of cutting-edge research and the most up-to-date practices in the field of visual impairment and blindness. Available in print and online 24/7, JVIB offers immediate access to information from the leading researchers, teachers of students with visual impairments (often referred to as TVIs), orientation and mobility (O&M) practitioners, vision rehabilitation therapists (often referred to as VRTs), early interventionists, and low vision therapists (often referred to as LVTs) in the field.
期刊最新文献
A graded neonatal mouse model of necrotizing enterocolitis demonstrates that mild enterocolitis is sufficient to activate microglia and increase cerebral cytokine expression. Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Job Search Intervention for Adults With Visual Impairments via Videoconferencing. Components of Valid Learning Media Assessments Using Checklists as a Vocational Rehabilitation Tool for Employed Consumers JVIB Peer Reviewers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1