受益人何时受益?

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Trusts & Trustees Pub Date : 2021-10-09 DOI:10.1093/tandt/ttab086
Stephen Alexander
{"title":"受益人何时受益?","authors":"Stephen Alexander","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n It is a well-recognised principle that trustees, acting as fiduciaries, must exercise their discretionary powers for the benefit of the beneficiaries of the trust. A wrongful exercise of those powers will be a breach and may be set aside by a court. In most cases, the question of whether the exercise of the discretion is of “benefit” to the beneficiary is obvious. However, there are occasions where it is not so, particularly where the “benefit” to the beneficiary is not direct or is not fiscal in nature. In these cases, trustees must tread carefully. The Royal Court's recent decision in In the matter of the May Trust [2021] JRC137 provides important clarification on what constitutes a “benefit” and is essential guidance for trustees in this often misunderstood area.","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When does a beneficiary benefit?\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttab086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n It is a well-recognised principle that trustees, acting as fiduciaries, must exercise their discretionary powers for the benefit of the beneficiaries of the trust. A wrongful exercise of those powers will be a breach and may be set aside by a court. In most cases, the question of whether the exercise of the discretion is of “benefit” to the beneficiary is obvious. However, there are occasions where it is not so, particularly where the “benefit” to the beneficiary is not direct or is not fiscal in nature. In these cases, trustees must tread carefully. The Royal Court's recent decision in In the matter of the May Trust [2021] JRC137 provides important clarification on what constitutes a “benefit” and is essential guidance for trustees in this often misunderstood area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

受托人作为受托人,必须为了信托受益人的利益行使其自由裁量权,这是一项公认的原则。错误行使这些权力将构成违约,可能会被法院撤销。在大多数情况下,行使自由裁量权是否对受益人“有利”的问题是显而易见的。然而,有时情况并非如此,特别是受益人的“利益”不是直接的或不是财政性质的。在这种情况下,受托人必须谨慎行事。皇家法院最近在《五月信托案[2021]JRC137》中的裁决对什么是“利益”做出了重要澄清,并对受托人在这一经常被误解的领域提供了重要指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When does a beneficiary benefit?
It is a well-recognised principle that trustees, acting as fiduciaries, must exercise their discretionary powers for the benefit of the beneficiaries of the trust. A wrongful exercise of those powers will be a breach and may be set aside by a court. In most cases, the question of whether the exercise of the discretion is of “benefit” to the beneficiary is obvious. However, there are occasions where it is not so, particularly where the “benefit” to the beneficiary is not direct or is not fiscal in nature. In these cases, trustees must tread carefully. The Royal Court's recent decision in In the matter of the May Trust [2021] JRC137 provides important clarification on what constitutes a “benefit” and is essential guidance for trustees in this often misunderstood area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
CC14 guidance update: greener investments, greater uncertainty? Australian tax arrangements for trusts: Section 100A of the Income Tax Assessment Act (1936) Cth Fathers, daughters, and matters of trust In brief An analysis of the risks that arise for discretionary trust settlements in the event of a divorce: to what extent does the Family Court’s asset division approach undermine discretionary trusts?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1